Efficacy and Safety of NeuroEndoscopic Surgery for Large IntraCerebral Hemorrhage (NESICH 2)

May 14, 2025 updated by: Rong Hu, MD, Southwest Hospital, China

Efficacy and Safety of NeuroEndoscopic Surgery for Large IntraCerebral Hemorrhage: a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

This is a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing neuroendoscopic hematoma removal to craniotomy in the treatment of large intracerebral hemorrhage.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Previous retrospective studies have demonstrated that neuroendoscopic surgery, compared to conventional craniotomy, significantly reduces operative duration and intraoperative blood loss, enhances hematoma evacuation rates, and improves postoperative outcomes, including neurological recovery, activities of daily living, and quality of life in patients with large cerebral hemorrhage. However, there is a paucity of prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of different surgical techniques for intracerebral hemorrhage. To address this gap, the investigators propose a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of neuroendoscopic surgery versus craniotomy, aiming to provide evidence-based guidance for surgical decision-making in cerebral hemorrhage management.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

280

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Chongqing
      • Chongqing, Chongqing, China, 400038
        • Recruiting
        • Southwest Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Sichuan
      • Dazhou, Sichuan, China, 635100
        • Recruiting
        • Dazhu County People's Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-80 years old, male or female;
  2. The time between onset and admission to the first diagnostic CT is within 24 hours (for no bystanders and the time of onset is unknown, the time of the last known patient in good condition is used);
  3. Patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage) whose hematoma volume is ≥50ml or whose hematoma produces obvious space occupying effect and requires emergency surgery (including patients with cerebral hernia signs such as retarding or dilatation of light reflex of one pupil);
  4. Before randomization, GCS score was 5-14, NIHSS score was ≥6;
  5. mRS Before onset: 0-1 score;
  6. Randomization within 24 hours after the first diagnostic CT;
  7. The patient or family members are informed and voluntarily sign the informed consent;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The clinical diagnosis is caused by cerebral aneurysm, cerebrovascular malformation, moyamoya disease, brain trauma, brain tumor, massive cerebral infarction hemorrhage transformation, coagulation dysfunction, etc.;
  2. Thalamic hemorrhage, primary ventricular hemorrhage;
  3. Platelet count <100×109/L, INR > 1.4;
  4. Patients with advanced cerebral hernia (such as dilated bifidus and no light reflex) or unstable vital signs cannot tolerate surgery;
  5. Irreversible brain stem impairment (eye fixation, bilateral pupil dilation), GCS≤4 points;
  6. Any history of parenchyma or other intracranial subarachnoid, subdural or epidural blood and surgical history in the past 30 days;
  7. Patients with severe advanced cognitive impairment (such as AD) or who are not expected to complete the follow-up plan as required;
  8. Complicated with other serious diseases: including respiratory, circulation, digestion, urinary, endocrine, immune and blood systems;
  9. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or those who expect to become pregnant within one year;
  10. are participating in other clinical trials (excluding: observational studies that do not involve intervention, natural history and/or epidemiological studies).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental Arm
Neuroendoscopic Surgery to remove intracranial hematoma
Subjects will receive Neuroendoscopic Surgery followed by standard medical management
Active Comparator: Control Arm
Craniotomy to remove intracranial hematoma
Subjects will receive Craniotomy followed by standard medical management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of patients with Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-3
Time Frame: 180 days
Functional outcome (comparing the intervention group to the control), assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months.The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. It is scored from: 0=No symptoms at all, 1=No significant disability, 2=Slight disability, 3=Moderate disability, 4=Moderately severe disability, 5=Severe disability and 6=death.
180 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of ICU
Time Frame: Number of days from admission, up to 180 days
Duration of stay in the ICU
Number of days from admission, up to 180 days
Length of hospitalization
Time Frame: Number of days from admission to discharge, up to 180 days
Duration of stay in the hospital
Number of days from admission to discharge, up to 180 days
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score
Time Frame: 180 days
The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. It is scored from: 0=No symptoms at all, 1=No significant disability, 2=Slight disability, 3=Moderate disability, 4=Moderately severe disability, 5=Severe disability and 6=death.
180 days
Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E)
Time Frame: 180 days
GOS-E subdivides the categories of severe and moderate disability and good recovery using a scale of 1 to 8 where 1 = death, 2 = vegetative state, 3 = lower severe disability, 4 = upper severe disability, 5 = lower moderate disability, 6 = upper moderate disability, 7 = lower good recovery, and 8 = upper good recovery. Structured telephone interviews have been developed and validated for the GOS-E and these questions were incorporated into the follow-up survey. GOS-E was dichotomized into unfavorable (1 to 4) and favorable (5 to 8) outcomes.
180 days
Assessment of cognitive function with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: 90 days and 180 days
The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function.
90 days and 180 days
Quality of life measured with the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: 30 days and 180 days
The EQ-5D-5L is a standard measure of health-related quality of life.EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and a visual analog scale (VAS). EQ-5D health state profile comprises 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The 5D-5L systems are converted into a single index utility score between 0 to 1, where a higher score indicates a better health state. The VAS records the participant's health on a 0-100 mm VAS scale, with 0 indicating "the worst health you can imagine" and 100 indicating "the best health you can imagine". Higher scores of EQ VAS indicate better health.
30 days and 180 days
The proportion of patients with Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2
Time Frame: 180 days
Functional outcome (comparing the intervention group to the control), assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months.The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. It is scored from: 0=No symptoms at all, 1=No significant disability, 2=Slight disability, 3=Moderate disability, 4=Moderately severe disability, 5=Severe disability and 6=death.
180 days
The proportion of patients with Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-3
Time Frame: 30 days and 90 days
Functional outcome (comparing the intervention group to the control), assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 6 months.The mRS is a commonly used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered a stroke or other causes of neurological disability. It is scored from: 0=No symptoms at all, 1=No significant disability, 2=Slight disability, 3=Moderate disability, 4=Moderately severe disability, 5=Severe disability and 6=death.
30 days and 90 days
Operation duration
Time Frame: From the beginning to the end of the surgery
The length of the operation
From the beginning to the end of the surgery
Peroperative bleeding
Time Frame: During surgery
The amount of blood lost during surgery
During surgery
mortality
Time Frame: 30 days, 90 days and 180 days
All cause mortality from onset to 180 days
30 days, 90 days and 180 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Rong Hu, MD, PLA Army Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intracerebral Haemorrhage

Clinical Trials on neuroendoscopic surgery

Subscribe