- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06895109
Cognitive Functions in Severe Acquired Brain Injury After Cranioplasty (NeC)
Evaluation of Improvement in Cognitive Functions and Psychological Aspects in Patients With Severe Acquired Brain Injury After Cranioplasty
Cranioplasty is the main reconstructive neurosurgical procedure, performed in approximately 80% of patients who have previously undergone demolitive surgeries in an emergency setting, particularly in the case of decompressive craniectomy . It mainly aims to ensure the protection of brain tissue and improve the aesthetic appearance. Statistical correlation analyses between timing of cranioplasty and neurological recovery are probably in favor of early cranioplasty. Cranioplasty improves motor and cognitive rehabilitation outcomes. However, it carries an increased risk of postoperative complications, such as seizures and infections. Other studies show that cranioplasty performed 3 to 6 months after craniectomy can significantly improve motor and cognitive recovery.
The timing of the intervention plays a fundamental role in enucleating cognitive improvement. In fact, greater cognitive changes have been observed in patients who underwent cranioplasty within 6 months of the injury. Therefore, cranioplasty must be considered a key factor for neuropsychological recovery and should be performed early in order to make the most of the rehabilitation window. In the literature, there are studies that have evaluated how cranioplasty can facilitate cognitive recovery, regardless of timing. In particular, a significant cognitive recovery was observed in the period immediately following cranioplasty, while the improvement stabilizes after a certain period of time and recovery begins to slow down. In patients with severe acquired brain injury (GCA), cranioplasty seems to significantly improve neuropsychological and motor function, even after a long time from the procedure. The aim of the study is therefore to evaluate whether in patients with severe acquired brain injury who underwent cranioplasty in the neurorehabilitation setting there is an improvement in cognitive, motor functions and psychological aspects.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
RM
-
Roma, RM, Italy, 00168
- UOC Neuroriabilitazione ad alta intensità, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli"
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female patient aged 18 to 79 years;
- Patient with severe acquired brain injury, undergoing craniotomy and subsequent percolate repositioning;
- Patient without cognitive disorders before GCA;
- Patient with cognitive and/or psychological disorders post GCA;
- Patient, caregiver or legal guardian, has voluntarily signed the informed consent, privacy form, approved by the Ethics Committee, before performing any procedure of the study
Exclusion Criteria:
Age <18 or over 80;
- An MMSE score less than 8;
- Language barrier;
- Education level less than 8 years of age (lower secondary school diploma);
- Medical conditions such as severe hearing loss or vision loss that in the opinion of the physician could preclude data collection;
- History of psychiatric disorders according to D5M V or ICD-10 criteria, for which, in the opinion of the physician, the patient is not suitable for enrollment;
- Onset of acute pathologies close to the post-operative period and related to the surgery (1-10 days), such as: hydrocephalus, brain infections, epileptogenic picture.
- Ongoing acute pathologies, liver, kidney or heart failure.
- Patient, caregiver or legal guardian, refuse to sign the informed consent, privacy form, approved by the Ethics Committee, before performing any study procedure
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Primary objective
The primary objective of the study is to analyze the neuropsychological profile of a sample of patients with severe acquired brain injury, who underwent craniotomy and subsequent opercular reapposition surgery 30 days after surgery.
|
To analyze the neuropsychological, motor and functional profile of a sample of patients with severe acquired brain injury, who underwent craniotomy and subsequent opercular reapposition surgery
|
|
Secondary objective
Evaluate the relationship between neuropsychological aspects and neurosurgical intervention of opercular re-opposition 7 days after surgery and any differences between 7 and 30 days; Analyze motor performance; Analyze cerebral metabolism of the patient sample.
Analyze motor performance of the patient sample:
|
To analyze the neuropsychological, motor and functional profile of a sample of patients with severe acquired brain injury, who underwent craniotomy and subsequent opercular reapposition surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Neuropsychological profile
Time Frame: At baseline (T0) and 30 days after surgery (T1)
|
To analyze the neuropsychological profile of a sample of patients with severe acquired brain injury, who underwent craniotomy and subsequent opercular reapposition surgery
|
At baseline (T0) and 30 days after surgery (T1)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Analyze the various aspects
Time Frame: At T0: at the time of admission (pre-surgery); At T1: approximately one week after the operculum repositioning procedure; > At T2: approximately one month after the operculum repositioning procedure.
|
To evaluate the relationship between neuropsychological aspects and neurosurgical intervention of opercular reopposition, to analyze motor performances, cerebral metabolism and motor performances of the patient sample.
|
At T0: at the time of admission (pre-surgery); At T1: approximately one week after the operculum repositioning procedure; > At T2: approximately one month after the operculum repositioning procedure.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Di Stefano C, Rinaldesi ML, Quinquinio C, Ridolfi C, Vallasciani M, Sturiale C, Piperno R. Neuropsychological changes and cranioplasty: A group analysis. Brain Inj. 2016;30(2):164-71. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1090013. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
- Malcolm JG, Rindler RS, Chu JK, Grossberg JA, Pradilla G, Ahmad FU. Complications following cranioplasty and relationship to timing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Nov;33:39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
- Sheikh MA, Ali S, Khan A. Uroflowmetry: nomograms in healthy young Pakistani men. J Pak Med Assoc. 2024 Oct;74(10):1806-1810. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.10626.
- Corallo F, Lo Buono V, Calabro RS, De Cola MC. Can Cranioplasty Be Considered a Tool to Improve Cognitive Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury? A 5-Years Retrospective Study. J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 21;10(22):5437. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225437.
- Corallo F, Calabro RS, Leo A, Bramanti P. Can cranioplasty be effective in improving cognitive and motor function in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness? A case report. Turk Neurosurg. 2015;25(1):193-6. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.10618-14.2.
- De Cola MC, Corallo F, Pria D, Lo Buono V, Calabro RS. Timing for cranioplasty to improve neurological outcome: A systematic review. Brain Behav. 2018 Nov;8(11):e01106. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1106. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
- Corallo F, De Cola MC, Lo Buono V, Marra A, De Luca R, Trinchera A, Bramanti P, Calabro RS. Early vs late cranioplasty: what is better? Int J Neurosci. 2017 Aug;127(8):688-693. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2016.1235045. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
- Ozoner B. Cranioplasty Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Role in Neurorecovery. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;21(11):62. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01147-6.
- Corallo F, De Cola MC, Lo Buono V, Cammaroto S, Marra A, Manuli A, Calabro RS. Recovery of Severe Aphasia After Cranioplasty: Considerations on a Case Study. Rehabil Nurs. 2020 Jul/Aug;45(4):238-242. doi: 10.1097/rnj.0000000000000212.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 6349
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Brain Injury
-
Brent MaselThe Moody FoundationCompletedChronic Traumatic Brain InjuryUnited States
-
University of TurkuTurku University Hospital; The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation... and other collaboratorsCompletedBrain Injuries | TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) | Brain Injuries, Traumatic | Traumatic Brain Injury | Injury, Brain, TraumaticFinland
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUnknownTraumatic Brain Injury | Severe Brain Injury | Closed Traumatic Brain InjuryBrazil
-
BrainScope Company, Inc.Active, not recruitingTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) | Concussion, Brain | MTBI - Mild Traumatic Brain Injury | Closed Head InjuryUnited States
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en AutomatiqueRecruitingTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)France
-
Queen Mary University of LondonCompleted
-
Center for Vision Development, New Market, MarylandUnknownBrain Injuries | Brain Injuries, Traumatic | Traumatic Brain Injury | Brain Injury, Chronic | Injury, Brain, TraumaticUnited States
-
Fondazione per la Ricerca Ospedale MaggioreCompletedBrain Injuries, Traumatic | Brain Injury Traumatic Severe | Brain Injury Traumatic ModerateItaly
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
University of MiamiNeurolignCompletedBrain Injuries | Brain Injuries, Traumatic | Traumatic Brain Injury | Mild Traumatic Brain Injury | Head InjuryUnited States
Clinical Trials on improvement of cognitive functions and psychological aspects
-
Raúl Sampieri CabreraCompletedStudents at Risk of Obtaining Low Academic PerformanceMexico
-
IRCCS San RaffaeleCompleted
-
Kocaeli UniversityCompleted
-
Universidad Autonoma de Baja CaliforniaNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedAutism Spectrum DisorderEgypt
-
University Hospital, CaenCompletedRelapsing-Remitting Multiple SclerosisFrance
-
University of SevilleUnknownExecutive Function | Strength TrainingSpain
-
University of AlbertaActive, not recruitingAtopic Dermatitis (AD)Canada
-
Universita di VeronaAzienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana; Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est; Montecatone... and other collaboratorsRecruitingIctus | Severe Acquired Brain Injury | sABIItaly
-
Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Education and Research HospitalCompletedthe Effect of Different Mechanical Ventilation Modes on Optic Nerve Diameter and Conscious FunctionsMechanical VentilationTurkey