Spinal and Supraspinal Control in Chronic Ankle Instability

March 21, 2025 updated by: Ayca Yagcioglu

Cross-Education Effect of Structured Balance Training Program on Spinal and Supraspinal Control in Athletes with Chronic Ankle Instability

Ankle sprains are common sports injuries that often lead to chronic ankle instability (CAI). Patients with CAI experience deficits in neuromuscular control (NMC), including proprioception and strength. It is believed that damage to the ankle's ligament mechanoreceptors and the peroneal nerve after the initial ankle sprain can cause alterations in NMC, resulting in postural control and dynamic joint stability dysfunction. Inflammation related to recurrent ankle sprains may also contribute to neuromuscular impairments. Evidence suggests that bilateral postural control deficits occur after an ankle sprain, suggesting alterations in the central nervous system (CNS). Rehabilitation for CAI has been shown to lead to bilateral improvements in NMC, potentially due to neural alterations at both the spinal and supraspinal levels. Cross-education, which refers to the muscular crossed effect of unilateral training, has also been proposed as a mechanism for improving contralateral strength in neurologically healthy individuals. While the exact mechanisms underlying cross-education are not yet fully understood, evidence suggests that it involves neural adaptations at both spinal and supraspinal levels. This study aims to investigate the cross-education effect of a 6-week, unilateral balance training on corticomotor excitability, motor neuron pool excitability, and static and dynamic balance in athletes with chronic ankle instability.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34755
        • Recruiting
        • Yeditepe University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Ayca Yagcioglu, MSc
        • Contact:
          • Feyza Şule Hantal, PHd
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34718
        • Recruiting
        • Yeditepe University Kosuyolu Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Berrin Aktekin, MD, Professor
        • Contact:
          • Gülçin Çelik, MSc
        • Contact:
          • Rengin Bilgen, MD
        • Contact:
          • Ayca Yagcioglu, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volunteering to participate in the study,
  • Being an athlete between the ages of 18-25,
  • Being a player in a field team sport such as basketball, volleyball, and handball,
  • Having a history of at least 2 significant grade II LAS diagnosed by a physician,
  • Related inflammatory symptoms, "giving away" sensation, obtaining a score ≤25 from the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT),
  • A score <90% for the activities of daily living subscale and <80% for the sport subscale from the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure,
  • Recurrent episodes of LAS of the injured ankle which occurred within at least 12 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute injury of lower extremity musculoskeletal structures in the last three months,
  • Orthopedic surgery in any of the lower extremities,
  • Bilateral ankle instability,
  • Vestibular or balance disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
No intervention will be applied.
Experimental: Stable Group
The intervention will be applied to only the stable ankle of the athletes with unilateral chronic ankle instability.
The structured balance training protocol consists of 7 exercises including balance and hop stabilization exercises for athletes with chronic ankle instability.
Experimental: Unstable Group
The intervention will be applied to only the unstable ankle of the athletes with unilateral chronic ankle instability.
The structured balance training protocol consists of 7 exercises including balance and hop stabilization exercises for athletes with chronic ankle instability.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proprioceptive-Stabilometric Assessment
Time Frame: at the baseline and end of the intervention, 8 weeks
The Prokin PK 252 will be used for proprioceptive-stabilometric assessment of the lower extremities, incorporating static and dynamic evaluations. The sensorimotor assessment will include the monopodal controlled-load proprioceptive control test and its variant with total load. Participants will perform movements with one foot on the platform, with angular displacements converted into electrical impulses for data acquisition. Static balance will be assessed on a stable platform for 30 seconds per ankle under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Dynamic balance will be measured on an unstable platform under the same conditions. Proprioception will be evaluated on an unstable platform for 90 seconds, guiding the platform through horizontal, diagonal, and circular patterns as per the test program.
at the baseline and end of the intervention, 8 weeks
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Time Frame: at the baseline and end of the intervention, 8 weeks

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), a non-invasive neurophysiological technique, will be used to assess motor cortical function. Corticomotor excitability will be evaluated using dual-cone coil TMS to examine adaptations following cross-training after unilateral training. TMS will induce corticospinal volleys of direct (D) and indirect (I) waves.

The resting motor threshold (rMT), a biomarker of upper motor neuron function, will be recorded. EMG recordings will assess corticomotor excitability, with Ag/AgCl electrodes placed on the tibialis anterior, peroneus longus, and gastrocnemius medialis muscles, following SENIAM guidelines.

Participants will be seated in a TMS chair, and the hotspot in the left primary motor cortex will be identified. The MEP amplitude will be assessed at 120% rMT with 10 repetitions, and latency will be recorded. A 15-minute rest will be observed between muscle tests.

at the baseline and end of the intervention, 8 weeks
Hoffman Reflex
Time Frame: at the baseline and end of the intervention, 8 weeks

The H-reflex will be measured to assess motor neuron pool excitability within the spinal loop, aiming to explain the mechanism underlying bilateral adaptations. As a valuable tool for evaluating neurological function in athletes, the H-reflex will provide insights into neurophysiological changes.

EMG signals will be pre-amplified and bandpass filtered between 30-300 Hz and recorded from the peroneus longus, tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius medialis muscles. The tibial nerve will be stimulated using single 1 ms square-wave pulses applied over the popliteal fossa.

The test sequence will be randomized between stable and unstable ankles, ensuring balanced measurements. H-reflex excitability will be assessed for both ankles before and after the protocol to determine neuromuscular adaptations.

at the baseline and end of the intervention, 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool
Time Frame: at the baseline and end of the intervention, 8 weeks
Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) containing a 9-item 30-point scale is a valid and reliable questionnaire for distinguishing and measuring the severity of functional instability (FI). Clinically, CAIT is an effective tool for evaluating the severity of FI, monitoring progress, and measuring treatment outcomes. In researches, the CAIT provides the identification, objective definition, and comparison of more homogenous subject groups. Participants scoring 25 or higher are less likely to have FI, while participants scoring 25 or lower are more likely to have FI.
at the baseline and end of the intervention, 8 weeks
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)
Time Frame: at the baseline and end of the intervention, 8 weeks
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a self-reported tool improved to assess the physical function of individuals with foot and ankle-related musculoskeletal disorders. The valid and reliable Turkish version of FAAM (FAAM-T) was used (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.97 for FAAM-ADL and 0.94 for the FAAM-S subscales), which is a 29-item questionnaire, including 21-item Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and 8-item Sports subscales. Each answer is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4. The maximum score is 84 points for the ADL subscale and 32 points for the Sports subscale. The total score is calculated as a percentage score ranging from 0% to 100%.
at the baseline and end of the intervention, 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Berrin Aktekin, MD, Professor, Yeditepe University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Feyza Şule Hantal, PHd, Yeditepe University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • YeditepeU23

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Injuries

Clinical Trials on The structured balance training protocol

Subscribe