- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06900452
The Effect of Pistachio-Rich Breakfast Meals on Cognitive Function in Healthy Older Adults (PACVAN)
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Cognitive, Vascular, Neural and Biochemical Effects of Acute Pistachio Intervention in Older Adults
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Claire Williams, PhD
- Phone Number: 0118 378 7540
- Email: claire.williams@reading.ac.uk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Lynne Bell, PhD
- Phone Number: 0118 378 8313
- Email: l.bell@reading.ac.uk
Study Locations
-
-
Berkshire
-
Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom, RG6 6ES
- Recruiting
- Nutrition, Cognition & Health Lab, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 65 - 80 years old
- Fruit & veg intake less than or equal to 4 servings per day
- Not regularly consuming more than 3 servings of fish per week
- Adequate English language and visual & auditory acuity to perform the cognitive tasks
- Normal BMI for age
- Normal MMSE performance between 26-30
Exclusion Criteria:
- Being diagnosed with psychological or psychiatric disorders
- ADHD or dyslexia
- Any food allergy or intolerance
- Use of medications and dietary supplements that may impact study results
- Antibiotic use within the last 3 months
- Adherence to vegan or vegetarian diets, or other specific diets that may impact study outcomes
- Being diagnosed with cardiometabolic disease (including type II diabetes and cardiovascular disease), or suffer from untreated hypertension or thrombosis related disorders
- Taking blood thinners
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Macronutrient-matched placebo breakfast meal
|
Macronutrient-matched placebo breakfast meal.
Ingredients: 40g muesli base, 150g full fat natural yoghurt, 25g unsalted butter (melted), 15g unflavoured whey powder
|
|
Experimental: 0.5 servings of pistachio
0.5 servings of pistachio (15g) administered in breakfast meal
|
The equivalent of 0.5 servings (15g) of shelled, roasted pistachio nuts, crushed and mixed into a muesli-based breakfast meal for consumption. Ingredients: 15g pistachio, 35g muesli base, 150g full fat natural yoghurt, 15g unsalted butter (melted), 10g unflavoured whey powder |
|
Experimental: 1 serving of pistachio
1 serving of pistachio (30g) administered in breakfast meal
|
The equivalent of 1 serving (30g) of shelled, roasted pistachio nuts, crushed and mixed into a muesli-based breakfast meal for consumption. Ingredients: 30g pistachio, 35g muesli base, 150g full fat natural yoghurt, 10g unsalted butter (melted), 5g unflavoured whey powder |
|
Experimental: 2 servings of pistachio
2 servings of pistachio (60g) administered in breakfast meal
|
The equivalent of 2 servings (60g) of shelled, roasted pistachio nuts, crushed and mixed into a muesli-based breakfast meal for consumption. Ingredients: 60g pistachios, 25g muesli base, 150g low fat natural yoghurt |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Delayed recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list.
After 5 presentations, a new list (list B) is presented and recalled, and finally participants are asked (without hearing list A again) to recall as many words as they can from list A. After a 30 minute period, participants are asked to think back to the task and recall as many words as possible from list A only, providing a measure of delayed recall.
|
Baseline
|
|
Delayed recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list.
After 5 presentations, a new list (list B) is presented and recalled, and finally participants are asked (without hearing list A again) to recall as many words as they can from list A. After a 30 minute period, participants are asked to think back to the task and recall as many words as possible from list A only, providing a measure of delayed recall.
|
2 hours
|
|
Delayed recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list.
After 5 presentations, a new list (list B) is presented and recalled, and finally participants are asked (without hearing list A again) to recall as many words as they can from list A. After a 30 minute period, participants are asked to think back to the task and recall as many words as possible from list A only, providing a measure of delayed recall.
|
4 hours
|
|
Delayed recall (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list.
After 5 presentations, a new list (list B) is presented and recalled, and finally participants are asked (without hearing list A again) to recall as many words as they can from list A. After a 30 minute period, participants are asked to think back to the task and recall as many words as possible from list A only, providing a measure of delayed recall.
|
6 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of learning (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 sequential words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list.
Scores are recorded as a percentage of accuracy, and the rate of learning is determined through change in accuracy across the 5 recalls.
|
Baseline
|
|
Rate of learning (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 sequential words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list.
Scores are recorded as a percentage of accuracy, and the rate of learning is determined through change in accuracy across the 5 recalls.
|
2 hours
|
|
Rate of learning (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 sequential words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list.
Scores are recorded as a percentage of accuracy, and the rate of learning is determined through change in accuracy across the 5 recalls.
|
4 hours
|
|
Rate of learning (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
The RAVLT is a verbal learning task that presents participants with 15 sequential words (list A) 5 times, giving participants one minute after each presentation to recall as many words as they can from the list.
Scores are recorded as a percentage of accuracy, and the rate of learning is determined through change in accuracy across the 5 recalls.
|
6 hours
|
|
Word recognition (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Following the delayed word recall, words from list A, list B and novel words are displayed sequentially on the screen and participants are asked to indicate which words were from list A only.
|
Baseline
|
|
Word recognition (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
Following the delayed word recall, words from list A, list B and novel words are displayed sequentially on the screen and participants are asked to indicate which words were from list A only.
|
2 hours
|
|
Word recognition (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Following the delayed word recall, words from list A, list B and novel words are displayed sequentially on the screen and participants are asked to indicate which words were from list A only.
|
4 hours
|
|
Word recognition (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Task)
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
Following the delayed word recall, words from list A, list B and novel words are displayed sequentially on the screen and participants are asked to indicate which words were from list A only.
|
6 hours
|
|
Modified Attention Network Task (MANT)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
This task examines execution function, attention and inhibition.
Participants respond to a centrally presented target arrow pointing to the left or the right by pressing the corresponding key on the keyboard.
The target arrow is flanked by arrows that point in the same (congruent) or opposite (incongruent) direction.
Previous studies have found that participants show larger latencies and more errors on incongruent trials when compared with congruent trials due to the conflicting interference of the incongruently facing arrows.
Response latencies to congruent trials reflect processing speed, while errors on incongruent trials indicate susceptibility to interference.
In this study participants will be presented with two blocks of the MANT - one normal block, and one block with the addition of serial 3s.
In the serial 3s block, participants will be asked to count backwards in 3s out loud while continuing to perform the MANT, increasing the level of cognitive demand.
|
Baseline
|
|
Modified Attention Network Task (MANT)
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
This task examines execution function, attention and inhibition.
Participants respond to a centrally presented target arrow pointing to the left or the right by pressing the corresponding key on the keyboard.
The target arrow is flanked by arrows that point in the same (congruent) or opposite (incongruent) direction.
Previous studies have found that participants show larger latencies and more errors on incongruent trials when compared with congruent trials due to the conflicting interference of the incongruently facing arrows.
Response latencies to congruent trials reflect processing speed, while errors on incongruent trials indicate susceptibility to interference.
In this study participants will be presented with two blocks of the MANT - one normal block, and one block with the addition of serial 3s.
In the serial 3s block, participants will be asked to count backwards in 3s out loud while continuing to perform the MANT, increasing the level of cognitive demand.
|
2 hours
|
|
Modified Attention Network Task (MANT)
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
This task examines execution function, attention and inhibition.
Participants respond to a centrally presented target arrow pointing to the left or the right by pressing the corresponding key on the keyboard.
The target arrow is flanked by arrows that point in the same (congruent) or opposite (incongruent) direction.
Previous studies have found that participants show larger latencies and more errors on incongruent trials when compared with congruent trials due to the conflicting interference of the incongruently facing arrows.
Response latencies to congruent trials reflect processing speed, while errors on incongruent trials indicate susceptibility to interference.
In this study participants will be presented with two blocks of the MANT - one normal block, and one block with the addition of serial 3s.
In the serial 3s block, participants will be asked to count backwards in 3s out loud while continuing to perform the MANT, increasing the level of cognitive demand.
|
4 hours
|
|
Modified Attention Network Task (MANT)
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
This task examines execution function, attention and inhibition.
Participants respond to a centrally presented target arrow pointing to the left or the right by pressing the corresponding key on the keyboard.
The target arrow is flanked by arrows that point in the same (congruent) or opposite (incongruent) direction.
Previous studies have found that participants show larger latencies and more errors on incongruent trials when compared with congruent trials due to the conflicting interference of the incongruently facing arrows.
Response latencies to congruent trials reflect processing speed, while errors on incongruent trials indicate susceptibility to interference.
In this study participants will be presented with two blocks of the MANT - one normal block, and one block with the addition of serial 3s.
In the serial 3s block, participants will be asked to count backwards in 3s out loud while continuing to perform the MANT, increasing the level of cognitive demand.
|
6 hours
|
|
Task Switching Task
Time Frame: Baseline
|
This task requires executive function and sustained attention, and provides a measure of cognitive flexibility.
Participants view a circle with 8 equally spaced radii, 2 of which form a bold bisecting line.
Numbers are chosen randomly from a set of 1-4 & 6-9 and displayed sequentially in a clockwise direction.
A response of higher or lower than 5 is made for trials below the bold line, and even or odd for numbers above the line.
Outcome measures include overall accuracy and reaction time (RT) on correct trials, as well as accuracy and RT on trials where there is a 'switch cost' from stimuli moving from below to above the bold line and vice versa.
|
Baseline
|
|
Task Switching Task
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
This task requires executive function and sustained attention, and provides a measure of cognitive flexibility.
Participants view a circle with 8 equally spaced radii, 2 of which form a bold bisecting line.
Numbers are chosen randomly from a set of 1-4 & 6-9 and displayed sequentially in a clockwise direction.
A response of higher or lower than 5 is made for trials below the bold line, and even or odd for numbers above the line.
Outcome measures include overall accuracy and reaction time (RT) on correct trials, as well as accuracy and RT on trials where there is a 'switch cost' from stimuli moving from below to above the bold line and vice versa.
|
2 hours
|
|
Task Switching Task
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
This task requires executive function and sustained attention, and provides a measure of cognitive flexibility.
Participants view a circle with 8 equally spaced radii, 2 of which form a bold bisecting line.
Numbers are chosen randomly from a set of 1-4 & 6-9 and displayed sequentially in a clockwise direction.
A response of higher or lower than 5 is made for trials below the bold line, and even or odd for numbers above the line.
Outcome measures include overall accuracy and reaction time (RT) on correct trials, as well as accuracy and RT on trials where there is a 'switch cost' from stimuli moving from below to above the bold line and vice versa.
|
4 hours
|
|
Task Switching Task
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
This task requires executive function and sustained attention, and provides a measure of cognitive flexibility.
Participants view a circle with 8 equally spaced radii, 2 of which form a bold bisecting line.
Numbers are chosen randomly from a set of 1-4 & 6-9 and displayed sequentially in a clockwise direction.
A response of higher or lower than 5 is made for trials below the bold line, and even or odd for numbers above the line.
Outcome measures include overall accuracy and reaction time (RT) on correct trials, as well as accuracy and RT on trials where there is a 'switch cost' from stimuli moving from below to above the bold line and vice versa.
|
6 hours
|
|
Corsi Block Tapping Task
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A standardised assessment of visuospatial working memory.
The task comprises nine identical squares fixed in a random arrangement on a screen.
Participants observe sequences of between two and nine blocks, which they then reproduce as accurately as possible by clicking with the mouse.
Outcomes include number of correct sequences identified as a percentage of accuracy, and number of correct blocks identified (not necessarily in the correct sequence).
Four versions of each sequence length are presented during the task.
A novel sequence will be presented on each occasion, the order of which will be counterbalanced across participants.
|
Baseline
|
|
Corsi Block Tapping Task
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
A standardised assessment of visuospatial working memory.
The task comprises nine identical squares fixed in a random arrangement on a screen.
Participants observe sequences of between two and nine blocks, which they then reproduce as accurately as possible by clicking with the mouse.
Outcomes include number of correct sequences identified as a percentage of accuracy, and number of correct blocks identified (not necessarily in the correct sequence).
Four versions of each sequence length are presented during the task.
A novel sequence will be presented on each occasion, the order of which will be counterbalanced across participants.
|
2 hours
|
|
Corsi Block Tapping Task
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
A standardised assessment of visuospatial working memory.
The task comprises nine identical squares fixed in a random arrangement on a screen.
Participants observe sequences of between two and nine blocks, which they then reproduce as accurately as possible by clicking with the mouse.
Outcomes include number of correct sequences identified as a percentage of accuracy, and number of correct blocks identified (not necessarily in the correct sequence).
Four versions of each sequence length are presented during the task.
A novel sequence will be presented on each occasion, the order of which will be counterbalanced across participants.
|
4 hours
|
|
Corsi Block Tapping Task
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
A standardised assessment of visuospatial working memory.
The task comprises nine identical squares fixed in a random arrangement on a screen.
Participants observe sequences of between two and nine blocks, which they then reproduce as accurately as possible by clicking with the mouse.
Outcomes include number of correct sequences identified as a percentage of accuracy, and number of correct blocks identified (not necessarily in the correct sequence).
Four versions of each sequence length are presented during the task.
A novel sequence will be presented on each occasion, the order of which will be counterbalanced across participants.
|
6 hours
|
|
N-back task
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The N-Back task is a measure of working memory where participants are instructed to monitor a series of stimuli and to respond whenever a stimulus is presented that is the same as the one presented n trials previously.
In this simplified 0-back version, participants respond when the target matches a fixed target specified at the beginning of the task (similar to a Go/No-Go task).
Data will be analysed for both accuracy and reaction time on correct trials.
For a subset of participants, this task will be conducted while recording EEG (6 hours only) in order to monitor change in brain activity in response to target trials.
The N-Back was selected as it has been shown in previous work to elicit a strong P300 signal (see EEG as additional outcome).
|
Baseline
|
|
N-back task
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
The N-Back task is a measure of working memory where participants are instructed to monitor a series of stimuli and to respond whenever a stimulus is presented that is the same as the one presented n trials previously.
In this simplified 0-back version, participants respond when the target matches a fixed target specified at the beginning of the task (similar to a Go/No-Go task).
Data will be analysed for both accuracy and reaction time on correct trials.
For a subset of participants, this task will be conducted while recording EEG (6 hours only) in order to monitor change in brain activity in response to target trials.
The N-Back was selected as it has been shown in previous work to elicit a strong P300 signal (see EEG as additional outcome).
|
2 hours
|
|
N-back task
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
The N-Back task is a measure of working memory where participants are instructed to monitor a series of stimuli and to respond whenever a stimulus is presented that is the same as the one presented n trials previously.
In this simplified 0-back version, participants respond when the target matches a fixed target specified at the beginning of the task (similar to a Go/No-Go task).
Data will be analysed for both accuracy and reaction time on correct trials.
For a subset of participants, this task will be conducted while recording EEG (6 hours only) in order to monitor change in brain activity in response to target trials.
The N-Back was selected as it has been shown in previous work to elicit a strong P300 signal (see EEG as additional outcome).
|
4 hours
|
|
N-back task
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
The N-Back task is a measure of working memory where participants are instructed to monitor a series of stimuli and to respond whenever a stimulus is presented that is the same as the one presented n trials previously.
In this simplified 0-back version, participants respond when the target matches a fixed target specified at the beginning of the task (similar to a Go/No-Go task).
Data will be analysed for both accuracy and reaction time on correct trials.
For a subset of participants, this task will be conducted while recording EEG (6 hours only) in order to monitor change in brain activity in response to target trials.
The N-Back was selected as it has been shown in previous work to elicit a strong P300 signal (see EEG as additional outcome).
|
6 hours
|
|
EEG (ERPs & PSD)
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
Event related potential (ERP) measure of P300 & N200 latency and amplitude will be assessed using EEG (electroencephalography) in a subset of participants during resting state (eyes open and closed) and during the N-Back task. Additionally, power for Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Theta bands during performance of the N-Back task will be assessed in these participants. EEG data will be collected using Brain Products software and 16-channel active electrodes. |
6 hours
|
|
Blood markers
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
Blood samples will be collected 6 hours post-intervention to measure to following serum markers: BDNF, irisin, IGF-1 and cytokines (IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α).
Samples will be analysed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
|
6 hours
|
|
Flow mediated dilation (FMD)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
A subset of participants will complete FMD assessment prior to each cognitive task battery (baseline, 2, 4 and 6 hours).
FMD is a non-invasive ultrasound technique that measures how the brachial artery dilates in response to increased blood flow following occlusion.
Participants are required to lie down for 15 minutes before scanning commences.
The procedure then takes 9 minutes: the brachial artery is first scanned for 1 minute, a blood pressure cuff is then inflated on the forearm for 5 minutes, before being released and the artery scanned for a further 3 minutes.
This data will be analysed using Cardiovascular Suit.
During FMD, laser doppler flowometry (LDF) will also be measured using the index finger of the right arm and analysed for % PORH (post occlusive reactive hyperaemia), measured in flux units .
|
Baseline
|
|
Flow mediated dilation (FMD)
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
A subset of participants will complete FMD assessment prior to each cognitive task battery (baseline, 2, 4 and 6 hours).
FMD is a non-invasive ultrasound technique that measures how the brachial artery dilates in response to increased blood flow following occlusion.
Participants are required to lie down for 15 minutes before scanning commences.
The procedure then takes 9 minutes: the brachial artery is first scanned for 1 minute, a blood pressure cuff is then inflated on the forearm for 5 minutes, before being released and the artery scanned for a further 3 minutes.
This data will be analysed using Cardiovascular Suit.
During FMD, laser doppler flowometry (LDF) will also be measured using the index finger of the right arm and analysed for % PORH (post occlusive reactive hyperaemia), measured in flux units .
|
2 hours
|
|
Flow mediated dilation (FMD)
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
A subset of participants will complete FMD assessment prior to each cognitive task battery (baseline, 2, 4 and 6 hours).
FMD is a non-invasive ultrasound technique that measures how the brachial artery dilates in response to increased blood flow following occlusion.
Participants are required to lie down for 15 minutes before scanning commences.
The procedure then takes 9 minutes: the brachial artery is first scanned for 1 minute, a blood pressure cuff is then inflated on the forearm for 5 minutes, before being released and the artery scanned for a further 3 minutes.
This data will be analysed using Cardiovascular Suit.
During FMD, laser doppler flowometry (LDF) will also be measured using the index finger of the right arm and analysed for % PORH (post occlusive reactive hyperaemia), measured in flux units .
|
4 hours
|
|
Flow mediated dilation (FMD)
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
A subset of participants will complete FMD assessment prior to each cognitive task battery (baseline, 2, 4 and 6 hours).
FMD is a non-invasive ultrasound technique that measures how the brachial artery dilates in response to increased blood flow following occlusion.
Participants are required to lie down for 15 minutes before scanning commences.
The procedure then takes 9 minutes: the brachial artery is first scanned for 1 minute, a blood pressure cuff is then inflated on the forearm for 5 minutes, before being released and the artery scanned for a further 3 minutes.
This data will be analysed using Cardiovascular Suit.
During FMD, laser doppler flowometry (LDF) will also be measured using the index finger of the right arm and analysed for % PORH (post occlusive reactive hyperaemia), measured in flux units .
|
6 hours
|
|
Raven's Progressive Matrices
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Raven's is a non-verbal intelligence test designed to assess abstract reasoning and fluid intelligence which provides a single score (the sum of correct answers).
Ravens will be included in the present study at baseline as a measure of IQ, which may later be utilised as a covariate when analysing the cognitive data.
|
Baseline
|
|
Epic-Norfolk Food Frequency Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The FFQ is a validated tool for gauging the average habitual dietary intake of micro and macronutrients of an individual in the UK.
Data will be processed using the FETA software.
|
Baseline
|
|
Blood pressure
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial left arm cuffed systolic and diastolic blood pressure mmHg.
|
Baseline
|
|
Blood pressure
Time Frame: 2 hours
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial left arm cuffed systolic and diastolic blood pressure mmHg.
|
2 hours
|
|
Blood pressure
Time Frame: 4 hours
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial left arm cuffed systolic and diastolic blood pressure mmHg.
|
4 hours
|
|
Blood pressure
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
Average (triplicate) resting brachial left arm cuffed systolic and diastolic blood pressure mmHg.
|
6 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Claire Williams, PhD, University of Reading
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024-236-CW
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cognition
-
Westlake UniversityThe Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou; Affiliated Hangzhou First People's...Not yet recruiting
-
Huashan HospitalChinese Academy of SciencesRecruiting
-
RenJi HospitalShanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineRecruiting
-
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child...National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC); United States Department... and other collaboratorsCompletedCognitionUnited States
-
University of MinnesotaUniversity of California, San Francisco; Posit Science CorporationCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompleted
-
University Hospital, GrenobleTerminated
-
Newcastle UniversityCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCambridge Cognition LtdCompleted
-
University of LeedsWelch's, Inc.Completed
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AkesoNot yet recruitingAtopic DermatitisChina
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalUnknownHypertension | DyslipidemiasKorea, Republic of
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States