Physical Activity in Persons With Parkinson's Disease (ActivPARK)

April 1, 2025 updated by: Erika Franzén, Karolinska Institutet

ActivPARK - Physical Activity in Persons With Parkinson's Disease- Pilot Study

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a leading neurodegenerative health condition in Sweden and a public health concern. Although no cure exists, functional independence and participation in society remain top priorities, and can be achieved through targeted physical activity (PA) interventions. To date, few longitudinal cohort studies have been conducted, using PA as main outcome in therapy research, partly due to the complex nature of predicting and controlling this phenomenon. To help address this knowledge gap, the overall purpose of the future long-term (ActivPARK) study is to enhance knowledge of the evolution of PA behavior, and how it is influenced beyond the disease characteristics using a broad explanatory model, in persons with PD from a diversity of settings in Sweden with the aim of prescribing tailored and personalized interventions to enhance functioning, health, and wellbeing throughout the disease progression and recommend potential health care pathway modifications.

The investigators have just established an expert group, comprising researchers, healthcare professionals, and PD organisations (including persons with PD) and reached consensus on essential priority clinical therapy research questions on PA and methodological considerations. The next phase entails performing a multicentre feasibility/pilot study, further developing and refining the assessment battery and research questions linked to the improved explanatory model for PA and methodology, to inform the definite larger clinical cohort study.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Compliance Office Karolinska Insitutet
  • Phone Number: +46852480000
  • Email: compliance@ki.se

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Solna
      • Stockholm, Solna, Sweden, 17177
        • Recruiting
        • Karolinska Institutet
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Erika Franzén, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Parkinson's disease with mild to severe severity (Hoehn & Yahr 1-4) of all ages

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with Parkinson's disease
  • Mild to severe disease severity ( Hoehn & Yahr 1-4).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
People with Parkinson's disease
No intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity levels
Time Frame: Baseline
The ActiGraph accelerometer (GT3X+, ActiGraph, Pensacola, FL, US) will be used to measure absolute and relative time spent in sedentary behavior, low intensity physical activity (LIPA) and moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA), by total time in bouts.
Baseline
Feasibility of the assessment battery - length of the clinical examination and questionnaires
Time Frame: Baseline
The pilot/feasibility study aims to evaluate feasibility of the assessment battery measured the time it takes to complete the examination and questionnaires.
Baseline
Feasibility of the assessment battery - perception of the clinical examination
Time Frame: Baseline
Feasibility of the assessment battery will also be evaluated through semi-structured questions regarding fatique, concentration, pain/discomfort to the participants after the clinical examination.
Baseline
Feasibility of the assessment battery -Compliance to questionnaires sent via REDCap
Time Frame: Baselline
Compliance will be measured with percentages of completed questionnaires in REDCap.
Baselline
Feasibility of the assessment battery - Suitability of the primary outcome
Time Frame: Baseline
Suitability of the accelerometers in the home environment as the primary outcome for the targeted patient group will be assessed by the percentage of participants that are able to wear the accelerometer for at least 4 days days and render valid data.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity - self rated
Time Frame: Baseline
Frändin Grimby scale, ranging from 1 to 6, higher score=better.
Baseline
Disease severity, Parkinson symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline

Movement Disorders Society- Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS- UPDRS) parts 1 to 4.

Higher scores = worse/more symptoms

Baseline
Gait
Time Frame: Baseline
Gait speed in m/s measured with the 10 meter walking test or through gait analysis.
Baseline
Balance performance
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed with the Mini-BESTest. Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test a rating scale for dynamic balance incorporating 14 different balance and gait items that were assessed by a physical therapist on a scale from 0-2. Maximum points 28. 0-28 points with higher scores indicating better balance control
Baseline
Anxiety and depression
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), 0-24 on the depression and anxiety part respectively. Lower score=better
Baseline
Cognitive performance
Time Frame: Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), 0-25, higher score = better
Baseline and 3 year follow-up
Self assessed cognitive function
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed with Executive function questionnaire (DEX), 20 items scored 1 to 4, max 80, more scores= worse.
Baseline
Non-Motor Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline
Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (NMSQ), 30 questions with yes/no answer. More yes answers = more non-motor symptoms
Baseline
Walking ability- self assessed
Time Frame: Baseline
WALK-12G questionnaire, 0 and 42 points, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived walking difficulties (higher=worse)
Baseline
Freezing of gait - self-assessed
Time Frame: Baseline
Freezing of gait questionnaire (FOGQsa), 6 questions/items, scored 1 to 5 (higher=worse)
Baseline
Balance confidence
Time Frame: Baseline
Activities specific balance confidence (ABC scale), 16 items which is scored 1 to 10 and then divided by 16. 0-100%, higher % = better
Baseline
Motivation
Time Frame: Baseline
Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ 4), 28 items score 1 to 7 and divided into subcomponents: Amotivation, External regulation, Introjected avoidance, Introjected approach, Identified regulation, Integrated regulation, Intrinsic regulation
Baseline
Fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline
Parkinson's Fatigue Scale (PFS-16), 16 items scored 1 to 5 from strongly disagree to strongly agree . more points/score= worse.
Baseline
Disability
Time Frame: Baseline
World health organization (WHO) disability assessment schedule (Whodas 2.0), 12 self-assessed questions (12 to 60) more points=worse
Baseline
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline
Self-efficacy of exercise/PA (ESES), 10 questions, scored 1-4. higher=better
Baseline
Sleep
Time Frame: Baseline
Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease - Sleep (SCOPA-SLEEP), 4 parts, A-2 questions, B-5 questions , C-1 question and D- 6 questions. Higher= worse
Baseline
Self rated pain
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed with visual analog scale, VAS from 0 to 100
Baseline
Health related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline
Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ39). The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) assesses how often people with Parkinson's experience difficulties across 8 dimensions of daily living (mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognitions, communications and bodily discomfort). The sum score is as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. Higher is better
Baseline
Wellbeing
Time Frame: Baseline
The WHO- Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5), 5 questions ranging from 0 to 5, 0-25, higher=better
Baseline
Nutrition
Time Frame: Baseline
Mini Nutritional Assessment, max 14. higher = better
Baseline

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Working och long-term memory
Time Frame: Baseline
Rey-Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), higher= better
Baseline
Parkinson related pain
Time Frame: Baseline
Assessed with the Kings Parkinsons Pain Scale (KPPS), max 168, higher= more pain
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erika Franzén, Karolinska Institutet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024-07526-01 (Other Identifier: Swedish Ethical Review Authority)
  • 2024-06332 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Swedish Research Council)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to Swedish and EU personal data legislation but are available from the principal investigator on reasonable request. Any sharing of data will be regulated via a data transfer and user agreement with the recipient, provided that the recipient has an approved ethics application.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The investigators plan to share this when applicable on OSF or similar

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to Swedish and EU personal data legislation but are available from the principal investigator on reasonable request. Any sharing of data will be regulated via a data transfer and user agreement with the recipient.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Subscribe