PCSK9 Inhibitor With Statin Therapy for Asymptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis (PISTIAS-2)

August 3, 2025 updated by: Wei-Hai Xu, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

PCSK9 Inhibitor With Statin Therapy for Asymptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerosis (PISTIAS-2): A Multicenter, Open-label, Blinded-endpoint, Randomized Controlled Trial

This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitor combined with statin therapy compared to statin monotherapy in reversing asymptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis, assessed using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the intracranial vessel walls.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a leading cause of ischemic stroke worldwide, accounting for approximately 10-20% of all ischemic strokes in Europe and the United States, and up to 50% in Asian populations. While evidence-based management strategies for symptomatic ICAS have been progressively established over the past decades, asymptomatic ICAS - representing an earlier-stage, broader, high-risk population - has long been under-recognized and under-studied. Asymptomatic ICAS (stenosis > 50%) has a reported prevalence of approximately 6%-13%, and is associated with a substantially increased risk of future cerebrovascular events. Moreover, accumulating evidence has demonstrated that asymptomatic ICAS is independently associated with cognitive decline and incident dementia, likely due to chronic downstream hypo-perfusion and cumulative ischemic injury. Therefore, the development of systematic, evidence-based, and precision prevention strategies for asymptomatic ICAS is essential for reducing the overall disease burden attributable to ICAS-related cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative disorders.

It is well established that dysregulation of lipid metabolism is a fundamental pathophysiological mechanism driving the initiation and progression of ICAS, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been consistently identified as the primary therapeutic target for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and for the prevention of ischemic stroke. Existing evidence has demonstrated that reductions in lipid levels and the regression of atherosclerotic plaques are closely associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular events. Statin therapy remains the cornerstone of lipid-lowering treatment, capable of stabilizing atherosclerotic plaques and improving clinical outcomes. However, limitations of statins such as the plateau effect of LDL-C reduction, intolerance, and poor adherence in certain patients necessitate alternative or adjunctive lipid-lowering strategies. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, human monoclonal antibodies targeting PCSK9, have shown excellent efficacy in achieving intensive LDL-C reduction and have been extensively validated for safety in large clinical trials. Recently published studies have highlighted the potential of PCSK9 inhibitors in plaque regression and stabilization beyond coronary and carotid arteries. The SLICE-CEA CardioLink-8 trial demonstrated that adding evolocumab to moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy for 6 months significantly reduced the lipid-rich necrotic core in asymptomatic high-risk carotid plaques. Similarly, the ARCHITECT study revealed that alirocumab in combination with high-intensity statin therapy led to significant regression of coronary plaque burden and enhanced plaque stability in asymptomatic patients over a 78-week period. Several observational studies have indicated that intensive lipid-lowering therapy may reverse asymptomatic ICAS. However, to date, no clinical trials have specifically evaluated the efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors in addition to statin therapy in patients with asymptomatic ICAS. This represents a critical evidence gap, as these patients constitute a broader, earlier, and high-risk population for cerebrovascular events.

The PISTIAS-2 is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, prospective, open-label, blinded end-point, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitor combined with statin therapy compared to statin monotherapy in patients with asymptomatic ICAS. Patients aged 18 to 60 years with asymptomatic ICAS, defined as 50% to 99% stenosis in at least one major intracranial artery without a prior history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, will be enrolled for 24-week treatment. Eligible participants will be centrally randomized into two groups: (1) Experimental group [PCSK9 inhibitor combined with statin therapy]: Recaticimab 450 mg every 12 weeks combined with rosuvastatin 10 mg q.n. or atorvastatin 20 mg q.n. (2) Control group [Statin alone]: Rosuvastatin 10 mg q.n. or atorvastatin 20 mg q.n. Considering inter-individual variability in lipid-lowering response, ezetimibe 10 mg once daily is permitted at the discretion of the study physician based on the predefined criteria: (1) patients already receiving statin therapy prior to enrollment whose LDL-C remains above 2.6 mmol/L, and (2) statin-naïve patients whose LDL-C exceeds 2.6 mmol/L at the 12-week lipid profile reassessment. In this trial, we employed a novel PCSK9 inhibitor, Recaticimab, a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody engineered with a strategic YTE mutation in its Fc region, which enhances its affinity for the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). This modification reduces FcRn-mediated antibody catabolism, thereby extending the half-life of Recaticimab and enabling a prolonged dosing interval of up to 12 weeks.

The primary outcome is the change in intracranial plaque burden from baseline to week 24, measured by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI).The key secondary outcomes include: change in stenosis degree from baseline to week 24, time from randomization to the first-ever ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, and change in plasma marker glial fibrillary acidic protein(GFAP) and neurofilament light (NfL). Other secondary outcomes include: time from randomization to the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, new-onset silent cerebral infarction, percentage of patients who achieved LDL-C goal at week 24, percentage change in LDL-C relative to baseline, and change in plasma marker Aβ40, Aβ42, Aβ42/Aβ40. In addition, several pre-specified exploratory outcomes have been defined for this study. Details are provided in the "Outcome Measures" section.

After the 24-week treatment period, an extended prospective follow-up (clinical or telephone follow-up) will continue for more than one year to document long-term effects.The sample size is calculated based on the primary outcome and a total of 300 participants are anticipated. An interim analysis will be conducted when 50% of the participants (i.e., 150 subjects) have completed the 24-week follow-up with HR-MRI. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board will oversee the overall conduct of the trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Weihai Xu, MD
  • Phone Number: 86+13651147766
  • Email: xuwh@pumch.cn

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Chongqing, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Chongqing General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jingxi Ma, MD
      • Shanghai, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jianhui Fu, MD
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100853
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Chinese PLA General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shiwen Wu, MD
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Recruiting
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
        • Contact:
          • Weihai Xu, MD
          • Phone Number: 86+13651147766
          • Email: xuwh@pumch.cn
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Weihai Xu, MD
    • Guangdong
      • Meizhou, Guangdong, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Yuedong Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ying Bian, MD
    • Hebei
      • Cangzhou, Hebei, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yonglin Shan, MD
      • Qinhuangdao, Hebei, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Peking University Third Hospital Qinhuangdao Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yaqun Liu, MD
      • Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China, 050051
        • Recruiting
        • Hebei Provincial People's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hebo Wang, MD
      • Tangshan, Hebei, China, 063000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Tangshan Worker's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Baoquan Lu, MD
    • Heilongjiang
      • Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hongquan Jiang, MD
    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bo Song, MD
    • Hubei
      • Shiyan, Hubei, China, 442000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Taihe Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Zhibing Ai, MD
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bin Mei, MD
    • Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region
      • Baotou, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China, 014000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Baotou Central Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jingfen Zhang, MD
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Nanjing First Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Qiwen Deng, MD
    • Shandong
      • Jining, Shandong, China, 272000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Jining First People's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Zhongrui Yan, MD
      • Liaocheng, Shandong, China, 252000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Liaocheng People's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Guanzeng Li, MD
      • Qingdao, Shandong, China
        • Not yet recruiting
        • The Affiliated Hospital Of Qingdao University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Naidong Wang, MD
      • Weifang, Shandong, China, 261000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Weifang People's Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Li Zhou, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 and ≤60, male or female;
  2. Asymptomatic intracranial artery stenosis (50%-99%) in the internal carotid artery (C6-7 segments), middle cerebral artery (M1 segment), vertebral artery (V4 segment), or basilar artery, confirmed by angiography (MRA, CTA, or DSA);
  3. Atherosclerosis identified as the cause of intracranial artery stenosis by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging;
  4. No previous ischemic cerebrovascular events (including ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack).
  5. Baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥ 2.6 mmol/L;
  6. Informed consent signed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-atherosclerotic intracranial artery stenosis, including arterial dissection; moya moya disease; systemic vasculitis and primary central nervous system vasculitis; varicella-zoster vasculopathy or other viral vasculopathy; neurosyphilis and other intracranial infections, radiation vasculopathy; fibromuscular dysplasia, sickle cell disease, neurofibromatosis; reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome; postpartum vasculopathy; suspected vasospasm, suspected reperfusion after vessel occlusion.
  2. Upstream tandem extracranial vessel stenosis (≥50%) adjacent to the target intracranial stenotic vessel.
  3. Previous treatment of target intracranial lesion with endovascular intervention or plan to perform endovascular intervention within 6 months, including intracranial stenting, endovascular angioplasty, and thrombectomy.
  4. Any intracranial hemorrhage (parenchymal, subarachnoid, subdural, extradural, intraventricular) within 90 days prior to enrollment.
  5. Presence of intracranial tumors.
  6. Presence of cerebral aneurysms or arteriovenous malformations with indications for interventional therapy.
  7. Major surgery (including open femoral, aortic, or carotid surgery) within previous 30 days or planned in the next 6 months after enrollment.
  8. Presence of any of the following unequivocal cardiac sources of embolism: mitral stenosis, mechanical valve, endocarditis, intracardiac clot or vegetation, myocardial infarction within 3 months, dilated cardiomyopathy, chronic or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
  9. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV, or known left ventricular ejection fraction < 30%.
  10. Severe liver dysfunction or severe kidney dysfunction: AST and/or ALT > 3 times the ULN; creatinine clearance < 0.6 mL/s and/or serum creatinine > 265 μmol/L (>3.0 mg/dL); CK >5 times the ULN at screening.
  11. Active bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy (e.g., active peptic ulcer disease, major systemic hemorrhage within 30 days, active bleeding diathesis, platelets count < 125,000 / uL, hematocrit < 30%, Hgb < 10 g/dl, international normalized ratio >1.5, bleeding time > 1 minute beyond normal value upper limit).
  12. Presence of systemic autoimmune diseases: systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's syndrome, Behçet's disease, mixed connective tissue disease, IgG4-related disease.
  13. Dementia or psychiatric problem that hinder their ability to consistently adhere to an outpatient program. Co-morbid conditions that may limit the life expectancy to less than 3 years.
  14. Relative/absolute contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (such as presence of internal metallic objects, claustrophobia, contrast agent allergy, severe renal impairment, epilepsy, hypotension, asthma, and other hypersensitivity respiratory diseases).
  15. Uncontrolled hypertension during the screening period, defined as seated systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 110 mmHg.
  16. Prior use of PCSK9 inhibitor before this recruitment.
  17. Known intolerance or allergy to statin.
  18. Pregnancy, lactation, or planning pregnancy.
  19. Currently participating in another study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Recaticimab plus Statin Group
Recaticimab (450mg every 12 weeks subcutaneously) combined with rosuvastatin 10mg qn or atorvastatin 20mg qn
Recaticimab (450mg every 12 weeks subcutaneously) combined with rosuvastatin 10mg qn or atorvastatin 20mg qn
Active Comparator: Statin Group
Rosuvastatin 10mg qn or atorvastatin 20mg qn
Rosuvastatin 10mg qn or atorvastatin 20mg qn

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in plaque burden from baseline to week 24
Time Frame: From baselie to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Intracranial plaque burden was assessed at maximum stenosis site by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, performed at baseline and the end of the treatment period (24 [±1] week) on the same machine. The plaque burden is calculated according to the following formula: plaque burden = [(vessel wall cross-sectional area - lumen cross-sectional area ) / vessel wall cross-sectional area] ×100%. The outcome will be centrally assessed by an independent core imaging laboratory blinded to treatment allocation according to a predefined imaging analysis protocol.
From baselie to the end of treatment at 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in stenosis degree from baseline to week 24
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
The degree of stenosis is calculated according to the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) criteria using the formula: [1-(Dstenosis/Dnormal)]×100%. Dstenosis represents the vessel diameter at the most stenotic site of the intracranial artery, and Dnormal represents the normal vessel diameter at a reference site.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the first-ever ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks

Ischemic Stroke: Defined as an acute cerebral infarction with clinical signs or imaging evidence of a new acute focal neurological injury persisting for more than 24 hours, excluding other non-ischemic causes.

Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA): Defined as a sudden onset of focal neurological deficit due to cerebral or retinal ischemia, which completely resolves within 24 hours. Imaging (CT or MRI) must show no evidence of a new cerebral infarction. Other non-ischemic causes, such as brain infection, trauma, tumor, epilepsy, severe metabolic disorders, or progressive neurological diseases, must be excluded.

From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in plasma marker glial fibrillary acidic protein(GFAP)
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in plasma marker glial fibrillary acidic protein(GFAP) quantified using the Single Molecule Array platform from baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in plasma marker neurofilament light(NfL)
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in plasma marker Neurofilament light(NfL) quantified using the Single Molecule Array platform from baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Composite major adverse cardiovascular endpoints includes ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular mortality as a cluster
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Silent cerebral infarction
Time Frame: at 24 weeks of treatment
New-onset silent cerebral infarction is defined as an imaging-detected infarct without acute clinical symptoms
at 24 weeks of treatment
Percentage of patients who achieved LDL-C goal at week 24
Time Frame: at 24 weeks of treatment
Percentage of patients achieving the LDL-C target at week 24 of treatment, defined as LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L or LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L based on ASCVD risk assessment.
at 24 weeks of treatment
Percentage change in LDL-C relative to baseline
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Percentage change in LDL-C level at 24 weeks of treatment relative to baseline
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in Plasma marker Aβ42/Aβ40
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in plasma markers Aβ42/Aβ40 from baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time from randomization to the time of the first occurrence of transient ischemic attack
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA): Defined as a sudden onset of focal neurological deficit due to cerebral or retinal ischemia, which completely resolves within 24 hours. Imaging (CT or MRI) must show no evidence of a new cerebral infarction. Other non-ischemic causes, such as brain infection, trauma, tumor, epilepsy, severe metabolic disorders, or progressive neurological diseases, must be excluded.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the time of the first occurrence of ischemic stroke
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Ischemic Stroke: Defined as an acute cerebral infarction with clinical signs or imaging evidence of a new acute focal neurological injury persisting for more than 24 hours, excluding other non-ischemic causes.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the time of the occurrence of any stroke
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Any stroke includes ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the time of the occurrence of myocardial infarction
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the time of the occurrence of myocardial infarction
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the time of the occurrence of vascular death
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the time of the occurrence of vascular death
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Time from randomization to the time of the occurrence of any death
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
All-cause mortality will be calculated between two arms
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Changes in cognitive scale scores
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Cognitive function will be evaluated via MMSE and MOCA at baseline and week 24
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Changes in traditional lipid parameters
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Changes in traditional lipid profiles, especially total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG) and HDL-C.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in Lipoprotein (a) level
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Non-traditional lipid parameters such as Lipoprotein (a) level will be detected at baseline and week 24
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Visit-to-visit lipid variability of LDL-C
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Lipid variability during the treatment period, which can be evaluated by the following indicators: coefficient of variation (CV), standard deviation (SD), variability independent of the mean (VIM), average real variability (ARV).
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Inflammatory markers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) will be detected at baseline and week 24
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in plasma marker pTau217
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Markers of neurological disorders such asplasma marker pTau217 will be detected at baseline and week 24
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Changes in DNA methylation status of peripheral blood cells
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
DNA methylation, particularly RNF213, an important epigenetic factor, may play a role in the progression of ICAS.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Changes in Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Previous studies have shown that lipid-lowering has an obvious scavenging effect on senescent cells. Senescence associated β-galactosidase, SA-β-gal, is thought to be a sign of aging
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in length of plaque
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
length of plaque was evaluated by high-resolution MRI at baseline and week 24
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in plaque maximum thickness
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
the maximum thickness of plaque was evaluated by high-resolution MRI at baseline and week 24
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in the outer-wall boundary area at the maximal stenotic site
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
the outer-wall boundary area at the maximal stenotic site was evaluated by high-resolution MRI at baseline and week 24
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in remodeling index of the plaque
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Remodeling index of the plaque is calculated by the ratio of the diameter of the lumen at the most severe lesion to the diameter of the proximal reference lumen, positive remodeling defined as remodeling index > 1.1
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in plaque enhancement
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
plaque enhancement will be detected via contrast enhanced high- resolution MRI
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in brain volume
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Total brain volume will be evaluated by MRI 3D-T1WI at baseline and week 24
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in cortical thickness
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
The thickness and surface area of cerebral cortex in all and different brain regions were quantitatively determined based on MRI
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in cerebral small vessel disease burden
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
cerebral small vessel disease burden were quantitatively determined based on MRI at baseline and week 24
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in white matter hyperintensity
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
White matter hyperintensity (WMH) in all and different brain regions were quantitatively determined based on MRI
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Change in collateral circulation status
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Collateral circulation status will be assessed using standardized imaging-based grading scales to evaluate the extent and quality of collateral blood flow.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Adverse events
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
An Adverse Event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in clinical trial subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: (1) results in death; (2) is life-threatening; (3) requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; (4)results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; (5) is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; (6) is otherwise considered medically significant by the investigator.
From baseline to the end of treatment at 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intracranial Atherosclerosis

Clinical Trials on Recaticimab and Statin

Subscribe