A Virtual Life Story Club Intervention to Improve Loneliness and Apathy in Community-Dwelling Older Adults (LSC Feasible)

December 17, 2025 updated by: Montefiore Medical Center

A Virtual Life Story Club Intervention to Improve Loneliness and Apathy in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study

Reminiscence therapy is a non-invasive, non-pharmacological intervention that has been shown to improve cognition, mood, functional status, quality of life, and apathy in older adults. Group reminiscence therapy combines structured social engagement and recounting of personal stories that address both social connection (a risk factor for cognitive decline) and cognition. Life story club© (LSC) is an established, non-profit organization that provides virtual, group reminiscence therapy for older adults to reduce loneliness and promote a sense of belonging and has not been formally studied.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of a LSC© intervention to improve loneliness and apathy in community-dwelling older adults.

This pilot study will be conducted to compare loneliness and apathy in lonely individuals without dementia at baseline who receive a virtual group reminiscence therapy intervention (vGRT). The intervention will be delivered weekly over 12 weeks. Loneliness and apathy will be assessed before and after the intervention as described in the Outcome Measures section of this registration. Feasibility will be assessed using quantitative and qualitative measures including feasibility of screening and enrollment, acceptability, and program satisfaction. Qualitative interviews will be conducted with a subset of 30 individuals to explore acceptability, barriers, and facilitators of the intervention.

This study will provide evidence for the feasibility of a virtual group reminiscence therapy for community dwelling older adults to reduce loneliness and apathy. This approach is both innovative and pragmatic because it will leverage an existing community-based service, with an established infrastructure and track record within the community to deliver the intervention. As such, the proposed research has the potential for broad implications for community-based research and aligns with multiple translational science principles.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • The Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Recruiting
        • Montefiore Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 60 and over
  • English or Spanish fluency
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dementia based on Aging and Dementia (AD8) score of ≥4 or previous dementia diagnosis
  • Severe auditory or visual loss
  • Lack of access to internet connection or phone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Life Story Club
Virtual Group Reminiscence Therapy
Behavioral: Life Story Club
Virtual group reminiscence therapy will be provided by the Life Story Club©. Participants will meet virtually via Zoom© with their group (6-10 people) weekly for one hour over a 12-week period to exchange life stories and share in conversation. Groups will be conducted in entirely in English or Spanish, based on participant preference. Each week, the LSC© facilitator will guide the group with question prompts to encourage participants to share personal information, build friendships & rapport, and create a sense of community. LSC© facilitators are trained in group interview techniques, technology management, and know how to respond appropriately to sensitive information that may emerge during group exchanges.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Loneliness
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Loneliness will be assessed using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale questionnaire. The UCLA Loneliness Scale is a 20-item measure that assesses how often a person feels disconnected from others. Participants provide responses using a 4-point Likert scale where 1 = never; 2 = rarely; 3 = sometimes; 4 = always, for an overall possible scoring range of 20-80, such that higher scores are associated with increased loneliness. Positively worded items in the questionnaire must be reverse-coded before reporting. For purposes of this study changes from baseline to 3 months and baseline to 6 months will be assessed whereby positive values are indicative of an increase in loneliness from baseline and negative values a decrease in loneliness from baseline. Group scores will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics.
From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Change in Apathy
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Apathy will be assessed using the self-reported Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-S). The AES-S is an 18-item questionnaire that addresses characteristics of goal directed behavior that reflects apathy including behavioral, cognitive, and emotional indicators. Participants provide responses based on a 4-point Likert scale where 1 = not at all true; 2 = slightly true; 3 = somewhat true; and 4 = very true, for an overall possible scoring range of 18-72, such that higher scores are associated with greater apathy. Positively worded items in the scale must be reverse-coded before reporting. For purposes of this study changes from baseline to 3 months and baseline to 6 months will be assessed whereby positive values are indicative of increased apathy from baseline and negative values decreased apathy from baseline. Group scores will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics.
From baseline to 3 months and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in cognition
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Cognition will be assessed using a version of the Telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA). The T-MoCA is a 22-item phone-administered exam which assesses a range of global cognitive domains including attention, memory, language, and orientation. Each item is one point yielding an overall possible scoring range of 0-22, with higher scores being indicative of better cognitive function. Scores of 18 or below are generally suggestive of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). For purposes of this study changes from baseline to 3 months and baseline to 6 months will be assessed whereby positive values are indicative of increased cognition from baseline and negative values decreased cognition from baseline. Group scores will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics. To reduce practice effect Version (V)8.1 will be administered at baseline, V8.2 at 3 months, and V8.3 at 6 months. Scoring ranges are identical for all 3 versions.
From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Change in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Depressive symptoms will be assessed by administration of the Geriatric Depression Scale - Short Form (GDS-15), The GDS-15 is a 15-item questionnaire in which participants provide a dichotomous (Yes/No) response as to how they have felt over the prior week. Answers suggestive of depression are bolded/italicized on the questionnaire (may either be 'Yes' or 'No' depending on the item). A score of 1 point is assigned for each bolded/italicized response such that higher scores are associated with more depressive symptoms. A score of 0 to 5 is normal. A score greater than 5 suggests depression. For purposes of this study changes from baseline to 3 months and baseline to 6 months will be assessed whereby positive values are indicative of increase in depressive symptoms from baseline and negative values a decrease in depressive symptoms from baseline. Results will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics.
From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Change in Meaning and Purpose
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Meaning and purpose will be assessed as a composite measure using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Meaning and Purpose 4-item scale. The 4-item scale is designed to assess an individual's subjective experience of meaning and purpose in life. Participants provide responses on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1-5 for an overall possible scoring range of 4-20, such that higher scores are associated with greater meaning and purpose. For purposes of this study changes from baseline to 3 months and baseline to 6 months will be assessed whereby positive values are indicative of increased experiences of meaning and purpose from baseline and negative values decreased experiences of meaning and purpose from baseline. Group results will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics
From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Change in Social Support
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Social Support will be assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Scale. The MOS is a 19-item multidimensional, self-administered instrument that measures the availability of support, if needed. The overall social support component of the MOS Social Support scale will be used. Participants provide responses on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1-5 for an overall possible scoring range of 19-95, such that higher scores are associated with greater availability of social support. For purposes of this study changes from baseline to 3 months and baseline to 6 months will be assessed whereby positive values are indicative of increased social support and purpose from baseline and negative values decreased social support from baseline. Group results will be summarized using basic descriptive statistics
From baseline to 3 months and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Montefiore Medical Center

Collaborators

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mirnova Ceide, MD, Montefiore Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025-16787
  • UM1TR004400 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Data sharing to be determined.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Loneliness

Clinical Trials on Life Story Club

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in India

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe