This Study Aims to Quantify Decisional Regret as Well as Quality of Life in Patients With Low- to High-risk Cancer and High Burden of Symptoms Undergoing Radiotherapy Using Established Questionnaires. (DoItAgain)

April 3, 2025 updated by: Dr. med. Stephanie Bendrich, University Medical Center Goettingen

Decisional Regret Following Radiotherapy Against Cancer With Poor to Excellent Prognosis

In this prospective registry study, patients with low-, intermediate- and high-risk tumor entities as well as patients with high symptom burden of any tumor entity in palliative constellation with indication for radiation treatment are included. This radiation treatment can be applied either as 3D-conformal RT or IGRT. The duration of treatment can range from one day to several weeks. For the primary endpoint as well as the secondary clinical and other exploratory endpoints, the 3 groups will be compared in terms of DR, QoL, toxicities and treatment plan parameters

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Decisional regret and quality of life are quantified and analyzed using general linear models (e.g. linear regression models, ANOVA), taking into account covariates such as tumor stage, application of further systemic therapies, extent of the radiation area, occurrence of acute and/or late side effects. Survival time analyses and tumor control rates are evaluated using Kaplan- Meyer and Cox regression. Technical endpoints, quality of life and patient satisfaction will be described descriptively and compared between the cohorts using a mixed linear model.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

165

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Cohort 1: Patients with low-risk cancers Cohort 2: Patients with cancers in the intermediate and high risk profile Cohort 3: Patients with high symptom burden

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for radiotherapy
  • Patient information and declaration of consent
  • Patients age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • previous radiotherapy in affected site or same localisation in group 1-3
  • Inability to answer the questionnaires
  • Pre-existing conditions with increased risk of acute or late toxicity (LiFraumeni, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis)
  • Simultaneous participation in other studies that could interfere with this study and/or participation before expiry of a required restriction period
  • Persons who are in a dependent/employment relationship with the investigator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decisional Regret
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of routinely performed clinical follow-up examinations after 5 yeasr after RT start
Decisional Regret (DR) is measured by the German version of the Ottawa Decisional Regret Scale (Rühle et al. 2014) by answering the comprising 5 questions. Responses are provided on a five-point Likert scale. Decision regret is categorized as absent (0 points), mild (1-25 points) and strong (>25 points).
from enrollment to the end of routinely performed clinical follow-up examinations after 5 yeasr after RT start
Quality of Life after Radiotherapy
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of routinely performed clinical follow-up examinations after 5 yeasr after RT start
Quality of Life is measured using the 80 question comprising PRO-CTCAE questionnaire version 1.0 (Hagelstein et al 2016) , the 30 question comprising EORTC QLQC30 questionnaire version 3.0 and the PSQ-18 questionnaire (Thayaparan and Mahdi 2013). All questionnaires have been previously validated in other publications.
from enrollment to the end of routinely performed clinical follow-up examinations after 5 yeasr after RT start

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11/3/25

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Decision Making ,Shared

Subscribe