- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06921863
This Study Aims to Quantify Decisional Regret as Well as Quality of Life in Patients With Low- to High-risk Cancer and High Burden of Symptoms Undergoing Radiotherapy Using Established Questionnaires. (DoItAgain)
April 3, 2025 updated by: Dr. med. Stephanie Bendrich, University Medical Center Goettingen
Decisional Regret Following Radiotherapy Against Cancer With Poor to Excellent Prognosis
In this prospective registry study, patients with low-, intermediate- and high-risk tumor entities as well as patients with high symptom burden of any tumor entity in palliative constellation with indication for radiation treatment are included.
This radiation treatment can be applied either as 3D-conformal RT or IGRT.
The duration of treatment can range from one day to several weeks.
For the primary endpoint as well as the secondary clinical and other exploratory endpoints, the 3 groups will be compared in terms of DR, QoL, toxicities and treatment plan parameters
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
Decisional regret and quality of life are quantified and analyzed using general linear models (e.g.
linear regression models, ANOVA), taking into account covariates such as tumor stage, application of further systemic therapies, extent of the radiation area, occurrence of acute and/or late side effects.
Survival time analyses and tumor control rates are evaluated using Kaplan- Meyer and Cox regression.
Technical endpoints, quality of life and patient satisfaction will be described descriptively and compared between the cohorts using a mixed linear model.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
165
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Cohort 1: Patients with low-risk cancers Cohort 2: Patients with cancers in the intermediate and high risk profile Cohort 3: Patients with high symptom burden
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Indication for radiotherapy
- Patient information and declaration of consent
- Patients age ≥ 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous radiotherapy in affected site or same localisation in group 1-3
- Inability to answer the questionnaires
- Pre-existing conditions with increased risk of acute or late toxicity (LiFraumeni, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis)
- Simultaneous participation in other studies that could interfere with this study and/or participation before expiry of a required restriction period
- Persons who are in a dependent/employment relationship with the investigator
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Decisional Regret
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of routinely performed clinical follow-up examinations after 5 yeasr after RT start
|
Decisional Regret (DR) is measured by the German version of the Ottawa Decisional Regret Scale (Rühle et al. 2014) by answering the comprising 5 questions.
Responses are provided on a five-point Likert scale.
Decision regret is categorized as absent (0 points), mild (1-25 points) and strong (>25 points).
|
from enrollment to the end of routinely performed clinical follow-up examinations after 5 yeasr after RT start
|
|
Quality of Life after Radiotherapy
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of routinely performed clinical follow-up examinations after 5 yeasr after RT start
|
Quality of Life is measured using the 80 question comprising PRO-CTCAE questionnaire version 1.0 (Hagelstein et al 2016) , the 30 question comprising EORTC QLQC30 questionnaire version 3.0 and the PSQ-18 questionnaire (Thayaparan and Mahdi 2013).
All questionnaires have been previously validated in other publications.
|
from enrollment to the end of routinely performed clinical follow-up examinations after 5 yeasr after RT start
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
July 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2032
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 3, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
April 10, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 10, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 3, 2025
Last Verified
April 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 11/3/25
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Decision Making ,Shared
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRecruitingDecision Making, SharedFrance
-
University of Colorado, DenverAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)Completed
-
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho HospitalChi Mei Medical HospitalCompletedDecision Making, SharedTaiwan
-
Shalvata Mental Health CenterUnknownShared Decision Making With PatientsIsrael
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonMedical College of Wisconsin; Wisconsin Partnership ProgramEnrolling by invitationCommunication | Surgery | Shared Decision MakingUnited States
-
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health...RecruitingShared Decision Making | Vaginal Birth After CesareanTaiwan
-
Klinik ValensCompletedShared Decision MakingSwitzerland
-
Glyn Jones-ElwynDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Charles H. Hood Foundation; Cayuga County... and other collaboratorsCompletedChildren | Psychotropic Drugs | Shared Decision Making | Patient Decision Aid | Psychiatric DrugsUnited States
-
South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation TrustNot yet recruitingBariatric Surgery Candidate | Informed Consent | Shared Decision Making
-
Technical University of MunichCompletedCancer | Artificial Intelligence | Shared Decision MakingGermany