The Effect of Teaching Methods on Urinary Catheterization

April 21, 2025 updated by: Hakime Aslan, Inonu University

The Effect of Flipped Learning and Mobile Teaching Methods on Urinary Catheterization Application Knowledge, Skills and Self-Efficient Level of Nursing Students:Randomized Controlled Trial

Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of flipped learning and mobile learning methods on nursing students' urinary catheterization application knowledge, skills and self-efficacy level.

Material and Method: The study was conducted as a pretest-posttest randomized controlled experimental research model. It was conducted between June 2023 and April 2025 at Inonu University Faculty of Nursing. The population of the study consisted of all first-year students studying in the department of nursing. The sample consisted of 92 students (Group flipped learning: 30, Group mobile application: 32 and Group control: 30) determined by power analysis. "Individual introduction form", 'Urinary system applications skill evaluation form', 'Knowledge test for urinary system applications' and 'Student self-efficacy scale' were used to collect the data. During the research process, students in the experimental groups were taught with flipped learning and mobile learning methods for two weeks. Students in the control group continued the routine theoretical and practical process.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The Flipped Learning method combines online (prior knowledge acquisition) and face-to-face (learning practices) techniques to offer a learning environment in which the educator takes on a guiding role and the learners are actively engaged in learning experiences. Mobile learning method, on the other hand, provides individualised learning opportunities, enabling students to access educational materials anytime and anywhere and to gain self-managed learning skills. Since this method provides individualised learning opportunities and increases educator-learner interaction, its use in education is becoming increasingly widespread. In this study, both methods were evaluated together and their effects on the development of nursing students' competencies for urinary system practices were evaluated.

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

92

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Malatya, Turkey, 44280
        • İnönu University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being 18 or over
  • To be enrolled in the 1st year of nursing,
  • To receive training on urinary system applications for the first time,
  • To have no physical disabilities related to vision, hearing and motor skills,
  • To have a smart mobile phone with Android/IOS operating system,
  • To volunteer to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Repeating the course,
  • Not having a smart mobile phone with Android / IOS operating system,
  • Not volunteering to participate in the research.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimetal 1
Flipped learning
Course materials were shared with the students in the flipped group one week before the theoretical lesson. Google Classroom platform was used so that students could easily access these materials and repeat them at any time and frequency they wanted. A link and QR code were shared with the students to log in to the system. The frequency of downloading and watching the course materials was monitored by the researcher. Next week, the theoretical course was taught in line with the flipped learning model.
The link to the mobile application developed for mobile learning was shared with the students in this group. Students were given 2 weeks to use the application, and students had the opportunity to read and watch the content in the application at any time and frequency they wanted.
Experimental: Experimetal 2
Mobil learning
Course materials were shared with the students in the flipped group one week before the theoretical lesson. Google Classroom platform was used so that students could easily access these materials and repeat them at any time and frequency they wanted. A link and QR code were shared with the students to log in to the system. The frequency of downloading and watching the course materials was monitored by the researcher. Next week, the theoretical course was taught in line with the flipped learning model.
The link to the mobile application developed for mobile learning was shared with the students in this group. Students were given 2 weeks to use the application, and students had the opportunity to read and watch the content in the application at any time and frequency they wanted.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efeect of knowledge level
Time Frame: 2 weeks later

For the pre-test data, 'Individual Introduction Form' and 'Knowledge Test on Urinary System Practices' were given to the students and they were asked to fill them in.

At the end of 2 weeks, the 'Knowledge Test for Urinary System Practices' was applied again at the end of the 2nd week to see the change in the knowledge levels of the students who were trained with different teaching methods for 2 weeks. There were 25 questions in the knowledge test and 8 experts in the field of nursing were consulted for the questions.

2 weeks later
Effect of psychomotor skills
Time Frame: 2 weeks later

In order to evaluate the psychomotor skill level of the students in the groups, the researcher and the independent observer evaluated the urinary system application skills of each student individually and filled out the 'Urinary System Applications Skill Evaluation Form'. The skill evaluation process of each student lasted 10-15 minutes.

Skill checklists were developed to evaluate the skill performance of students on urinary system applications. Skill checklists are step-by-step checklists showing the skills expected to be performed by students and were prepared by reviewing the relevant current literature.

2 weeks later
Effect of Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 2 weeks later
The validity-reliability analysis of the scale developed by Rowbotham and Schmitz to determine the self-efficacy levels of students on nursing students was conducted by Yurtçiçek Eren and Başgöl in 2023. Permission was obtained from the authors for the use of the scale. The scale is four-point Likert-type and has one sub-dimension. The scoring of the scale is '1' Strongly Disagree, '4' Strongly Agree. A score between 10 and 40 can be obtained from the scale, and higher scores indicate an increased sense of self-efficacy.
2 weeks later

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nursing Students

Clinical Trials on Experimental

Subscribe