Using Virtual Humans to Teach Cognitive Function Assessment to Nursing Students (VHCT-NS)

January 16, 2026 updated by: Taipei Medical University

Effectiveness of Virtual Humans in Learning Cognitive Function Assessment Among Nursing Students

Purpose of the Study This study wants to find out whether a virtual human (a computer-based simulated person) can help nursing students learn how to assess someone's thinking and memory skills.

Main Question Do nursing students learn cognitive function assessment better when they use a virtual human compared with reading printed materials?

What Participants Will Do Participants will learn how to do a cognitive function assessment for about 60 minutes, either by using a virtual human or by reading printed materials.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, Taiwan, 110
        • Recruiting
        • Taipei Medical University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yeu-Hui Chuang, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Nursing students currently enrolled in a bachelor's or post-baccalaureate nursing program.
  • Students who have not previously received instruction on the SPMSQ cognitive function assessment,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Virtual human
This group will use virtual human to learn the assessement of SPMSQ.
There are five scenarios integrated into Virtual human software.
Active Comparator: Printed material
The comparison group will use printed material to learn the assessment of SPMSQ.
The comparison group will read the printed material regarding SPMSQ assessment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Competence of cognitive function assessment
Time Frame: 60 minutes
Participants are required to conduct a cognitive function assessment on the virtual patient within a designed clinical scenario. The system assigns a score based on the completion of each item, with higher scores indicating better cognitive assessment ability.
60 minutes
Knowledge of cognitive function assessment
Time Frame: 60 minutes
A total of ten items were included. Each correct answer receives one point, while incorrect or "don't know" responses receive zero points. The total score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better knowledge of cognitive function assessment among the students.
60 minutes
Confidence scale
Time Frame: 60 minutes
The scale consists of five items, each scored from 1 to 5, with a total score ranging from 5 to 25. Higher scores indicate greater confidence in performing cognitive function assessments among the participants.
60 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Learning Material Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: 60 minutes
The questionnaire includes 10 items and is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, where "strongly disagree" = 1, "disagree" = 2, "neutral" = 3, "agree" = 4, and "strongly agree" = 5. The total score ranges from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with the learning material (either the VH-based material or the printed material).
60 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 10, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N202510056

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nursing Students

Clinical Trials on Virtual human

Subscribe