Contribution of Recreational Exercises to Balance and Muscle Strength in Osteoporosis Risk

April 30, 2026 updated by: Nur ALP, Suleyman Demirel University

Effects of Recreational Exercises (Swimming, Pilates, and Walking) on Muscle Strength and Balance in Women at Risk for Osteoporosis

This study aims to evaluate the effects of recreational exercises such as Pilates, swimming and walking on muscle strength and balance in women at risk of osteoporosis.

Study hypotheses:

H1: Pilates exercises will be more effective than walking exercises in improving muscle strength among women at risk of osteoporosis.

H2: Swimming exercises will be more effective than walking exercises in improving muscle strength among women at risk of osteoporosis.

H3: Pilates exercises will be more effective than walking exercises in improving balance among women at risk of osteoporosis.

H4: Swimming exercises will be more effective than walking exercises in improving balance among women at risk of osteoporosis.

H5: Pilates and swimming exercises will have similar effects on improving muscle strength and balance among women at risk of osteoporosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants were selected from among women who had previously been diagnosed with osteoporosis risk by a physician and who applied to the Isparta Merwellness Pilates gym for exercise.

The study is planned as a randomized controlled prospective trial. Participants were assigned to three groups using a computer-generated random number table (n=20).

Pilates Group: Mat Pilates was performed three days a week for 45 minutes. Swimming Group: Moderate-intensity swimming was performed 3 days a week for 40 minutes.

Walking Group: Brisk walking was performed 3 days a week for 45 minutes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Isparta, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Recruiting
        • Suleyman Demirel University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • HULUSİ ALP, Professor
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • ZEYNEP SENEM SÖYLEYİCİ, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • REHA BOZGÜNEY, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • NUR ALP, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • İBRAHİM KUBİLAY TÜRKAY, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Having a sedentary lifestyle (not having exercised regularly in the past 6 months),
  2. No musculoskeletal or neurological conditions that would prevent participation,
  3. Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Use of medications affecting bone metabolism (e.g., bisphosphonates, corticosteroids),
  2. History of fracture within the past 6 months,
  3. Uncontrolled cardiovascular or metabolic diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pilates Group
Pilates Group: Mat Pilates was performed three days a week for 45 minutes. The programme included a 10-minute warm-up, 30 minutes of basic Pilates exercises (hundred, roll-up, spine stretch, single leg stretch) and a 5-minute cool-down and stretching phase. The exercises were conducted by a certified Pilates instructor.

Sixty women aged 40-60 years with a T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 were randomly assigned to three groups (Pilates, Swimming, Walking; n=20). Participants exercised for 40-45 minutes three days a week for 12 weeks.All exercises in this group were conducted by a certified Pilates instructor. Pilates exercises were performed on a mat.Session Content:

Warm-Up (10 min): Breathing exercises, shoulder rotation, neck stretch, posterior pelvic tilt, and spinal mobilization exercises were performed.

Main Section (30 min):

Weeks 1-4: Basic movements - Hundred, Roll-Up, Single Leg Stretch, Spine Stretch Weeks 5-8: Intermediate variations - Double Leg Stretch, Rolling Like a Ball, Saw Weeks 9-12: Advanced balance-focused movements - Teaser Prep, Side Kick Series, Swimming, Leg Pull Front Cool-Down (5 min): Deep breathing exercises, hamstring stretching, and spinal Participation rates were regularly recorded, and individuals who participated below 80% of the program were excluded from the analysis.

Experimental: Swimming Group
Swimming Group: Moderate-intensity swimming was performed 3 days a week for 40 minutes. The exercises included a 5-minute warm-up, 30 minutes of freestyle and backstroke swimming, and a 5-minute cool-down phase. Participants' heart rates were maintained at 60- 70% of their maximum heart rate.

Participants in the swimming group completed moderate-intensity swimming exercises for 40 minutes, three days a week. The program consisted of a 5-minute warm-up, 30 minutes of freestyle and backstroke swimming, and a 5-minute cool-down. Participants' heart rates were maintained between 60 and 70% of their maximum heart rate.

Session content:

Warm-up (5 min): Light swimming, in-water mobilization exercises

Main Part (30 min):

Weeks 1-4: Freestyle swimming with 25-50 m rest intervals Weeks 5-8: Alternating freestyle and backstroke swimming with 75-100 m rest intervals.

Weeks 9-12: Continuous swimming sets (150-200 m) - technical development and endurance Cool down (5 min): Light swimming, stretching in the water Exercise intensity was monitored using the Borg Scale of Perceived Exertion (RPE). Participation rates were regularly recorded, and individuals who participated below 80% of the program were excluded from the analysis.

Experimental: Walking Group
Brisk walking was performed 3 days a week for 45 minutes. The programme consisted of a 5-minute warm-up walk, 35 minutes of walking at 60-70% of maximum heart rate, and a 5-minute cool-down walk.

Individuals in this group participated in brisk walking at 60-70% of their maximum heart rate for 45 minutes, three days a week. The program consisted of a 5-minute warm-up walk, a 35-minute brisk walk, and a 5-minute cool-down walk. A 45-minute walking program was designed three days a week (Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday).

Terrace: Flat, safe walking track Intensity: 60-70% of maximum heart rate

Session Contents:

Warm-Up (5 min): Light walking, shoulder and hip mobilization

Main Part (35 min):

Weeks 1-4: 5-6 km/h brisk walking Weeks 5-8: 6-6.5 km/h brisk walking Weeks 9-12: 6.5-7 km/h brisk walking Cool-Down (5 min): Slow walking, calf, hamstring, and lower back stretching exercises.Exercise intensity was monitored in all groups using the Borg Scale of Perceived Exertion (RPE). Participation rates were regularly recorded, and individuals who participated below 80% of the program were excluded from the analysis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Handgrip strength
Time Frame: At baseline and at the end of the 12-week intervention
Handgrip strength was measured using a digital hand dynamometer (Jamar Plus+, kg). Three repetitions were taken during the measurements, and the highest value was recorded. The Jamar dynamometer has high reliability in individuals with osteoporosis (ICC = 0.95).
At baseline and at the end of the 12-week intervention
Trunk flexor and extensor strength
Time Frame: At baseline and at the end of the 12-week intervention
Trunk flexor and extensor strength were assessed using isokinetic dynamometry (Biodex System 4) at a speed of 60°/s. This method has been reported as a valid measurement tool for elderly individuals and those at risk of osteoporosis.
At baseline and at the end of the 12-week intervention
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: At baseline and at the end of the 12-week intervention
Berg Balance Scale (BBS): A 14-item test scored between 0 and 56. The reliability coefficient in the Turkish adaptation was found to be 0.98.
At baseline and at the end of the 12-week intervention
Computerised posturography:
Time Frame: At baseline and at the end of the 12-week intervention
Computerised posturography: Static and dynamic balance were assessed, and centre of pressure (CoP) oscillation (mm) was recorded. Posturography is a widely used objective method in the osteoporotic population.
At baseline and at the end of the 12-week intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: HULUSİ ALP, Professor, Suleyman Demirel University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data for objectives of the research will be compared after they are received.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis (Senile)

Clinical Trials on Experimental Group 1

Subscribe