Double Kissing-crush vs Controlled Balloon-crush Techniques For Complex Coronary Bfurcation Lesions

April 15, 2025 updated by: Ahmet Guner, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Educational and Training Hospital

Comparison of Cardiovascular Outcomes of Double Kissing-crush vs Controlled Balloon-crush Techniques For Complex Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

The Crush technique for coronary bifurcation lesions has evolved significantly since its introduction to the literature by Colombo et al. in 2003, with several iterations, including double kissing balloon inflation. The main disadvantage of the historical Crush technique is the low success rate of the final kissing balloon inflation. An improvement came with the introduction of double kissing crush stenting aiming for the shorter protrusion and kissing balloon dilation performed before and after main branch stent implantation. The double kissing crush provides a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events compared to Provisional stenting, Crush, and Culotte techniques. Recently, a novel modified mini-crush technique (controlled balloon-crush) has been introduced to the literature and is one of the most up-to-date crush techniques. The main advantage of this technique over the contemporary mini-crush technique is that the side branch can be easily rewired, and the 1:1 size non-compliant balloon can easily pass through the crushed stent structure in the ostial part of the side branch. The basic rationale of this is that the crushing of the side branch stent is done in a more controlled manner (by slowly deflation of the side branch stent balloon), and this causes less disruption of the stent cells. To date, no data compares the mid-term outcomes of double kissing crush and controlled balloon-crush stenting techniques in patients with complex coronary bifurcation lesions. Hence, this study aimed to determine the clinical results of double kissing crush and controlled balloon-crush techniques under mid-term follow-up.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Abdullah Doğan, MD

Study Locations

      • İstanbul, Turkey, 33484
        • Recruiting
        • Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Complex coronary bifurcation disease

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged >18
  • PCI with either DK-crush or Controlled balloon-crush
  • Complex coronary bifurcation lesion (Medina 0.1.1, Medina 1.1.1)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-complex bifurcation anatomy
  • Bail-out 2-stent (reverse modified mini-crush)
  • ST-elevation myocardial infarction
  • Cardiogenic shock status
  • In-stent restenosis
  • A previous of coronary artery bypass grafting
  • Implantation of bare-metal stent
  • End-stage hepatic or renal disease
  • <1-year life expectancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Controlled balloon-crush Group
Double kissing-crush stenting Group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary endpoint (Target lesion failure)
Time Frame: 36 months
Target lesion failure (%) is defined as the combination of cardiac death (%), target vessel myocardial infarction (%), or target lesion revascularization (%) rates.
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025.03-21

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bifurcation Coronary Disease

Subscribe