Distraction as Treatment for Pain in Children in Resource-scarce Settings (DISTRACT)

April 16, 2025 updated by: Måns Muhrbeck MD, PhD, Vrinnevi Hospital

Pain alleviation in pediatric patients can be challenging for medical professionals working in resource scarce settings due to limited availability of medication, monitoring equipment, or training in this field of expertise. This poses the need for a readily available tool for pain reduction that does not rely on expensive equipment or medication and which can easily be applied in resource scarce settings around the world. With this research project we aim to assess the effectiveness of a simple, inexpensive, non-electronic distraction method: a kaleidoscope, to reduce acute pain in pediatric patients undergoing dressing changes in resource scarce environments.

A randomized controlled trial will be performed at the Edendale Hospital in Pietermaritzburg KwaZulu Natal, South Africa. Pediatric patients between the age of 7-12 years with partial thickness burn injuries who require dressing changes in the outpatient clinic will be randomized into two groups: one group (control) will receive standard practice of care which concerns a dressing change without any pain alleviation other than paracetamol or a non-steroidal anti inflammatory drug (NSAID), and one group (intervention) will receive distraction by use of a kaleidoscope as method for potential pain alleviation on top of standard medical care. The primary outcome will be the difference in mean change in pain score (from before to during the dressing change) between the control and distraction group.

This study is expected to demonstrate that the use of a non-electronic distraction technique effectively alleviates pain in children undergoing dressing changes and that its use is feasible in low resource settings. The distraction technique can be applied as add-on to pharmacological treatment, or stand-alone when no pharmacological treatment is available. Distraction is expected to be safe and can even be applied by an accompanying parent, resulting in lower barriers for healthcare workers to apply it. Appropriate pain relief will improve psychological wellbeing of pediatric patients undergoing painful procedures, and it might even improve recovery and physical rehabilitation since pain has been associated with physical as well as mental morbidity.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

126

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Måns Muhrbeck Senior surgical consultant, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 46-703338852
  • Email: mans.muhrbeck@liu.se

Study Locations

    • Kwazulu Natal
      • Empangeni, Kwazulu Natal, South Africa, 3880
        • Recruiting
        • Ngwelezana Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Ravi Naidoo, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients between the age of 7 and 12 years old with burn injuries requiring dressing changes in the outpatient clinic, who in regular practice (non-research setting) would not receive any analgesics;
  • Type of burn injury: partial thickness burns with a burned area not greater than 10% at the moment of the first dressing change measurement as part of this research

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who received split skin grafts for their burns;
  • Patients on sedatives or anti-epileptics;
  • The use of pain-relieving medication other than paracetamol or ibuprofen;
  • Painful additional injuries other than the burn injury;
  • Patients who are nursed in isolation;
  • Physical or mental impairments which make it impossible to adequately comply with the trial protocol. For example, visual impairments, impaired ability to communicate, psychological comorbidities, and burns that limit the use of a kaleidoscope (facial burns or burns to both hands);
  • Retrospective exclusion if the patient in the intervention group did not look through the kaleidoscope for more than 50% of the procedure time.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Undergoing dressing change with standard medical care. Standard medical care can include: no pain alleviation methods; paracetamol; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; combination of paracetamol with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
Experimental: Distraction
Undergoing dressing change with standard medical care (as described above for Control arm), combined with distraction by use of a kaleidoscope as a possible pain alleviation method.
During the intervention measurement, the pediatric patient will be distracted by the use of a kaleidoscope during the procedure. Distraction by use of the kaleidoscope will be initiated at the start of the procedure (dressing change) and the kaleidoscope will be offered until at least a minute after the procedure is completed. Removal of the dressing will be started when the child seems distracted as indicated by response with a smile or laughter, or a verbal response

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain score
Time Frame: Pain scores measured five minutes prior to dressing change; pain score during dressing change, measured immediately after removal of the dressing
The change (increase) in pain scores (the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale and the FLACC scale), 0 (less pain)-10 (more pain) , from prior to the dressing change to during the dressing change
Pain scores measured five minutes prior to dressing change; pain score during dressing change, measured immediately after removal of the dressing

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postprocedural pain score decrease
Time Frame: Pain scores during dressing change, after removal of the dressing; pain score at five minutes after dressing change
Change in mean pain scores (the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale and the FLACC scale), 0 (less pain)-10 (more pain) , when comparing scores during with scores after the procedure.
Pain scores during dressing change, after removal of the dressing; pain score at five minutes after dressing change
Heart rate
Time Frame: Measured five minutes before dressing change; measured during dressing change at two-minute interval; measured five minutes after dressing change
Change/course of heart rate before, during and after dressing change
Measured five minutes before dressing change; measured during dressing change at two-minute interval; measured five minutes after dressing change
Oxygen saturation
Time Frame: Measured five minutes before dressing change; measured during dressing change at two-minute interval; measured five minutes after dressing change
Change/course of blood oxygen levels before, during and after dressing change
Measured five minutes before dressing change; measured during dressing change at two-minute interval; measured five minutes after dressing change
Global satisfaction
Time Frame: Five minutes after dressing change
Global judgement of satisfaction with treatment by caregiver and medical professional, will be measured on a 1 (very dissatisfied)-5 (very satisfied) scale based on the question: "Considering pain relief, side effects, and emotional status, how satisfied were you with the dressing change the child underwent?"
Five minutes after dressing change
Procedure time
Time Frame: Duration of dressing change
Procedure time (seconds), reflecting procedure efficiency/patient cooperation
Duration of dressing change

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DISTRACT-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Acute

Clinical Trials on Distraction with kaleidoscope

Subscribe