Effect of YAP1-inhibition in Surgical Wounds.

April 17, 2025 updated by: Jöri Pünchera

The Role of YAP1 in Fibrosis Explored Through Its Local Inhibition With Verteporfin in Surgical Wounds: A Randomized Controlled, Prospective, Evaluator-blinded Proof-of-concept Study.

When we get injured, our body naturally tries to heal. In adults, this healing often leads to scars - thick, stiff tissue known as fibrotic tissue. Unlike normal tissue, fibrotic tissue doesn't function properly and can cause serious health problems, depending on the affected organ. Once it forms, fibrosis is usually permanent.

A good example of the fibrosis process is the healing of our skin: after a cut or surgery, the resulting scar is a type of fibrosis. Special cells called fibroblasts are key players in this process.

Our study looks at a drug called verteporfin, which is already approved both in Europe and the U.S. Previous research on mice and human cells suggests it can reduce or even prevent fibrosis.

We are now testing, clinically, histologically and by scRNA-seq, whether injecting verteporfin into the skin during wound healing, specifically after surgical procedures, can prevent thick, rigid scars from forming. Since the skin is easy to observe and sample, it offers a great model for studying this.

Will verteporfin have an impact on how surgical wounds heal? That's what we aim to find out.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

24

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Jöri Pünchera, M.D.
  • Phone Number: +41223729450
  • Email: jpuc@hug.ch

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Michael Mühlstädt, M.D.
  • Phone Number: +41223729450
  • Email: mmuh@hug.ch

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing and able to provide informed consent as documented by signature
  • Age is >/= 18 years and < 56 years (differently said: starting from the 18th birthday to completion of their 55 years)
  • Indication for a safety margin excision (5 mm laterally) due to melanoma in situ or severe dysplastic nevi previously completely excised
  • Length of initial scar from 15 mm to 50 mm
  • The initial lesion was excised on the back (to ensure that all patients undergo their safety margin excision within the internationally accepted timeframe, we will also accept patients requiring the procedure at another anatomical site if a particular batch cannot be filled within 4 weeks of its first patient's enrollment)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical adenopathy (cervical, axillar, inguinal) defined as a lymph node of more than 1 cm diameter
  • Melanoma in situ of lentigo maligna or acral lentiginous type
  • Head and neck location
  • Diameter of initial lesion above or equal to 3 cm
  • Known and documented hypersensitivity to Verteporfin or to any of its excipients: lactose monohydrate, egg phosphatidylglycerol (to simplify we will exclude patients with known and documented allergy to egg protein), dimyristoyl phosphatidylcholine, ascorbyl palmitate, butylated hydroxytoluene (E321)
  • Porphyria
  • Moderate hepatic dysfunction referred to as any of the following: AST >1.2x upper normal range, ALT >1.2x upper normal range, decreased albumin level, prolongation of PT
  • Biliary obstruction referred to as any of the following: ALP >1.2x upper normal range, GGT >1.2x upper normal range, anormal bilirubin level
  • Pregnancy referred to as: positive beta-hCG blood test
  • Breast-feeding
  • Planned pregnancy in the next 6 months
  • History of either one of the following: keloids, scleroderma, morphea, lupus erythematosus, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, graft-versus-host disease, lichen sclerosus, eosinophilic fasciitis, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, cutis laxa, Marfan syndrome, or pseudoxanthoma elasticum

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo arm
During the safety margin excision, the placebo (NaCl) will be injected into the wound before suturing.
Experimental: Study arm (verteporfin)
During the safety margin excision, the study drug (Verteporfin) will be injected into the wound before suturing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantification of the profibrotic mesenchymal fibroblast subpopulation in the study group compared to the placebo group.
Time Frame: There are 90 +/- 10 days between visit 1 and visit 4.
For comparison between groups, skin samples of the repaired tissue taken at visit 4 (Day 90 +/- 10) will be compared between the patients of both groups.
There are 90 +/- 10 days between visit 1 and visit 4.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The changes of fibroblast subpopulations, clusters, and their different cell-cell interactions in both groups before and after the study intervention.
Time Frame: There are 90 +/- 10 days between visit 1 and visit 4.
For comparison over time in both groups, skin samples of the repaired tissue taken at visit 4 (Day 90 +/- 10) will be compared to the scar sample of visit 1 (Day 0) in all patients of both groups.
There are 90 +/- 10 days between visit 1 and visit 4.
Quantification of pilosebaceous units and profibrotic activity (quantity of collagen I and III and its ratio, fibronectin, α-SMA, nuclear localization of YAP1 and En1-staining) and its change over time
Time Frame: There are 90 +/- 10 days between visit 1 and visit 4.
For comparison over time in both groups, skin samples of the repaired tissue taken at visit 4 (Day 90 +/- 10) will be compared to the scar sample of visit 1 (Day 0) in all patients of both groups.
There are 90 +/- 10 days between visit 1 and visit 4.
Quantification of the different fibroblast subpopulations in unwounded, healthy skin.
Time Frame: The initial excision will take place 21 to 54 days before V1.
In all patients, 2 slices of the initial FFPE skin samples will be analyzed.
The initial excision will take place 21 to 54 days before V1.
The changes of different fibroblast subpopulations passing from unwounded skin to scarred, to repaired skin.
Time Frame: There are a maximum of 56 days + 90 +/- 10 days between the inital mole removal and visit 4.
Analysis of the initial FFPE skin samples compared to the analysis on Day 0 and Day 90 (+/- 10).
There are a maximum of 56 days + 90 +/- 10 days between the inital mole removal and visit 4.
Comparison of the clinical outcomes of the scars in both groups.
Time Frame: There are a minimum of 154 and a maximum of 178 days between visit 3 and visit 5.
The clinical outcomes will be evaluated by VSS scoring at visit 3 (Day 14 +/- 2), visit 4 (Day 90 +/- 10) and visit 5 (Day 180 +/- 10).
There are a minimum of 154 and a maximum of 178 days between visit 3 and visit 5.
The comparison of PROMs
Time Frame: There are a minimum of 154 and a maximum of 178 days between visit 3 and visit 5.
PROMs will be assessed in both groups by SCAR-Q scoring at Day 14 (+/- 2), Day 90 (+/- 10) and Day 180 (+/- 10).
There are a minimum of 154 and a maximum of 178 days between visit 3 and visit 5.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jöri Pünchera, M.D., University Hospital, Geneva

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 8, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CCER_Etude 2024- 00419

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) underlying the assessment of primary and secondary outcomes, will be shared in a coded, anonymized format via a secure repository in accordance with FAIR data principles and Open Research Data guidelines. Data will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request following publication. Access may be subject to a data use agreement.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Scar Formation

Clinical Trials on Verteporfin Injection

Subscribe