- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06949488
Efficacy of Different Medications as Adjuvants in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Forearm Surgeries
April 22, 2025 updated by: Mohammed Gaber Saad, Al-Azhar University
Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine, Dexamethasone, and Magnesium Sulphate as Adjuvants in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Forearm Surgeries - A Randomized Clinical Trial
This study is to evaluate whether addition of dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to bupivacaine in supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blockade (BPB) for pain management assessed by VAS score.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
This is a randomized controlled study involving 105 participants divided into three groups to assess the efficacy of adding dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade during upper limb surgeries.
The primary outcome is the postoperative Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score.
The secondary outcomes are assessment of onset and duration of the block, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
105
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 11884
- Faculity of medicine - Al-Azhar University hospitals
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status of I and II
- undergoing forearm surgeries
Exclusion Criteria:
- coagulopathies
- Local skin lesions
- Pregnancy
- Has a history of significant neurological, psychiatric, or neuromuscular disorders
- Patients refusing participation
- BMI > 40
- Patient with COPD. hypersensitivity or allergies to local anesthesia
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group A (DT): Dexmedetomidine group
A group of 35 participants will receive 18 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% plus dexmedetomidine 100 µg for the supraclavicular block.
|
The ultrasound probe is placed in the supraclavicular fossa in the transverse orientation parallel to the clavicle and aimed inferior toward the ipsilateral thorax.
The brachial plexus and the subclavian artery are visualized.
The first rib appears as a hyperechoic line with the lung pleura deeper to this bony border.
Utilizing the in-plane approach, the needle is advanced from lateral to medial, aimed near the main neural cluster of the brachial plexus.
After negative aspiration, local anesthetic, including 100 µg Dexmeditomidine and normal saline, with a total volume of 20 mL, is injected.
Subsequently, smaller aliquots of local anesthetic are deposited near the surrounding satellite neural clusters.
|
|
Experimental: Group B (MG): Magnesium group
A group of 35 participants will receive 18 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% plus magnesium sulfate 150 mg in 2 ml of normal saline for the same block.
|
The ultrasound probe is placed in the supraclavicular fossa in the transverse orientation parallel to the clavicle and aimed inferior toward the ipsilateral thorax.
The brachial plexus and the subclavian artery are visualized.
The first rib appears as a hyperechoic line with the lung pleura deeper to this bony border.
Utilizing the in-plane approach, the needle is advanced from lateral to medial, aimed near the main neural cluster of the brachial plexus.
After negative aspiration, local anesthetic, including 150 mg of magnesium sulfate and normal saline, with a total volume of 20 mL, is injected.
Subsequently, smaller aliquots of local anesthetic are deposited near the surrounding satellite neural clusters.
|
|
Active Comparator: Group C (DM): Dexamethasone group
A group of 35 participants will receive 18 ml of bupivacaine 0.5% plus dexamethasone 8 mg for the same block.
|
The ultrasound probe is placed in the supraclavicular fossa in the transverse orientation parallel to the clavicle and aimed inferior toward the ipsilateral thorax.
The brachial plexus and the subclavian artery are visualized.
The first rib appears as a hyperechoic line with the lung pleura deeper to this bony border.
Utilizing the in-plane approach, the needle is advanced from lateral to medial, aimed near the main neural cluster of the brachial plexus.
After negative aspiration, local anesthetic, including 8 mg dexamethasone and normal saline, with a total volume of 20 mL, is injected.
Subsequently, smaller aliquots of local anesthetic are deposited near the surrounding satellite neural clusters.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
-Post operative Visual analogue scale VAS score
Time Frame: Over 24 hours post operative starting from transeferring the patient to the recovery area.
|
Assess post-operative VAS score at: T0 (after transferring to the recovery area), at T1: at two hours, T3: at four hours, T4: at six hours, T5: at eight hours, T6: at 10 hours, T7: at 12 hours, T8: at 16 hours, T9: at 20 hours, and T10 at 24 hours postoperatively.
|
Over 24 hours post operative starting from transeferring the patient to the recovery area.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Onst of sensory block
Time Frame: Complete sensory block will be assessed every 5 min up to a maximum of 30 minutes
|
Time in minutes from completing the block to complete sensory loss to sensation of a cold cotton pad relative to the contralateral limb.
|
Complete sensory block will be assessed every 5 min up to a maximum of 30 minutes
|
|
Onset of motor block
Time Frame: Complete motor block will be assessed every 5 min up to a maximum of 30 minutes
|
Time in minutes from completing the block up to the time when the patient is unable to overcome gravity relative to the contralateral arm.
|
Complete motor block will be assessed every 5 min up to a maximum of 30 minutes
|
|
Duration of the sensory block
Time Frame: Sensation will be assessed every 4 hours till return of normal sensation up to maximum 24 hours .
|
Complete return of the sensation in the blocked limb relative to the contralateral arm.
|
Sensation will be assessed every 4 hours till return of normal sensation up to maximum 24 hours .
|
|
duration of the motor block
Time Frame: Motor power will be assessed every 4 hours till return of normal sensation up to maximum 24 hourswill be assessed every 4 hours till return of normal sensation up to maximum 24 hours
|
Complete return of the motor power in the blocked limb
|
Motor power will be assessed every 4 hours till return of normal sensation up to maximum 24 hourswill be assessed every 4 hours till return of normal sensation up to maximum 24 hours
|
|
Intraoperative mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: From positioning the patient to the block upto 90 minutes from removing the needle
|
Mean arterial blood pressure in mmHg will be assessed at T0: baseline before patient positing for the block, at T1: just after removing the needle, at T2: at 30 minutes, T3: at 60 Minutes , and T4: at 90 minutes intraoperatively
|
From positioning the patient to the block upto 90 minutes from removing the needle
|
|
Intraoperative Pulse rate.
Time Frame: From positioning the patient to the block upto 90 minutes from removing the needle
|
pulse rate per minute will be assessed at T0: baseline before patient positing for the block, at T1: just after removing the needle, at T2: at 30 minutes, T3: at 60 Minutes, and T4: at 90 minutes intraoperatively
|
From positioning the patient to the block upto 90 minutes from removing the needle
|
|
Post operative opioid consumption
Time Frame: Over 24 hours post operatively started form transferring the patient to the recovery area
|
Postoperative total doses of pethidine in milligrams will be counted.
For patients with a VAS score of more than 4, pethidine 50mg will be given intramuscularly.
|
Over 24 hours post operatively started form transferring the patient to the recovery area
|
|
Post operative Nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: Over 24 hours post operative starting from transferring to the recovery area.
|
Nausea and vomiting attacks will be recorded over 24 hours postoperatively.
|
Over 24 hours post operative starting from transferring to the recovery area.
|
|
Postoperative transient neurologic symptoms
Time Frame: Over 48 hours post operative starting from transeferring to the recovery area.
|
Dysesthesia will be assessed every 12 hours postoperatively and reported
|
Over 48 hours post operative starting from transeferring to the recovery area.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Hend Mostafa Abosaifa, MD, Al-Azhar University
- Principal Investigator: Fatma Alzahraa Roshdy Elkemary, MD, Al-Azhar Unversity
- Study Chair: Noha Mohamed Elsai, MD, Al-Azhar Unversity
- Principal Investigator: Ain ELmarwa Abdelmonem Abdallah, MD, Al-Azhar Unversity
- Study Chair: Nashwa Mohammed Ibrahiem, MD, Al-Azhar Unversity
- Study Chair: Wafaa Abd Ali Elhadi, MD, Al-Azhar Unversity
- Principal Investigator: Hanaa Said Rashed, MD, National liver institute Menofia University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Begon S, Pickering G, Eschalier A, Dubray C. Magnesium increases morphine analgesic effect in different experimental models of pain. Anesthesiology. 2002 Mar;96(3):627-32. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200203000-00019.
- Bruce BG, Green A, Blaine TA, Wesner LV. Brachial plexus blocks for upper extremity orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012 Jan;20(1):38-47. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-20-01-038.
- Kara H, Sahin N, Ulusan V, Aydogdu T. Magnesium infusion reduces perioperative pain. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Jan;19(1):52-6. doi: 10.1017/s026502150200008x.
- Herman J, Urits I, Eskander J, Kaye AD, Viswanath O. Correction: Adductor Canal Block Duration of Analgesia Successfully Prolonged With Perineural Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone in Addition to IPACK Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Cureus. 2020 Nov 16;12(11):c39. doi: 10.7759/cureus.c39.
- Zoratto D, Phelan R, Hopman WM, Wood GCA, Shyam V, DuMerton D, Shelley J, McQuaide S, Kanee L, Ho AM, McMullen M, Armstrong M, Mizubuti GB. Adductor canal block with or without added magnesium sulfate following total knee arthroplasty: a multi-arm randomized controlled trial. Can J Anaesth. 2021 Jul;68(7):1028-1037. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-01985-5. Epub 2021 May 26.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 30, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 22, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
April 29, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 29, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 22, 2025
Last Verified
April 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Antiemetics
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Gastrointestinal Agents
- Glucocorticoids
- Hormones
- Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
- Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
- Analgesics
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists
- Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
- Adrenergic Agonists
- Adrenergic Agents
- Dexamethasone
- Dexmedetomidine
Other Study ID Numbers
- RHDIRB2018122002
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Upper Limb Surgery
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedUpper Limb Surgery | Hand SurgeryEgypt
-
Northern Jiangsu People's HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompleted
-
Arsi UniversityCompletedUpper Limb Surgery | Dexamethasone | BupivacaineEthiopia
-
Alzahraa Ahmed AbbasCompletedUpper Limb Surgery | Regional Anesthesia BlockEgypt
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreWithdrawnUpper Limb Surgery | Occupational TherapyUnited States
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedSurgery to the Distal One Third of the Upper LimbEgypt
-
Orthocare Innovations, LLCNational Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation...RecruitingStroke | Upper Limb Amputation | Upper Limb Weakness Due to Central Neurologic Injury | Upper Limb Weakness Due to Peripheral Neurologic Injury | Upper Limb Weakness Due to Nerve Reconstruction | Upper Limb Weakness Due to Tendon Transfer SurgeryUnited States
-
Ibadat International University, IslamabadRecruitingUpper Limb Strength | Upper Limb Power | Upper Limb Serve VelocityPakistan
-
Montefiore Medical CenterTuMeke ErgonomicsCompletedSurgery | Educational Problems | Work-related Injury | Work Related Upper Limb DisorderUnited States
Clinical Trials on Group A (DT): Dexmedetomidine group
-
Al-Azhar UniversityBenha UniversityNot yet recruitingPost-Spinal ShiveringEgypt
-
Al-Azhar UniversityBenha UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentCompletedFrailty | Colonoscopy | Sedation | Cognition | Geriatric AnesthesiaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Sun FeiZhongda HospitalRecruiting
-
Alexandria UniversityRecruitingIntravenous Lidocaine Infusion Versus Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Infusion During Sleeve GastrectomyDexmedetomidine | Bariatric Surgery | LidocaineEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Not yet recruiting
-
Emad Eldin MohamedOctober 6 UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Kafrelsheikh UniversityActive, not recruitingPulmonary Dysfunction | Spastic DiaplegiaEgypt
-
Prince Sultan Military Medical CityCompleted