Comparison of Multiple Percutaneous Needle Aspiration Versus Incision and Drainage in Small Breast Abscesses: Pain, Cosmesis, and Early Breastfeeding Outcomes

April 26, 2025 updated by: Aroona Arif, Quaid-e-Azam Medical College

Comparison of Pain, Cosmesis and Early Restoration of Breast Feeding in Multiple Percutaneous Needle Aspiration Vs Incision and Drainage for Small Breast Abscess Management

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of multiple percutaneous needle aspiration (MPNA) versus incision and drainage (ID) for the management of small breast abscesses in breastfeeding women. The trial evaluates three key outcomes: post-procedure pain levels, cosmetic satisfaction, and the timing of breastfeeding restoration. The study is conducted at the Department of Surgery, Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur, enrolling 110 lactating women aged 18-45 years with abscesses ≤5 cm in diameter. Participants were treated with either MPNA or ID based on clinical decision and patient preference. Pain levels were assessed using a standardized scale, cosmetic outcomes were evaluated via patient-reported satisfaction, and breastfeeding restoration was monitored at baseline, one week, and one month post-treatment. Findings indicate that MPNA is associated with lower pain scores, better cosmetic satisfaction, and faster resumption of breastfeeding compared to ID, suggesting MPNA as a preferred first-line treatment for small breast abscesses.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan, 63100
        • Bahawal Victoria Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Married breastfeeding women Age: 18-45 years Diagnosed with breast abscess (≤5 cm in diameter)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Complicated abscesses Compromised immune system History of prior surgical interventions for breast abscess Unwilling to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multiple Percutaneous Needle Aspiration (MPNA) Group
Participants in this group underwent multiple percutaneous needle aspiration for the treatment of small breast abscesses
A minimally invasive technique involving repeated needle aspiration of breast abscess fluid without making an incision.
A surgical procedure involving an incision in the abscess to allow drainage of pus, followed by wound care.
Active Comparator: Incision and Drainage (ID) Group
Participants in this group underwent incision and drainage for the treatment of small breast abscesses.
A minimally invasive technique involving repeated needle aspiration of breast abscess fluid without making an incision.
A surgical procedure involving an incision in the abscess to allow drainage of pus, followed by wound care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Score
Time Frame: 1 week post-procedure
Assessment of pain using a standardized visual analog scale (VAS) at 1 week after the procedure.
1 week post-procedure
Breastfeeding Restoration
Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure
Proportion of patients resuming breastfeeding at 1 month after intervention, determined by patient self-report.
1 month post-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cosmetic Satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 month post-procedure
Patient-reported satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes, assessed through a survey at 1 month after intervention.
1 month post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 9, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 8, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 8, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • No. PG656/DME/QAMC/BWP

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Abscess

Clinical Trials on Multiple Percutaneous Needle Aspiration (MPNA)

Subscribe