Implementation of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation After Total Knee Arthroplasty

September 25, 2025 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver
Patients experience dramatic quadriceps strength loss after total knee replacement, which contributes to persistent weakness and reduced long-term function after surgery. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) reduces quadriceps weakness and improves patient function after knee replacement, but it is drastically underused in rehabilitation practice. This randomized trial will examine the effectiveness and feasibility of a comprehensive strategy for implementing neuromuscular electrical stimulation after knee replacement in two large healthcare organizations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) reduces pain and disability caused by knee osteoarthritis, but the surgery results in substantial trauma to the knee. This acute trauma exacerbates underlying weakness-especially in the quadriceps. This leads to muscle atrophy and likely contributes to the long-term weakness and disability patients with TKA experience relative to their healthy peers. Attenuating quadriceps strength loss should be a primary target for improving rehabilitation outcomes after TKA.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is recommended in TKA clinical practice guidelines to attenuate quadriceps strength loss. In controlled settings, NMES has established efficacy and attenuates quadriceps strength loss by 40% in the first month after surgery by overriding muscle activation deficits and reducing muscle atrophy. However, the effectiveness of NMES after TKA has not been adequately studied in real-world clinical settings, and preliminary data suggests that less than 4% of rehabilitation clinicians are using NMES as recommended by current TKA practice guidelines.

To address this gap, the investigators will conduct a cluster randomized trial in two healthcare systems (UCHealth and Intermountain Health) and their associated outpatient physical therapy clinics (n=30) to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of NMES to address musculoskeletal deficits after TKA.

The investigators will compare outcomes between patients who receive contemporary rehabilitation supported by a comprehensive NMES implementation strategy (NMES) to patients who receive contemporary musculoskeletal rehabilitation alone (Usual Care; Aim 1). The investigators will gather information on NMES implementation to promote its uptake and translation to clinical practice (Aim 2).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

3250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Recruiting
        • UCHealth
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael Bade, PT, PhD
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Recruiting
        • University of Colorado Denver, Anschutz
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley, PT, PhD
    • Utah
      • Murray, Utah, United States, 84107
        • Recruiting
        • Intermountain Health
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kate Minick, DPT, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Site Inclusion Criteria:

• UCHealth or Intermountain Health outpatient physical therapy clinic

Patient Inclusion Criteria:

  • Underwent primary unilateral TKA
  • Attended outpatient rehabilitation at a participating clinic within 5 days after TKA
  • Attended at least 3 total outpatient physical therapy visits in total

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient Exclusion Criteria:

  • NMES Contraindications [Patients with implanted cardiovascular cardiovertedefibrillator (ICD), active cancer, post-operative diagnosed deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in involved lower extremity]
  • Previous lower extremity arthroplasty less than 12 weeks prior to scheduled TKA surgical date

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NMES
Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) consists of usual care rehabilitation plus evidence-based implementation of NMES in the early postoperative period to improve physical function after TKA.
The NMES intervention protocol in this study ensures patients receive NMES intervention that is adequately dosed (dose = treatment minutes x intensity), delivered using evidence-based parameters, and feasible. The investigators will deliver NMES using a portable two-channel stimulator that the investigators have found to produce stronger muscle contractions than other portable NMES units and has been used in previous clinical studies. It also has a built-in compliance meter to monitor patient treatment minutes (adherence) to NMES application. NMES sites will perform routine collection of outcomes as part of standard practice.
Active Comparator: Usual Care
The Usual Care clinics will continue clinical practice as normal. Usual Care sites will not have overlap of personnel or training with NMES Sites.
Usual Care clinics will continue with routine collection and documentation of physical performance outcomes as standard practice. A combination of chart reviews and on-site or remote observation will allow for characterization of usual care components for descriptive comparison. Usual Care clinics including the facility, rehabilitation clinicians, and patients will not have access to NMES materials developed for this study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed Up and Go (TUG)
Time Frame: Pre-operative visit; Post-operative PT baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (primary endpoint), 6 weeks, up to 24 weeks
The TUG is a measure of mobility and balance that consists of rising from a seated position, walking three meters, and pivoting and returning to the original seated position. Faster times indicate better physical function.
Pre-operative visit; Post-operative PT baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (primary endpoint), 6 weeks, up to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
30 Second Sit-to-Stand (30-STS)
Time Frame: Pre-operative visit; Post-operative PT baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (primary endpoint), 6 weeks, up to 24 weeks
The 30-STS is a measure of lower body strength and stamina that consists of moving from sitting to a full stand as many times as possible in 30 seconds. More completions indicate better physical function.
Pre-operative visit; Post-operative PT baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (primary endpoint), 6 weeks, up to 24 weeks
Quadriceps Strength
Time Frame: Pre-operative visit; Post-operative PT baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (primary endpoint), 6 weeks, up to 24 weeks
A commercially available hand dynamometer that uses a Bluetooth-enabled tensile load sensor will be used to assess quadriceps strength. Load sensors are reliable and valid for assessing isometric quadriceps strength. Higher scores indicate more strength
Pre-operative visit; Post-operative PT baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (primary endpoint), 6 weeks, up to 24 weeks
Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL)
Time Frame: Pre-operative visit; Post-operative PT baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (primary endpoint), 6 weeks, up to 24 weeks
The Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL) provides a score of patients' self-reported knee stiffness, pain, and function. Scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms affecting activities of daily living.
Pre-operative visit; Post-operative PT baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (primary endpoint), 6 weeks, up to 24 weeks
Knee Range of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame: Pre-operative visit; Post-operative PT baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (primary endpoint), 6 weeks, up to 24 weeks
ROM measures the amount of movement a joint can make in a specific direction and will be assessed using a goniometer. Higher degrees of movement indicate better range of motion.
Pre-operative visit; Post-operative PT baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (primary endpoint), 6 weeks, up to 24 weeks
Visit Utilization
Time Frame: Post-operative PT baseline up to 24 weeks
Visit utilization will be defined as the number of outpatient physical therapy visits attended during the patient's postoperative rehabilitation episode-of-care.
Post-operative PT baseline up to 24 weeks
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Post-operative 6 weeks
A self-report satisfaction survey will be administered. Patient Satisfaction consists of items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate better satisfaction.
Post-operative 6 weeks
NMES Satisfaction
Time Frame: Post-operative 6 weeks
NMES Satisfaction is a self-report survey and consists of items rated on a 5 point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate better satisfaction.
Post-operative 6 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NMES Intensity
Time Frame: Post-operative PT baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (primary endpoint), 6 weeks, up to 24 weeks
The magnitude of NMES-induced muscle contraction elicited by patient.
Post-operative PT baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks (primary endpoint), 6 weeks, up to 24 weeks
NMES Adherence
Time Frame: Post-operative week 6
The proportion of prescribed NMES minutes completed by a patient will be measured by NMES unit.
Post-operative week 6
RE-AIM Reach
Time Frame: Throughout experimental phase (about 2.5 years)
Proportion of patients treated with NMES out of all eligible patients
Throughout experimental phase (about 2.5 years)
RE-AIM Adoption
Time Frame: Throughout experimental phase (about 2.5 years)
Proportion of clinicians using NMES with at least 80% of eligible patients out of all trained clinicians at intervention clinics.
Throughout experimental phase (about 2.5 years)
RE-AIM Implementation
Time Frame: Throughout experimental phase (about 2.5 years)
Proportion of prescribed NMES time (15 mins, twice per day) completed by patient (measured by NMES unit) over the course of the study.
Throughout experimental phase (about 2.5 years)
RE-AIM Maintenance
Time Frame: 6 months following end of experimental phase
Proportion of clinicians using NMES with at least 80% of eligible patients out of all trained clinicians at intervention clinics.
6 months following end of experimental phase

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley, PT, PhD, University of Colorado, Denver

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The study team guarantees that all data collected as part of this project will be released in accordance with standard data sharing policies and procedures to validate research findings if requested. Data will be made available in a timely manner to the broader scientific community, and will be complete, and as accurate as possible. All data released will be de-identified, with no information that could be linked to any study subjects, or participating study practices to ensure the confidentiality of all subjects and practices. If necessary, a data use agreement will be established.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be made available 12 months after primary study publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be made available upon reasonable written request to the study team. The PI, Dr. Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley will review requests.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on NMES

Subscribe