Effect of Callisthenic Training on Mobility and ADL Performance in Spastic Diplegic Cerebral Palsy Patients

May 12, 2025 updated by: Foundation University Islamabad

Almost 2 to 3 out of every 1000 children have Cerebral palsy in Pakistan.Spastic type of CP is dominant about 75%, diplegia (40%) and hemiplegic are (35.5%).Spastic diplegics have tightness of lower limb more than upper limb.Their chief complaints are reduced mobility,impaired balance and coordination and lack of postural control and stability.Calisthenic training is sort of strengthening exercises in which patient use his/her own body weight as a resistance.

Calisthenic training aims to reduce movement limitation,contracture formation and improves patient's mobility for daily transfers and ambulation,active participation of patient in indoor and outdoor activities and enhance postural stability and controle during routine tasks. The current study aims to determine the effects of calisthenic training on mobility and ADL performance in spastic diplegic cerebral palsy children aged 5-12 years fulfilling the GMFCS criteria levels 1-3. A randomized control trial will be conducted in multidisciplinary lab of FUCP, department of physical medicine and peads and rehabilitation of Fauji Foundation Hospital on the sample of 32 participants. The subjects will be randomized into two groups by sealed opaque envelope method. Baseline assessment would be done by using WEEFIM measurement assessment scale for mobility and ADL performance, pediatric balance assessment Scale for postural control. Data will be collected at baseline before intervention, after 3 weeks and finally after 6 weeks of intervention. Interventional group will be receiving calisthenic training and conventional physical therapy while control group will be receiving conventional physical therapy alone. Exercise training would be done for a total of 12 sessions for 6 weeks, twice a week with each session lasting 45 minutes. Analysis would be done by using SPSS version 21. Ethical approval will be obtained from ERC of FUSH. Informed written consent will be obtained from all participants.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OBJECTIVES OF STUDY

  1. To determine the affects of callisthenic exercises in comparison to conventional physical therapy on mobility, ADL perfrmance and quality of life in spastic diplegic cp children .
  2. To determine the affects of callisthenic exercises in comparison to conventional physical therapy on postural controle in spastic diplegic cp

HYPOTHESIS:

Alternate hypothesis:

  • affect of calisthenic training in comparison to conventional physical therapy on mobility in spastic diplegic cp patients (p<0.05).
  • 2HA- There will be statistically significant difference in the affect of calisthenic training in comparison to conventional physical therapy to improve ADL performance in spastic diplegic cp patients (p<0.05).
  • 3HA- There will be statistically significant difference in the effect of calisthenic training in comparison to conventional physical therapy to improve postural controle in spastic diplegic cp patients (p<0.05).

NULL HYPOTHESIS

  • 1H0 -There will be no statistically significant difference in the effect of calisthenic training in comparison to conventional physical therapy to improve ADL performance in spastic diplegic cp patients (p<0.05).
  • 2H0 -There will be no statistically significant difference in the effect of calisthenic training in comparison to conventional physical therapy to improve mobility in spastic diplegic cp patients (p<0.05).

    3H0 -There will be no statistically significant difference in the effect of calisthenic trainingin comparison to conventional physical therapy to improve postural controle in spastic diplegic cp patients (p<0.05).

Significanve of study:

As there is no any Conclusive evidence of calisthenic training more precisely for spastic diplegic cp children so this study will be helpful for patients and other health care proffessionals to implement this study in their clinical practice and for the patients in a way they can keep continue this treatment protocol in their home bound friendly environment by using their own body weights as a resistance after quiting from sessions of this research .

it will provide a treatment protocol for targeting calisthenic training to improve mobility, incorporate postural corrections and functional capacitance in spastic cp children .

This study will maximize the indoor functional independency in the cerebral palsy

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Islamabad, Pakistan, 44000
        • Foundation University College of Physical Thrapy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 5 and 13 years
  • Able to accept and follow verbal instructions
  • Able to participate in a training program
  • Based on Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS SCALE 1,2 and 3)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If they have controlled seizures
  • If they suffered from any inflammatory, infectious diseases, cognitive deficiencies and any musculoskeletal deformity with chronic contracture that interfere with physical activity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: calisthenic training group

CALISTHENIC TRAINING

CALISTHENIC EXERCISES

COMMAND AND TARGET MUSCLE GROUP

  1. LEG RAISES (LEG STRENGTH) LIE ON YOUR BACK WITH YOUR LEGS STRAIGHT. LIFT LEGS OFF THE GROUND IN FRONT. LOWER THEM BACK DOWN WITHOUT TOUCHING THE FLOOR.

    TARGETS HIP FLEXOR

  2. SIDE LEG RAISES (LEG STRENGTH) LIE ON YOUR BACK WITH YOUR LEGS STRAIGHT. LIFT LEGS OFF THE GROUND AND TAKE IT TO SIDE MAXIMALL WITHOUT TOUCHING THE FLOOR.

    TARGETS LOWER ABS AND HIP ABDUCTORS

  3. GLUTE BRIDGES ( BACK STRENGTH) LIE ON YOUR BACK WITH YOUR KNEES BENT. LIFT YOUR HIPS OFF THE GROUND, SQUEEZING YOUR GLUTES. LOWER AND REPEAT. TARGETS GLUTES AND HAMSTRINGS.
  4. QUADRUPTED POSITION:

    ASK THE PATIENT TO RIDE YOUR KNEES PLAY 'HORSY' AND SLOWLY MOVE YOUR KNEES TO AND FRO AND SIDEWAYS SO THAT TO SHIFT WEIGHT FROM SIDE TO SIDE.

  5. WALL LEG LIFTS
  6. KNEELING
  7. Vertical Lift
  8. Squats

COMMAND AND TARGET MUSCLE GROUP

  1. LEG RAISES (LEG STRENGTH) LIE ON YOUR BACK WITH YOUR LEGS STRAIGHT. LIFT LEGS OFF THE GROUND IN FRONT. LOWER THEM BACK DOWN WITHOUT TOUCHING THE FLOOR.

    TARGETS HIP FLEXOR

  2. SIDE LEG RAISES (LEG STRENGTH) LIE ON YOUR BACK WITH YOUR LEGS STRAIGHT. LIFT LEGS OFF THE GROUND AND TAKE IT TO SIDE MAXIMALL WITHOUT TOUCHING THE FLOOR.

    TARGETS LOWER ABS AND HIP ABDUCTORS

  3. GLUTE BRIDGES ( BACK STRENGTH) LIE ON YOUR BACK WITH YOUR KNEES BENT. LIFT YOUR HIPS OFF THE GROUND, SQUEEZING YOUR GLUTES. LOWER AND REPEAT. TARGETS GLUTES AND HAMSTRINGS.
  4. QUADRUPTED POSITION:

    ASK THE PATIENT TO RIDE YOUR KNEES PLAY 'HORSY' AND SLOWLY MOVE YOUR KNEES TO AND FRO AND SIDEWAYS SO THAT TO SHIFT WEIGHT FROM SIDE TO SIDE.

  5. WALL LEG LIFTS IN STANDING STAND WITH YOUR SIDE FACING A WALL. LIFT YOUR LEG OUT TO THE SIDE AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE.

    LOWER AND REPEAT WITH THE OTHER LEG. TARGETS HIP ABDUCTERS

  6. KNEELING
  7. VERTICLE LIFT
  8. Squats
Experimental: conventional physical therapy group

CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL THERAPY

CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL THERAPY Week 1 Orientation of exercises Week 2-3 UPPER LIMB (20 MINS)

Lifting a glass of water with elbow extended Moving objects from the table to a box Combing Hairs LOWER LIMB (20 MINS) Lifting the lower extremity and lowering in o nto a footstool sit to stand Standing up with loaded trey in hand corner hamstring stretch butterfly stretch Week 4-5 UPPER LIMB (20 MINS) Grasping and releasing objects lifting a glass of water to a level of 90° shoul der flexion with an extended elbow Moving objects from the table to a box LOWER LIMB (20 MINS) Reciprocal leg flexion and extension single leg stance Kicking a ball

Week 5-8 UPPER LIMB (20 MINS) Opening Jars Throwing Balls Same As previous weeks LOWER LIMB (20 MINS) Squatting

CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL THERAPY CONVENTIONAL PHYSICAL THERAPY Week 1 Orientation of exercises Week 2-3 UPPER LIMB (20 MINS) Lifting a glass of water with elbow extended Moving objects from the table to a box Combing Hairs LOWER LIMB (20 MINS) Lifting the lower extremity and lowering in o nto a footstool sit to stand Standing up with loaded trey in hand corner hamstring stretch butterfly stretch Week 4-5 UPPER LIMB (20 MINS) Grasping and releasing objects lifting a glass of water to a level of 90° shoul der flexion with an extended elbow Moving objects from the table to a box LOWER LIMB (20 MINS) Reciprocal leg flexion and extension single leg stance Kicking a ball Week 5-8 UPPER LIMB (20 MINS) Opening Jars Throwing Balls Same As previous weeks LOWER LIMB (20 MINS) Squatting

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mobility
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The WeeFIM was used, it is an 18-item, 7-level ordinal scale. Each item is scored on a 7-level scale, with the total score ranging from 18 (lowest) to 126 (highest).
8 weeks
Activities of Daily Living Performance
Time Frame: 8 weeks

Will be measured by weefim functional independence measure scale. It is an 18-item, 7-level ordinal scale.

Each item is scored on a 7-level scale, with the total score ranging from 18 (lowest) to 126 (highest).

8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postural control
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Will be assessed by paediatric assessment scale It has 14 items and 5 level scale.1 indicating complete dependence and 5 indicating complete independence total score are 56.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 2, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 2, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Activities of Daily Living

Clinical Trials on calisthenic training

Subscribe