RaDIANT Health Systems Intervention

May 22, 2026 updated by: Rachel Patzer, PhD, MPH, Indiana University

The RaDIANT Health Systems Intervention for Improving Access to Kidney Transplantation

The overarching goal of the proposed study is to determine whether the addition of structural interventions at the health system level targeting upstream barriers in the transplant process will improve access to transplant evaluation start.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

14000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
        • Recruiting
        • Piedmont Transplant Institute
        • Contact:
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Recruiting
        • IU Health Transplant - Indianapolis
        • Contact:
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
    • South Carolina
      • Lancaster, South Carolina, United States, 29720
        • Recruiting
        • MUSC Mid-Carolinas Transplant Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Five large transplant centers (Emory Transplant Center and Piedmont Transplant Center in Atlanta, GA; Medical University of SC; Duke University in Durham, NC; and Indiana University in Indianapolis, IN) ~800 referring dialysis center referring to these transplant centers

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals referred, initiating evaluation, and waitlisted at non-participating start centers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multi-Component Intervention
Five participating transplant centers will multicomponent intervention in their management of patients referred to their transplant center for a kidney transplantation. The intervention will consist of: (1) required performance feedback reports on closed referrals; and a set of optional components that may be implemented variably by centers, including; (2) contacting patients via their preferred method; (3) phone calls to the dialysis facility during the patient's dialysis session; (4) phone calls to the referring or other provider; (5) use of a multi-module, secure, web-enabled software application called Transplant Referral EXchange (T-REX) or secure email to communicate patient status and no-show information; and (6) communication tracking and audit. Dialysis facilities in GA, NC, SC, and IN will receive resources to support an awareness campaign to support implementation of intervention activities within transplant centers.
Performance feedback reports will reflect each transplant center's performance related to kidney transplant evaluation initiation and referral closure. These reports aim to help centers understand common reasons why patients do not initiate the evaluation process or failed to proceed beyond the evaluation process, and to identify patterns in referral and evaluation closure practices. Reports will be individualized and distributed quarterly to the transplant center champion by the intervention lead.
As part of the intervention, dialysis centers will participate in an Awareness Campaign designed to educate staff about transplant center quality improvement efforts and how they may be contacted as part of the project. This campaign may include brief webinars or informative documents distributed via platforms such as IPRO Learn.
Transplant centers will contact patients using their preferred method of communication.
Facilities will enhance their patient communication procedures by making a phone call to the dialysis facility during the patient's dialysis session if the patient has not responded to initial outreach attempts. This additional step increases the likelihood of reaching the patient during a time when they are accessible and can engage in scheduling or follow-up.
Transplant centers will enhance their outreach procedures by making a phone call to the referring provider (e.g., nephrologist, medical assistant) or another provider involved in the patient's care (e.g., primary care provider) in the event of self-referral if the patient has not responded to initial outreach attempts or "no-shows" an initial evaluation appointment. This additional step ensures that the referring provider is informed of the patient's progress and can assist in re-engagement or decision-making prior to referral closure.
Transplant center staff will utilize transplant referral communication platforms and/or email to communicate updates to dialysis staff regarding patient status (e.g., unable to contact the patient or no-show) before referral closure.
Transplant center staff will continue internally tracking the frequency that a patient is contacted before closure and the date of closure, in alignment with center standard practice. This intervention introduces an audit process to be conducted before closure to ensure that all contact attempts (including one or more attempts to contact the patient directly, one or more phone calls to the alternate preferred contact, or one or more attempted contacts to the dialysis unit to connect with the patient), in alignment with center communication procedures, are appropriately executed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in transplant evaluation start within 6 months of transplant referral
Time Frame: Baseline, Post Intervention (Up to one year)
The difference in the proportion of patients starting transplant evaluation within 6 months of being referred from baseline to up to one-year post-intervention
Baseline, Post Intervention (Up to one year)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in transplant waitlisting
Time Frame: Baseline, Post Intervention (Up to one year)
The difference in the proportion of patients waitlisted from baseline and up to one-year post-intervention
Baseline, Post Intervention (Up to one year)
Change in transplant receipt among those who were waitlisted
Time Frame: Baseline, Post Intervention (Up to one year)
The difference in the proportion of patients who received a transplant among those who were waitlisted from baseline and up to one-year post-intervention
Baseline, Post Intervention (Up to one year)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 27, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)

Clinical Trials on Performance Feedback Reports on Referral and Evaluation Closures

Subscribe