Upfront Ultrasound for Preoperative Localization in Primary Hyperparathyroidism

January 13, 2026 updated by: Odense University Hospital

A Protocolled Implementation of Upfront Ultrasound (Sequential Pre-operative Imaging) in Primary Hyperparathyroidism in the Region of Southern Denmark

Primary hyperparathyroidism is caused by overactive parathyroid glands, leading to elevated calcium levels in the blood. The standard preoperative imaging includes both a radiation-based imaging modality and conventional ultrasound. However, ultrasound alone is a faster, safer, and more patient-friendly alternative. This study evaluates an upfront ultrasound approach, where patients undergo ultrasound first, and only those with certain findings proceed directly to surgery without additional imaging. Patients with uncertain findings proceed to additional imaging. The study is designed as a prospective cohort with a non-inferiority analysis, aiming to confirm whether upfront ultrasound can achieve an acceptable diagnostic sensitivity. If successful, this approach could reduce patient burden, minimize radiation exposure, and optimize healthcare resources

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This study evaluates the implementation of a stepwise approach using upfront ultrasound for localizing pathological parathyroid glands in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT).

PHPT is caused by overactive parathyroid glands, leading to excessive amounts of calcium in the blood, which can result in complications such as kidney stones, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and neurological symptoms. The standard preoperative imaging process currently includes both nuclear medicine scans and ultrasound. However, nuclear imaging is time-consuming, exposes patients to radiation, and may not always provide definitive results.

The proposed approach prioritizes ultrasound as the initial localization tool, with additional imaging reserved for cases where ultrasound findings are inconclusive. This method has the potential to reduce unnecessary hospital visits, minimize radiation exposure, and streamline the diagnostic process. The study aims to ensure that this approach maintains high sensitivity for the localization of pathological parathyroid glands, with a target sensitivity of at least 89.5% for correctly identifying diseased parathyroid glands.

Designed as a prospective cohort study, the project will assess patients using ultrasound first, assigning confidence scores (0-3) to determine whether further imaging is necessary. A confidence-score of 3 indicates a high diagnostic confidence. To gain a score of 3, the potential parathyroid adenoma must meet all predefined criteria, i.e. hypoechogenicity, well-defined margins, location at the anatomically expected position, a polar feeding vessel, and a vascular arc. A diagnostic-score of 2 reflects moderate suspicion, where one or two of these key features are missing. A diagnostic-score of 1 suggests low suspicion, typically characterized by a poorly defined structure with no vascular features. Finally, a diagnostic-score of 0 means that no potential adenoma was detected.

Postoperative findings will confirm the accuracy of the preoperative imaging with the histopathological result of the surgically removed specimen(s) combined with biochemical cure at 6 months as the reference standard.

The study aims to benefit both patients and society as it intends to decrease patient exposure to radiation, reduce costs, and reduce the time patients have to take off from work for the purpose of preoperative imaging. One less hospital visit will also reduce the pollution caused by an extra day of transportation to and from the hospital.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

99

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Odense University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients 18 years and older with primary hyperparathyroidism referred to the Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery at Odense University Hospital for parathyroidectomy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 18 years and older with primary hyperparathyroidism referred to the Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery at Odense University Hospital for parathyroidectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other causes of hypercalcemia
  • Persistent or recurrent hyperparathyroidism.
  • Previous surgery to the thyroid or the parathyroid glands.
  • Inability to read/speak Danish

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of the sequential imaging regimen (upfront ultrasound)
Time Frame: No residual disease 6 months after surgery
The primary outcome measure is the sensitivity of the sequential imaging regimen (upfront ultrasound) for localizing one or more pathological parathyroid glands to the correct quadrant of the neck. The reference standard is histopathology combined with biochemical cure.
No residual disease 6 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary outcome re-calculated for a theoretical cut-off at "diagnostic confidence score = 2"
Time Frame: No residual disease 6 months after surgery
The primary endpoint re-calculated with a theoretical cut-off at "diagnostic confidence score=2" as the criteria that leads to surgery without additional imaging.
No residual disease 6 months after surgery
Primary outcome re-calculated for a theoretical cut-off at "diagnostic confidence score = 1"
Time Frame: No residual disease 6 months after surgery
The primary endpoint re-calculated with a theoretical cut-off at "diagnostic confidence score=1" as the criteria that leads to surgery without additional imaging.
No residual disease 6 months after surgery
Per gland sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the sequential imaging regimen
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
Per gland sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of the sequential imaging regimen
6 months after surgery
Patients that didn't need supplementary imaging
Time Frame: 6 months post-surgery
Fractions of patients that didn't need supplementary imaging.
6 months post-surgery
Surgery duration
Time Frame: Immediately after surgery
Discrepancy between expected and actual duration of surgery.
Immediately after surgery
Unnecessary supplementary imaging
Time Frame: 6 months post-surgery
Fraction of unnecessary supplementary imaging
6 months post-surgery
Unnecessarily explored quadrants
Time Frame: 6 months post-surgery
Number of unnecessarily explored quadrants
6 months post-surgery
Complication rate
Time Frame: From surgery until one year after surgery
Complication rate in terms of recurrent nerve paralysis, post-operative hemorrhage, or permanent hypoparathyroidism
From surgery until one year after surgery
Cure rate
Time Frame: No residual disease 6 months after surgery
No hyperparathyroid hypercalcemia
No residual disease 6 months after surgery
Cost
Time Frame: Through study completion, from baseline to 6 months post-surgery
Cost of ultrasound, parathyroid scintigraphy and parathyroid choline PET/CT
Through study completion, from baseline to 6 months post-surgery
Confounding
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months post-surgery
Is the sensitivity influenced by differences in patient age, sex, BMI, adenoma weight, adenoma depth, adenoma diameter, multiple gland disease, preoperative ionized calcium and preoperative PTH?
Baseline to 6 months post-surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sanne H Michaelsen, MD, Odense Universitetshospital
  • Study Chair: Viveque Egsgaard, MD, PhD, Odense Universitetshospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 18, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 18, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Hyperparathyroidism

3
Subscribe