The Effect of Dual Task Training on Cognitive in Alzheimer's Disease

September 1, 2025 updated by: Burcu AKKURT, Fenerbahce University
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of dual-task training on cognitive functions in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a dual-task training group or a conventional exercise group. The intervention will last 8 weeks, with three supervised sessions per week. Cognitive performance, mobility, balance, and quality of life will be assessed before and after the intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Alzheimer's disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by impairments in memory, executive function, and daily activities. Conventional exercise programs may improve mobility and physical performance, but their impact on cognition is limited. Dual-task training, which integrates motor and cognitive activities simultaneously, has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance neuroplasticity and functional independence in individuals with cognitive decline.

In this study, participants diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease according to standard clinical criteria will be recruited. After baseline assessments, participants will be randomly allocated to one of two groups:

Experimental Group (Dual-Task Training): Participants will perform exercises combining cognitive tasks (e.g., arithmetic, memory recall, word association) with simultaneous motor tasks (e.g., walking, balance training, functional mobility exercises).

Control Group (Conventional Exercise): Participants will engage in standard physical exercises focusing on strength, flexibility, and balance, without added cognitive tasks.

The intervention will span 8 weeks, with three 45-60 minute sessions per week, conducted under supervision by a physiotherapist.

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes: Cognitive performance assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

Secondary Outcomes: Functional mobility (Timed Up and Go test), balance (Berg Balance Scale), and quality of life (QoL-AD questionnaire).

Hypothesis

It is hypothesized that dual-task training will lead to greater improvements in cognitive performance and functional independence compared to conventional exercise programs. This study may provide evidence supporting dual-task rehabilitation as a complementary approach in the management of Alzheimer's disease.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 60 years
  • Diagnosed with mild-stage Alzheimer's disease (According to DSM-5 or NINCDS-ADRDA criteria)
  • MoCA score between 10-25 (Indicating sufficient cognitive capacity for dual-task training)
  • Ability to walk independently or with minimal assistance
  • Adequate hearing and vision to enable communication
  • Physical and mental capacity to participate in the dual-task training protocol
  • Provision of written informed consent (signed informed consent form)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of advanced-stage Alzheimer's disease (MoCA < 10)
  • Presence of additional neurological disorders affecting the motor system (e.g. Parkinson's disease, stroke, multiple sclerosis)
  • Severe hearing or vision impairment (inability to respond to visual or auditory stimuli)
  • History of psychiatric disorders (e.g., major depression, schizophrenia)
  • Orthopedic or cardiopulmonary conditions that would prevent participation in dual-task training
  • Participation in another cognitive or physical rehabilitation program within the last 3 months
  • Individuals with unstable cognitive status due to recent medication changes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dual-task motor-cognitive training
Participants assigned to this group will undergo dual-task motor-cognitive training, which combines physical exercises with simultaneous cognitive tasks. Sessions will last 45-60 minutes, three times per week, for 8 weeks. Exercises will include gait and balance activities performed while engaging in cognitive tasks such as arithmetic, memory recall, or word association.
Participants assigned to this group will undergo dual-task motor-cognitive training, which combines physical exercises with simultaneous cognitive tasks. Sessions will last 45-60 minutes, three times per week, for 8 weeks. Exercises will include gait and balance activities performed while engaging in cognitive tasks such as arithmetic, memory recall, or word association.
Active Comparator: Conventional Exercise Training
Participants in this group will receive a conventional exercise program focusing on strength, flexibility, and balance without a cognitive component. Sessions will last 45-60 minutes, three times per week, for 8 weeks, and will be supervised by a physiotherapist.
Participants in this group will receive a conventional exercise program focusing on strength, flexibility, and balance without a cognitive component. Sessions will last 45-60 minutes, three times per week, for 8 weeks, and will be supervised by a physiotherapist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
d2 Test of Attention
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
A widely used neuropsychological test evaluating visual attention and processing speed. Participants are asked to quickly and accurately mark target symbols (e.g., the letter "d" with two dashes) among distractors on a sheet consisting of similar letters and symbols.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Assesses visual attention, processing speed, and psychological flexibility. The participant is required to connect numbered circles from 1 to 25 in order as quickly as possible.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Stroop Test
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Stroop Test: Evaluates executive functions and attentional control. The participant must state the ink color of a word rather than reading the written word itself (e.g., the word "Blue" written in red ink should be answered as "red")
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B):
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B): Used to assess executive functions, cognitive flexibility, and attention. The participant alternates between numbers and letters in sequence (1-A-2-B-3-C…)
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): Evaluates memory, attention, executive functions, and visuospatial skills. It is a standard and validated tool for monitoring cognitive status and comparing pre- and post-intervention performance in Alzheimer's patients
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT): Measures processing speed and attention. Participants are presented with a key of symbol-digit pairings and asked to match as many symbols with their corresponding digits as possible within a set time
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS): A non-invasive method to measure prefrontal cortex activation by monitoring oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin levels
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD): Developed to assess independence in activities of daily living among individuals with dementia. It evaluates both basic and instrumental activities of daily living, including self-care and social functioning
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Dual Task Protocol
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Dual Task Protocol: Participants will perform physical and cognitive tasks simultaneously. For example, during walking, they will be asked to complete word generation, simple arithmetic, or other attention-demanding tasks
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Performance Measures: Walking speed
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Walking speed (measured using a metronome or gait analysis system).
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Performance Measures: Step count
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Step count (measured using a metronome or gait analysis system).
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Performance Measures: Number of correct response Number of correct responses
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Number of correct responses recorded during the secondary cognitive task.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Performance Measures: incorrect response
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Percentage of incorrect responses recorded during the secondary cognitive task.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Gait Analysis System: Walking speed during single-task walking
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Provides objective evaluation of walking dynamics using pressure sensors, motion capture systems, or accelerometers.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Gait Analysis System: Step length during single-task walking
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Provides objective evaluation of walking dynamics using pressure sensors, motion capture systems, or accelerometers.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Gait Analysis System:Balance during dual-task walking
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Provides objective evaluation of walking dynamics using pressure sensors, motion capture systems, or accelerometers.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Gait Analysis System: Postural control during dual-task walking
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Provides objective evaluation of walking dynamics using pressure sensors, motion capture systems, or accelerometers.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Electromyography (EMG)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks
Electromyography (EMG): Measures muscle electrical activity through surface electrodes, providing data on contraction duration, activation levels, and coordination (De Luca, 1997). EMG will be used to assess changes in motor control and muscle activation during dual-task training.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sümeyye AKÇAY, PhD, Fenerbahce University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

September 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease

Clinical Trials on Dual-Task Motor-Cognitive Training

Subscribe