Multi-center, Single Blinded, RCT, Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DTx to Improve ADHD

September 8, 2025 updated by: EMOTIV

A Multi-center, Prospective, Single Blinded, Randomized, Comparative, Pivotal Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Digital Therapeutics to Improve ADHD Symptoms of Patients Diagnosed With ADHD

Background:

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, and impaired executive functioning. It typically begins in childhood and is often first diagnosed at school age due to learning and social behavioral difficulties. Therefore, ADHD treatment aims to directly enhance attention, reduce hyperactivity and impulsivity, and ultimately improve task performance and associated behavioral and relational issues.

Objective of the Clinical Trial:

To evaluate the safety of the investigational digital therapeutic device for the treatment of ADHD.

To evaluate the efficacy of the investigational digital therapeutic device for the treatment of ADHD.

Study Design & Methodology:

A total of 122 participants were enrolled (62 in the treatment group and 60 in the control group), with 114 participants included in the Full Analysis Set (FAS: 58 treatment, 56 control).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Expanded Clinical Summary: Investigational Digital Therapeutic Device for ADHD

[Background and Rationale] Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by a persistent pattern of inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, and impairments in executive function. These symptoms typically begin in childhood and are often first identified in school-aged children due to learning difficulties or social behavioral issues.

Effective treatment of ADHD aims to improve sustained attention, reduce hyperactivity and impulsivity, and enhance the patient's ability to engage in academic, social, and daily life activities. While pharmacological interventions have been the mainstay of treatment, increasing attention has been directed toward non-pharmacologic and digital therapeutic approaches, particularly those that can target cognitive mechanisms such as executive functioning through neuroplasticity-enhancing modalities.

[Objectives of the Clinical Trial]

The aim of this clinical investigation was twofold:

To assess the safety of the investigational digital therapeutic (DTx) device when used by children diagnosed with ADHD.

To evaluate the efficacy of the DTx in improving core symptoms of ADHD compared to a sham (placebo) digital intervention.

[Study Design and Methodology] This was a prospective, multi-center, single-blind, randomized controlled confirmatory trial involving two arms: an experimental group receiving the active digital therapeutic intervention and a control group receiving a digital sham.

The investigational DTx is a game-based software intervention designed to train cognitive flexibility, working memory, and inhibitory control - core executive functions associated with ADHD - through repetitive and engaging digital activities.

-Primary Outcomes: ADHD-RS (Investigator-Rated Scale)

-Secondary Outcomes: Additional cognitive and behavioral endpoints further supported the efficacy of the intervention.

  • Parent-rated ADHD-RS-IV (Korean ADHD Rating Scale, K-ARS)
  • Stroop Color-Word Interference Test (color-word score)
  • Advanced Test of Attention (ATA), visual sensitivity score
  • CGI-S(Clinical Global Impression-Severity)
  • CGI-I(Clinical Global Impression-Improvement)
  • CCTT(Children's Color Trails Test)
  • K-CPRS(Korean-Conners Parents Rating Scale)
  • WCST(Wisconsin Card Sorting Test)
  • Changes in Medication Dosage
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes

[Safety Evaluation] Safety was assessed throughout the study period by monitoring adverse events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • gangnam
      • Seoul, gangnam, South Korea, 06179
        • Emotiv

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must meet all the following inclusion criteria:
  • Children and adolescents aged 6 years or older but under 13 years, both male and female.
  • Diagnosed with ADHD according to DSM-5 criteria or ICD-10 diagnosis of ADHD (F90.0).
  • K-ARS scores of 18 or higher for females and 22 or higher for males.
  • No changes in ADHD medication dosage or regimen within 1 month prior to enrollment (*For those receiving pharmacological treatment with methylphenidate or amphetamine-based products, a washout period of 14 days is required if they wish to participate after discontinuing medication).
  • Medically healthy based on medical history and vital signs assessed during screening, without other medical abnormalities.
  • Able to use a smartphone or tablet PC that meets specified requirements to operate the mobile application without difficulty.
  • Both the subject and their guardian voluntarily agree to participate and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria:
  • Presence of any of the following psychiatric symptoms at baseline: chronic tic disorder (requiring medication), Tourette's disorder, or history of major obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, conduct disorder, or other childhood psychosis (affective disorders are not exclusionary).
  • Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) score below 80.
  • Presence of congenital genetic disorders.
  • Uncontrolled or severe systemic physical illness requiring hospitalization at baseline.
  • Suicide attempt within the past 3 months and assessed as high suicide risk by a psychiatrist.
  • Initiation or ongoing other cognitive behavioral therapy within the past 3 months (including any CBT for ADHD or other conditions, based on insurance coverage).
  • Presence of visual, auditory, or cognitive impairments.
  • Any other reasons deemed by the investigator to make the subject unsuitable for participation in the clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The treatment group used the device with driving and N-BACK cognitive training functions.
The treatment group participated in the clinical trial by using the investigational digital therapeutic device, which incorporated both driving simulation and N-BACK cognitive training functions. These features were designed to engage and improve key cognitive abilities such as attention, working memory, and executive function, which are often impaired in individuals with ADHD. The combined use of driving tasks and N-BACK exercises aimed to provide a comprehensive and interactive therapeutic intervention to help reduce core ADHD symptoms.
The investigational device incorporated both a driving simulation and an N-Back cognitive training function. These features were designed to engage and improve key cognitive abilities such as attention, working memory, and executive function, which are often impaired in individuals with ADHD. The combined use of driving tasks and N-Back exercises aimed to provide a comprehensive and interactive therapeutic intervention to reduce core ADHD symptoms.
Sham Comparator: The control group used a device that included only the driving function, without the N-BACK cognitiv
The control group participated in the clinical trial using a digital device that incorporated only the driving simulation function. Unlike the treatment group, this device did not include the N-BACK cognitive training component. The driving function served as a digital placebo (sham) intervention designed to mimic the user experience without providing the active therapeutic elements targeting cognitive functions. This setup allowed for a controlled comparison to evaluate the efficacy of the combined intervention in the treatment group.
The placebo device incorporated only the driving simulation function and excluded the N-Back cognitive training component. The driving simulation was designed as a sham intervention to mimic the user experience without providing the active therapeutic elements targeting cognitive functions. This setup enabled a controlled comparison with the active digital therapeutic device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in ADHD-RS (Investigator-Rated Scale) at end of treatment (FAS)
Time Frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.

The Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS, Investigator-Rated) is a clinician-administered assessment tool based on the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD.

It includes 18 items, with 9 items assessing inattention and 9 items assessing hyperactivity/impulsivity.

Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = never or rarely, 3 = very often).

The total score reflects overall ADHD symptom severity, with higher scores indicating greater severity.

The investigator-rated version is completed by a trained clinician through interviews and behavioral observations, rather than by parents or teachers.

The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ADHD-RS-IV (Parent-rated, Korean version)
Time Frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.

The Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV, Parent-rated, Korean version) is a standardized rating scale based on the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for ADHD.

It consists of 18 items corresponding to the inattention (9 items) and hyperactivity/impulsivity (9 items) symptom domains.

Parents rate the frequency of each symptom on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never or rarely) to 3 (very often).

The Korean version has been translated and validated for use in Korean populations.

Higher scores indicate greater severity of ADHD symptoms.

The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
CGI-S(Clinical Global Impression-Severity)
Time Frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.

The Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scale is a 7-point clinician-rated scale that assesses the clinician's global impression of the patient's current illness severity at the time of evaluation.

The scale ranges from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients).

It provides a simple, standardized measure of overall illness severity, independent of specific symptom rating scales.

The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
CGI-I(Clinical Global Impression-Improvement)
Time Frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
The Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) scale is a 7-point clinician-rated scale used to assess how much a patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to baseline.
The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
CCTT(Children's Color Trails Test)
Time Frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.

The Children's Color Trails Test (CCTT) is a neuropsychological assessment tool designed to evaluate cognitive functions in children, particularly:

  • Attention and sustained focus
  • Cognitive flexibility (set-shifting, task-switching)
  • Processing speed
  • Executive functioning
The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
Stroop
Time Frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
The Stroop Test (Stroop Color and Word Test) is a widely used neuropsychological assessment designed to measure attention, selective attention, processing speed, and inhibitory control, which are key aspects of executive function.
The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
Changes in Medication Dosage
Time Frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
Changes in Medication Dosage refers to any adjustments in the dose of a participant's prescribed ADHD medication during the study period.
The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.
Patient-Centered Outcomes
Time Frame: The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.

Satisfaction (10-point)

Participants will rate their overall satisfaction with the intervention on a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

Task Difficulty (10-point)

Participants will rate the perceived difficulty of the tasks on a 10-point VAS, with higher scores indicating greater difficulty.

Suggestions for Improvement (Open-ended)

Participants can provide subjective comments or suggestions regarding the intervention.

Willingness to Pay (Objective)

Participants will indicate their willingness to pay for the intervention using a structured, objective questionnaire.

The digital therapy was administered over 4 weeks, including 6-7 visits (2-3 onsite, 4 phone). Screening and Baseline visits could occur on the same day. Final follow-up took place at week 4 post-treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 13, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

May 13, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

September 15, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ADHD

Clinical Trials on Model Name: EMT-SR01;red

Subscribe