Criterion-learning Naming Treatment For Addressing Comprehension Deficits in Aphasia

October 2, 2025 updated by: Erica Middleton, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network

Word Retrieval in Aphasia

Aphasia is a disorder of spoken and written language, most commonly following a stroke. It is estimated that between 2.5 and 4 million Americans are living with aphasia today. A common problem in aphasia involves difficulty retrieving known words in the course of language production and comprehension. The overarching goal of this project is to develop and test early efficacy, efficiency, and the tolerability of a lexical treatment for aphasia in multiple-session regimens that are comprised of retrieval practice, distributed practice, and training dedicated to the elicitation of correct retrievals. The aim of this work is to add to and refine the evidence base for the implementation and optimization of these elements in the treatment of production and comprehension deficits in aphasia, and make important steps towards an ultimate goal of self-administered lexical treatment grounded in retrieval practice principles (RPP) to supplement traditional speech-language therapy that is appropriate for People with Aphasia (PWA) from a broad level of severity of lexical processing deficit in naming and/or comprehension. This project cumulatively builds on prior work to develop a theory of learning for lexical processing impairment in aphasia that aims to ultimately explain why and for whom familiar lexical treatments work, and how to maximize the benefits they confer.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study examines a retrieval practice-based naming treatment termed criterion learning. In criterion learning, each item's assigned criterion level dictates the number of times that item is correctly retrieved before it is dropped from further training within a session. Criterion learning optimally incorporates potent learning experiences, including spaced retrieval practice with emphasis on correct retrievals during training. The present study will provide critical observations for optimizing criterion learning for treating word processing deficits in people with aphasia. This study will recruit 20 community-dwelling individuals with aphasia, who will undergo comprehensive neuropsychological characterization. Subsequently, participants will engage in an experimental treatment designed to promote improvements in word processing deficits.

This study will examine transfer from two types of naming treatment to word comprehension performance. Each PWA will perform naming treatment in one session at different dosages with a test of comprehension performance administered approximately one week and one month following treatment. Main outcomes of interest will be degree of transfer of each type of naming treatment to comprehension performance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States, 19027
        • Jefferson Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English as a native or primary language
  • Adults with stroke who are at least 6 months post-onset
  • Exhibit semantic comprehension deficit, defined as a minimum of 80 errors on word-picture verification pre-test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of comorbid neurological diagnoses, such as Multiple Sclerosis or Parkinson's Disease
  • History of a learning disability that significantly impacted language development, such as developmental language disorder
  • Insufficient stamina to participate in the protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Criterion-learning practice
This is a single-arm study
The experiments will be presented on a computer. On each criterion-learning trial, a picture is presented and the participant is asked to try to produce the name for the object with or without a cue. Correct-answer feedback is provided. Criterion learning involves presenting a block of items in fixed order, and on each trial, the experimenter or a voice-recognition component will code the response during the trial as correct/incorrect. When the item reaches its assigned criterion level, it is dropped from further training in a session.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trained comprehension items
Time Frame: approximately one-week and one-month following treatment
Word-picture verification task
approximately one-week and one-month following treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trained naming items
Time Frame: a single session held during a single day, scheduled at the participant's convenience but typically held within two weeks following pre-treatment assessment
Confrontation naming task that involves trained items
a single session held during a single day, scheduled at the participant's convenience but typically held within two weeks following pre-treatment assessment
Trained comprehension items
Time Frame: pre-treatment
Word-picture verification task
pre-treatment
Untrained comprehension items
Time Frame: pre-treatment, approximately one-week and one-month post-treatment
Word-picture verification task
pre-treatment, approximately one-week and one-month post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erica L Middleton, PhD, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

September 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 7, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 2, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Anonymized data and analysis code will be accessible on the Open Science Framework (OSF).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months following publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Anonymized data and analysis code will be accessible on the Open Science Framework (OSF).

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphasia

  • Teachers College, Columbia University
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia Non Fluent | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction | Aphasia, Rehabilitation
    United States
  • University of California, Berkeley
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and... and other collaborators
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Non-fluent | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia Following Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    United States
  • University of South Carolina
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Completed
    Stroke | Aphasia | Stroke, Ischemic | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia, Global | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Jargon | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Primary Progressive Aphasia(PPA) | Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Progressive Aphasia in Alzheimer's Disease
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (svPPA) | Nonfluent Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (nfvPPA) | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and...
    Active, not recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Enrolling by invitation
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia
    Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.; Universitat Pompeu Fabra
    Completed
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Wernicke | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Nonfluent
    Spain
  • Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital
    Not yet recruiting
    Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Post Stroke Aphasia | Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease
    India
  • Flint Rehabilitation Devices, LLC
    University of Texas
    Completed
    Broca Aphasia
    United States

Clinical Trials on Criterion-learning practice

3
Subscribe