Evaluation of the Galea-pericranium Flap in Reconstruction of Oral Cavity Defects

The overall objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of using the galea and pericranium (fascio-periosteal) temporal flap in the reconstruction of mandibular gingival defects.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Reconstruction with free flaps is a routine practice in head and neck surgery because of better functional, aesthetic results and generally higher success rates.

Current applications of this practice include reconstructive surgeries that follow excisions of neoplastic lesions involving the oral cavity. Following resection of the primary tumor, reconstructive surgery is usually necessary in order to restore function to the oral cavity.

The most appropriate reconstructive method is determined by several factors, including the characteristics of the defects and primary tumor site, the general medical condition, the patient's social history, the prognosis, and the surgeon's expertise. Reconstructive methods usually follow a "reconstructive ladder," starting with a skin graft and ending with a microvascular free flap.

Free tissue transfers are currently one of the most popular and reliable techniques for oral reconstruction.

The use of periosteal flaps for reconstruction of bone defects has been described by several authors. In particular, a well-known technique by Bettoni et al. [5] demonstrated excellent results, also in terms of bone regeneration, following the use of free periosteum flaps taken from radius in the treatment of osteoradionecrosis of mandible.

Free flaps of periosteum and osteoperiosteum of the medial femoral condyle have also been widely used for minimal bone reconstructions, such as those of the nasal bone, again with excellent results . However, harvesting these flaps is complex and the periosteum obtained is small in size.

Based on the assumption that the cranial region would provide surgeons with more options in terms of harvesting periosteum flaps to reconstruct soft and hard tissue defects, previous clinical experiences have explored the possibility of harvesting a galea and pericranium flap for reconstruction of oral mucosal defects resulting from excision of squamous cell carcinomas, obtaining positive results. Indeed, the temporal region is an important donor site in reconstructive surgery of the head and neck region, from which pedicled flaps of muscle, fascia, and skin can be harvested.

In particular, the vascular supply of the pericranial temporo-parietal region was evaluated in the above experience.

Previous clinical experience has demonstrated the efficacy of such a flap, used for the treatment of pharyngeal fistulas, as a revascularized free graft.

In conclusion, this type of flap has been shown to be functionally reliable for defects of the cervicofacial district, so we propose to apply it to parcellar defects of the oral cavity.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Emilia Romagna
      • Bologna, Emilia Romagna, Italy, 40138
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS - Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged ≥18 years;
  • Patients with mandibular gingival defects involving the anterior or lateral aspect of the mandible;
  • Patients in whom basal structural integrity of the mandibular bone is maintained;
  • Patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 months;
  • Obtaining informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with history of previous surgery that bilaterally altered the superficial temporal vasculature.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: patient
The study will involve patients referred to the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna who require simple reconstruction following parcellar resections of the mandibular gingival region. It is planned to recruit during the above period 5 patients who meet the following inclusion and exclusion criteria.

In our surgical approach, we have used periosteum, galea, or pericranium flaps for reconstruction of bone and tissue defects in the cervicofacial region, with excellent results. To treat mandibular osteoradionecrosis, we harvested periosteum flaps from the radius, demonstrating efficacy in bone regeneration. For minor defects, such as those of the nose, we used flaps from the medial femoral condyle, despite the complexity of harvesting.

The cranial region, particularly the temporo-parietal area, offered excellent vascularization, allowing the use of revascularized flaps for reconstruction of the oral mucosa after removal of carcinomas. These flaps have also been effective in the treatment of pharyngeal fistulas, proving to be a functionally reliable solution for oral cavity and cervicofacial defects.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
outcomes
Time Frame: 18 months
Number and % of patients with adequate flap viability, defined as effective vascular supply and complete rooting of the flap at the recipient site, without tissue necrosis. Partial viability will be considered as incomplete rooting of the flap with associated peripheral tissue necrosis affecting less than 1/3 of the surface de
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Achille Tarsitano, MD, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 11, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 11, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 11, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CMF-PC22

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Disease

Clinical Trials on Reconstruction following parcellar resections of the mandibular gingival region

Subscribe