- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07223710
Improving Walking After Spinal Cord Injury
Engaging Reticulospinal Inputs to Improve Walking Ability in Humans With Spinal Cord Injury
Locomotor recovery is one of the most important goals of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Ambulatory deficits severely impact daily functions resulting in lower quality of life for people living with paralysis due to SCI. Although studies have shown that locomotor training improves locomotor function in people with chronic SCI, the benefits remain limited. Our overall hypothesis is that we can engage additional descending motor pathways, such as the reticulospinal tract (RST), to improve locomotor function in humans with chronic incomplete SCI.
In this study we propose to test the effects of a novel intervention that uses repeated paired loud auditory and electrical stimulation of muscle afferents combined with locomotor training on walking speed and voluntary muscle strength.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Dalia De Santis
- Phone Number: 312-238-7895
- Email: ddesantis@sralab.org
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
-
Contact:
- Dalia De Santis
- Phone Number: 312-238-7895
- Email: ddesantis@sralab.org
-
Principal Investigator:
- Dalia De Santis, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Monica Perez, PT, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- History of traumatic or non-traumatic SCI ≥ 6 months
- International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) level at and above T10.
- American Spinal Injury Association AIS Grade C, or D
- Weakness in ankle dorsiflexors (LEMS<=3) with the ability to perform a small voluntary ankle dorsiflexion (as detected by presence of voluntary EMG activity in the tibialis anterior) with at least one leg.
- Ability to tolerate standing position.
- Ability to walk at a minimum speed of 0.1 mile/hour on a treadmill with less than 70% body weight support.
- Requires use of assistive devices (KAFO, AFO, cane, walker) or body weight support for ambulation.
- Ability to complete the 10-Meter Walk Test.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Preceding uncontrolled medical conditions including pulmonary, cardiovascular or orthopedic disease that interfere with physical performance.
- Intolerance to physical activity.
- Severe cognitive impairment that precludes the ability to participate in any of the study procedures or give verbal consent.
- Any illness or condition that based on the research team's assessment, will compromise with the patient's ability to comply with the protocol, patient safety, or the validity of the data collected during the study.
- History of stroke resulting in sensory motor deficits.
- Pregnant women.
- Participation in a high-intensity locomotor training program in the last 6 months.
- Inability to detect somatosensory evoked potentials
- Metal implant in the head
- History of epilepsy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Locomotor training + PAS
This intervention uses repeated paired loud auditory and electrical stimulation of muscle afferents combined with locomotor training. Participants will exercise walking on a treadmill with body weight support as needed for 30 minutes a day at a moderate intensity. While walking, participants will receive brief loud auditory stimuli through headphones and short electrical pulses through of electrodes positioned on two points in the leg |
This new intervention consists of locomotor training in combination with paired low-intensity electrical stimulation and stimulation of the reticulospinal tract through loud sounds.
Participants will receive auditory stimulation (LAS, 110dB, 500Hz, 50ms) through headphones and electrical stimulation through a pair of electrodes with 2cm inter-electrode distance positioned on the motor point over the quadriceps and the tibialis anterior muscles bilaterally.
The motor point will be identified as the position of the electrodes that elicits a small visible muscle twitch or muscle contraction upon palpation over the tendon with the minimum stimulation intensity.
Stimuli will be delivered with a pulse duration of 200 microseconds and will be timed to arrive at the level of the brainstem ~7ms before auditory signals.
Other Names:
Participants will walk on a treadmill with body-weight support (ZeroG, Aretech) in the range 0-70% as needed to prevent excessive knee flexion during stance phase or toe dragging during swing phase (Finch et al. 1991).
Each session will last approximately 60-min and the duration of the treadmill training will be timed to be 30 min.
Subjects will be encouraged to walk at a self-selected speed at or above 0.1m/s.
Speed and body-weight support will be adjusted to achieve a perceived exertion score of 4-5 (Moderate) in the Borg scale (Borg 1982).
Subjects will be allowed to rest as needed during the training sessions.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Locomotor training + SHAM
This sham intervention uses repeated paired soft auditory clicks and electrical stimulation of muscle afferents combined with locomotor training. Participants will exercise walking on a treadmill with body weight support as needed for 30 minutes a day at a moderate intensity. While walking, participants will receive brief auditory clicks through headphones and short electrical pulses through a pair of electrodes positioned on two points in the leg. |
Participants will walk on a treadmill with body-weight support (ZeroG, Aretech) in the range 0-70% as needed to prevent excessive knee flexion during stance phase or toe dragging during swing phase (Finch et al. 1991).
Each session will last approximately 60-min and the duration of the treadmill training will be timed to be 30 min.
Subjects will be encouraged to walk at a self-selected speed at or above 0.1m/s.
Speed and body-weight support will be adjusted to achieve a perceived exertion score of 4-5 (Moderate) in the Borg scale (Borg 1982).
Subjects will be allowed to rest as needed during the training sessions.
Participants will receive brief low-intensity auditory clicks (80dB, 500Hz, 50ms) through headphones and electrical stimulation through a pair of electrodes with 2cm inter-electrode distance positioned on the motor point over the quadriceps and the tibialis anterior muscles bilaterally.
The motor point will be identified as the position of the electrodes that elicits a small visible muscle twitch or muscle contraction upon palpation over the tendon with the minimum stimulation intensity.
Stimuli will be delivered with a pulse duration of 200 microseconds and will be timed to arrive at the level of the brainstem ~7ms before auditory signals.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
10-meter walk test (10MWT)
Time Frame: baseline and day 12
|
This standardized test assesses walking speed in meters per second over a short duration.
|
baseline and day 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Motor Evoked Potentials conditioned with Startle (MEP-LAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and day 12
|
Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) will be recorded from multiple leg muscles following transcranial magnetic stimulation over the leg representation of the primary motor cortex and electrical stimulation over the thoracic spine.
Loud auditory Stimuli (LAS, 110dB, 500Hz, 50ms) will be delivered 50ms before magnetic stimulation to test for cortical effects of the intervention and 80ms before the electrical stimulation to test for subcortical effects of the intervention.
Stimulation intensity will be adjusted to obtain unconditioned MEPs of ~50% of the maximum MEP for each muscle.
|
Baseline and day 12
|
|
Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC)
Time Frame: Baseline and day 12
|
This will be measured on the electromyographic signal recorded during maximal isometric contractions.
Participants will perform three maximal contractions against resistance into knee flexion and extension, dorsiflexion, and plantarflexion.
Electromyographic activity will be monitored using surface electrodes placed on the belly of the quadriceps femoris, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, and soleus muscles bilaterally.
The MVC will be quantified as the maximum value of the average over 1s of activity in each of the repetitions.
|
Baseline and day 12
|
|
Maximal motor response (M-max)
Time Frame: Baseline and day 12
|
M-max will be elicited in the quadriceps femoris, tibialis anterior, soleus and foot muscles by applying percutaneous electrical stimulation over the femoral, common peroneal and the tibial and the medial plantar nerve, respectively using 200μs rectangular electrical stimulus.
The intensity of stimulation will be increased progressively until M-max is reached.
|
Baseline and day 12
|
|
StartReact response
Time Frame: Baseline and day 12
|
Participants will be asked to observe a light-emitting diode (LED) located ~1 m in front of the participants' head and will be wearing headphones.
When the LED will illuminate (20 ms), individuals will be asked to perform an isometric knee flexion/extension and/or ankle dorsi/plantarflexion as fast as possible.
Reaction times will be evaluated following a visual cue either alone (20 trials) or paired with a non-startling (80dB, 500Hz, 50ms, 20 trials) or a startling (110dB, 500Hz, 50ms, 20 trials) auditory cue.
Stimuli will be delivered every 5s in a randomized order.
Target muscles will be quadriceps femoris, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, and soleus muscles of the weaker leg.
The StartReact response will be computed as the difference between the reaction times during a non-startling and startling auditory cue
|
Baseline and day 12
|
|
Spasticity
Time Frame: Baseline and day 12
|
We will use the Modified Ashworth scale (six-point ordinal scale, 0-4) to measure resistance encountered during manual passive muscle stretching.
|
Baseline and day 12
|
|
SCI-QOL
Time Frame: Baseline and day 12
|
Is a battery of questionnaires evaluating the quality of life.
Will be used to measure the participant-related following aspects: (a) Ambulation: This questionnaire will ask the participant about their ability to do thing like walk, run and jump.
(b) Basic Mobility: This questionnaire will ask the participant about their ability to perform their daily routine.
(c) Fine Motor: This questionnaire will ask the participant about their ability to pick up small objects.
(d) Manual and Power Wheelchair Mobility: This questionnaire ask the participant about their ability using a wheelchair.
(e) Self-Care: This questionnaire will ask the participant about their ability to do activities of daily living such as getting dressed, bathing, and eating.
|
Baseline and day 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Dalia De Santis, PhD, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STU00222004
- R03HD114768-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury
-
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneRecruitingChronic Spinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) | Spinal Cord Injury | SCI - Spinal Cord Injury | SCI | Subacute Spinal Cord InjurySwitzerland
-
Lian-Cing Yan, MSPTNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Stimulation | Spinal Cord Injury/Damage | Spinal Cord Injury Thoracic | Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) | Spinal Cord Injury T1-L2 | Epidural Electrical StimulationTaiwan
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingBeijing Pins Medical Co., Ltd; Beijing Xinzhida Neural Technology Co., Ltd; Hangzhou...RecruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Motor Deficits | Gait Impairment | Gait Training | Spinal Cord Injury Cervical | Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) | Motor Impairment | Spinal Cord Injury, Chronic | Spinal Cord Injury Thoracic | Spinal Cord Injury (Quadraplegia)China
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanThe Industrial Technology Research InstituteUnknownSpinal Cord Injuries | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryTaiwan
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNot yet recruitingSpine Injury | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury | Cord Injury, Spinal | Cord Infarction Spinal
-
University of FloridaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedSCI - Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
Jill M. Wecht, Ed.D.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRecruitingBlood Pressure | Spinal Cord Injuries | SCI - Spinal Cord Injury | Blood Pressure Disorders | Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury | Acute Spinal Cord Injury | Neuromodulation | Spinal Cord StimulationUnited States
-
NervGen PharmaTerminatedSpinal Cord Injuries | Chronic Spinal Cord Injury | Subacute Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
MetroHealth Medical CenterNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Case Western...RecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Spinal Cord Injury CervicalUnited States
-
Anne BrydenNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Case Western... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Spinal Cord Injury Cervical | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Complete Lesion | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Incomplete LesionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Paired Associative Stimulation
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalCompleted
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthCompletedAlzheimer's DiseaseCanada
-
University Hospital, ToulouseCompleted
-
Ben-Gurion University of the NegevSoroka University Medical CenterRecruitingNeurodevelopmental Disorders | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Prefrontal Cortex Dysregulation | Cortical Arousal ImbalanceIsrael
-
Emory UniversityTerminatedCerebrovascular StrokeUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabRecruiting
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalCompleted
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalUniversity of Helsinki; Validia Rehabilitation CenterCompletedSpinal Cord Diseases | Spinal Cord InjuriesFinland
-
Medical University of South CarolinaCompletedDepressive Disorder | DepressionUnited States
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalUniversity of Helsinki; Validia RehabilitationCompleted