Risks and Benefits of Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CEAP C3-C6) in Patients Aged 80 and Over

Risks and Benefits of Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CEAP C3-C6) in Patients Aged 80 and Over: A Prospective Single-Arm Cohort Study

The prevalence of severe chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is significant in the growing octogenarian population. While radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a standard minimally invasive treatment, robust data on its outcomes and safety profiles specifically in patients aged 80 years and older remain scarce. This study aims to evaluate the risks and benefits of RFA in this specific, high-risk demographic.This prospective, single-arm, single-center cohort study will enroll 50 patients (initial target sample size) aged ≥80 years with CVI classified as CEAP C3 to C6 and with confirmed great or small saphenous vein reflux. All participants will undergo endovenous RFA under tumescent local anesthesia. The primary outcomes are: 1) the great/small saphenous vein occlusion rate at 6 months, assessed by duplex ultrasonography, and 2) the change in disease-specific quality of life from baseline to 6 months, measured by the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ). Secondary outcomes include occlusion rates at 1 and 3 months; complication rates (e.g., deep vein thrombosis, skin burns, paresthesia) within 30 days; and changes in the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) at predefined intervals over 6 months.This study is designed to demonstrate a high technical success rate (occlusion rate >95% at 6 months) and a statistically significant improvement in AVVQ and VCSS scores at 6 months post-procedure. The collected data will provide a detailed profile of complication rates, characterizing the safety of RFA in this very elderly cohort.This study will provide crucial, prospective evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of RFA for treating CVI in octogenarians. The findings are expected to guide clinical decision-making and inform treatment guidelines for this vulnerable and expanding patient population.

Study Overview

• Status: Recruiting
• Conditions: Cohort Study; Radiofrequency Ablation; Chronic Venous Insufficiency, CVI; Octogenarians(Aged 80 and Over)
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Estimated): 50

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Chunshui He Doctor; Phone Number: 18981885601; Email: Chunshuihe@msn.com

Study Locations

• China
  • Sichuan
    • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610072
      • Recruiting
      • Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
      • Contact: Chunshui He Doctor; Phone Number: 18981885601; Email: zhanghq@stu.cdutcm.edu.cn

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of patients aged 80 years and older who are diagnosed with symptomatic, severe chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), classified as CEAP clinical classes C3 through C6, and have confirmed great or small saphenous vein reflux.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Age: Aged 80 years or older.

2. Clinical Diagnosis: Symptomatic chronic venous insufficiency of the lower extremity, with the highest clinical class (CEAP classification) being one of the following:

   • C3: Venous edema
   • C4a: Pigmentation or eczema
   • C4b: Lipodermatosclerosis or atrophie blanche
   • C5: Healed venous ulcer
   • C6: Active venous ulcer
3. Confirmed Reflux: Color duplex ultrasound examination confirming reflux (reflux time > 0.5 seconds) in the great saphenous vein (GSV) and/or small saphenous vein (SSV) of the target limb.
4. Informed Consent: The patient or their legally authorized representative is able to understand and voluntarily provides written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Participants who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:

  1. Mobility: Non-ambulatory or bedridden.
  2. Thrombosis: Presence of acute superficial thrombophlebitis of the target vein, or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the target limb.
  3. Arterial Disease: Significant peripheral arterial disease, defined as an ankle-brachial index (ABI) < 0.8 in the target limb.
  4. Coagulopathy: Uncorrectable coagulation disorder.
  5. Allergy: Known severe allergy to local anesthetics (e.g., lidocaine) or relevant device materials.
  6. Cognition & Compliance: Severe cognitive impairment or psychiatric illness that, in the investigator's judgment, precludes adequate understanding and cooperation for the study procedures and follow-up.
  7. Life Expectancy: Life expectancy of less than 1 year due to other comorbid conditions (e.g., terminal malignancy).
  8. General Unsuitability: Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the patient unsuitable for participation in the study.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Great/Small Saphenous Vein Occlusion Rate at 6 Months		6 Months
Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ)	Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 100 Interpretation of Higher Scores: A higher score indicates more severe symptom distress and greater impact on quality of life caused by varicose veins in patients. For example, it reflects more obvious discomforts such as leg pain, a heavy sensation in the legs, and swelling.	6 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Kulkarni SR, Slim FJ, Emerson LG, Davies C, Bulbulia RA, Whyman MR, Poskitt KR. Effect of foam sclerotherapy on healing and long-term recurrence in chronic venous leg ulcers. Phlebology. 2013 Apr;28(3):140-6. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2011.011118.
• Williamsson C, Danielsson P, Smith L. Catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy for chronic venous leg ulcers. Phlebology. 2014 Dec;29(10):688-93. doi: 10.1177/0268355513505506. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
• Mohamed AH, Howitt A, Rae S, Cai PL, Hitchman L, Wallace T, Nandhra S, Pymer S, Knighton A, Smith G, Chetter IC, Carradice D. Ten-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of endothermal ablation versus conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2024 Aug 2;111(8):znae195. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae195.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 1, 2025
• Primary Completion (Estimated): May 30, 2026
• Study Completion (Estimated): September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 28, 2025
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 16, 2025
• First Posted (Actual): November 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): November 18, 2025
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 16, 2025
• Last Verified: September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neurologic Manifestations; Nervous System Diseases; Eye Diseases; Vision Disorders; Sensation Disorders; Blindness; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms; Signs and Symptoms; Blindness, Cortical
• Other Study ID Numbers: ChengduUTCM 121

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No