Towards Restoring Complex Movement After Paralysis: Algorithm Development With Healthy Participants

December 22, 2025 updated by: Jonathan Kao, University of California, Los Angeles

Restoring Complex Movement and Locomotion After Paralysis Through Collaborative Copilots: Algorithm Development With Healthy Participants

Participants will perform experiments with non-invasive activity recordings. The study will record from multiple non-invasive signal sources that reflect motor intent that may include: electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG), functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), inertial measurement units (IMUs), eye movements, pupil size, and speech. Participants will wear all or a subset of these sensors and be asked to perform, imagine, or attempt movements or speech. The recorded sensor signals will be decoded to help guide an end effector, which may be a computer, robotic arm, wheelchair, or other assistive device.

These experiments present minimal risk and participants may withdraw participation at any time for any reason. Participants may return for additional experiments if desired and to perform additional comparisons. If a participant withdraws during a comparison, another participant will be recruited to complete collection of data for that comparison.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Recruiting
        • UCLA Neural Engineering and Computation Lab
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fluent in the English language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological injury or disease that results in functional paralysis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Healthy Participants
Participants will perform a subset of tasks while non-invasive activity is recorded which may include EEG, EMG, IMUs, fNIRS, eye gaze, or pupillometry.
Participants may be prompted to imagine, attempt, or perform actions while a task is being performed on a computer, robotic arm, wheelchair, or exoskeleton. Participants may also autonomously perform actions to control each end effector. Participants may be asked to control a cursor to acquire a target or multiple targets. Participants may be asked to pick and place various objects, interact with articulated objects, or perform other motor tasks using a robotic manipulator. Participants may be asked to navigate a wheelchair.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Normalized Performance
Time Frame: Usually one visit (Day 1), with possible additional study visits usually within a month.
The normalized performance of the non-invasive assistive interface on a task. Non-invasive signals, which may include electroencephalography, electromyography, functional near infrared spectroscopy, inertial measurements units, eye movements, pupil size, and speech are input into an algorithm that controls an end effector's movements. The end effector, which may be a computer cursor, robotic manipulator, wheelchair, or other assistive device, is used to perform a motor task. The normalized performance is derived from the the performance of the end effector on the motor task, reflecting the overall performance of the non-invasive assistive interface. The minimum value is zero. There is no maximum value, although the values are usually less than 1. Higher is better.
Usually one visit (Day 1), with possible additional study visits usually within a month.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan Kao, PhD, UCLA Neural Engineering and Computation Lab

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 26, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

November 19, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 25-1072
  • 1DP1HD121548-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

  • Identifier data, along with non-invasive activity (e.g., EEG, EMG, fNIRS, IMU, eye gaze) and corresponding behavior (e.g., cursor kinematics, robotic arm joint angles, wheelchair kinematics) will be generated for participants. The species is human, format .bin (binary file), amount per experiment approximately 6 GB.
  • Non-invasive activity and corresponding behavior will be preserved and shared, corresponding to nonidentifiable data collected during experiments.
  • Documentation will be provided to facilitate interpretation of the data.
  • Specialized tools, software, or code are not needed. The data is stored in Python, which is freely available, and can be loaded following documentation.
  • No consensus standard exists. These will be custom datasets for the particular experimental tasks. All data will be de-identified before sharing.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available no later than the time of an associated publication or the end of performance period of the extramural award that generated the data, whichever comes first. DASH, which is an NIH-recommended domain-specific repository, has usually long retention cycles and will often host data "in perpetuity." The PI will not take down the data any sooner.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Scientific data and metadata will be archived on NICHD Data and Specimen Hub (DASH). DASH automatically assigns a digital object identifier (doi) to data files.

DASH is an NIH-controlled-access data repository. The NICHD DASH Data Access Committee reviews all requests to access DASH data and biospecimens from identity-verified requesters to determine whether the proposed use is scientifically and ethically appropriate and does not conflict with constraints or research data use limitations identified by the institutions that submitted the research data. The Recipient's institution and the Recipient must sign and agree to the terms and conditions.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Movement Disorders

Subscribe