Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Home-Based Exercise for Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tears

November 17, 2025 updated by: Carlos Fernández-Morales, Universidad de Extremadura

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Home-Based Exercise in Patients With Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tears: A Prospective Controlled Study

This study evaluates the clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections compared with a home-based exercise program in patients with partial-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon. Partial supraspinatus tears are a common cause of chronic shoulder pain and functional limitation. PRP has been proposed as a biological treatment that may promote tissue healing, while therapeutic exercise remains a standard conservative intervention.

This prospective, controlled study includes two parallel groups. The PRP group receives three monthly ultrasound-guided intratendinous PRP injections, preceded by local anesthesia. The control group follows a structured home-based exercise program for the same overall treatment period. All participants are assessed at baseline and again two months after completing their assigned intervention.

The primary outcome is shoulder pain measured with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include shoulder range of motion (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, internal and external rotation) and functional disability measured with the Constant-Murley Score. The study also analyzes whether patient characteristics such as age or sex are associated with clinical improvement.

The aim of this research is to compare two commonly used conservative treatment strategies and provide evidence to guide clinical decision-making for patients with partial-thickness supraspinatus tears.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Badajoz
      • Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain, 06006
        • University of Extremadura

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 20 and 70 years.

Shoulder pain for more than 6 months with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score > 4.

Partial-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon confirmed by ultrasound.

No improvement in VAS after conservative treatment with NSAIDs and/or physical therapy during the previous 6 months.

Willingness to undergo blood extraction and PRP infiltrations as required by the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 20 or > 70 years.

Full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus tendon.

Active infection (osteomyelitis, septic arthritis).

Current treatment with NSAIDs, antiplatelet agents, or systemic immunosuppressants.

Severe thrombocytopenia.

Positive serology (syphilis, HIV, HBV, HCV).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PRP Injection
Participants receive three monthly ultrasound-guided intratendinous injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in the affected supraspinatus tendon, preceded by local anesthetic infiltration in the subacromial bursa.
Ultrasound-guided intratendinous injection of 4 mL PRP prepared from autologous blood using the BS PRP SYSTEM-20 kit. A total of three injections are administered at one-month intervals. Local anesthesia with 5 mL mepivacaine 2% is applied subacromially prior to PRP administration.
Active Comparator: Home-Based Exercise Program
Active Comparator
A supervised-prescribed home-based shoulder exercise program including mobility, strengthening, and scapular stabilization exercises. The program is performed regularly over approximately three months, with progression based on clinical guidelines for rotator cuff rehabilitation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shoulder Pain (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months after completing the intervention.
Pain intensity measured using a 0-10 Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Higher scores indicate greater pain.
Baseline and 2 months after completing the intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shoulder Range of Motion (Flexion, Extension, Abduction, Adduction, Internal and External Rotation)
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months after completing the intervention.
Active shoulder range of motion measured using standard goniometry in degrees.
Baseline and 2 months after completing the intervention.
Constant-Murley Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months post-intervention.
Composite functional score assessing pain, daily activities, range of motion, and strength. Total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better shoulder function.
Baseline and 2 months post-intervention.
Roles and Maudsley Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months post-intervention.
Four-point scale evaluating patient-perceived outcome (1 = excellent, 4 = poor).
Baseline and 2 months post-intervention.
QuickDASH Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 2 months post-intervention.
Disability and symptoms of the upper limb measured with the QuickDASH questionnaire (0-100 scale). Higher scores indicate greater disability.
Baseline and 2 months post-intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Luis Espejo-Antúnez, Ph.D., University of Extremadura

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Injuries

Clinical Trials on Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)

Subscribe