Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in School-age Children to Decrease Community Transmission (CRITICal)

Cluster Randomized Trial of Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in School-age Children to Improve the Health of Students and Decrease Community Transmission

The CRITICal study aims to estimate the effectiveness of intermittent preventive treatment in school children (IPTsc) with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) for reducing community level malaria burden. Given that school-aged children are the primary drivers of transmission, the study hypothesis is that IPTsc will reduce this infectious reservoir and thus the burden of malaria in persons of all ages in surrounding communities.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The CRITICal study is an open label, phase IV, cluster-randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of IPTsc with DP administered approximately every 2 months to children attending primary school. Clusters are geographically defined target areas surrounding government-run health facilities previously established and referred to as Malaria Reference Centers (MRCs). A total of 24 clusters (MRCs) will be included in the study. These clusters were selected based on participation in an on-going sentinel site malaria surveillance network in areas with moderate-high malaria transmission intensity. Clusters will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio such that all primary schools serving the populations of each target area will either receive IPTsc or not receive IPTsc. The intervention will be delivered for 2 years and evaluations will continue for 1 additional year after the intervention is stopped. The primary outcome of the study will be malaria incidence within the population of the target areas. Secondary outcomes will include the the prevalence of parasitemia and molecular markers of DP resistance at the community level; the prevalence of parasitemia, anemia, and school attendance among children attending primary school; and estimates of the cost-effectiveness of IPTsc.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

4800

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child currently attending the participating school.
  • Agreement of parent/guardian to provide informed consent.
  • Agreement of children aged 8-17 years to provide assent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Missing school on three consecutive days of the school survey.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: IPTsc
DP will be administered approximately every 2 months for two years to all eligible children enrolled in primary schools serving the target areas from clusters randomized to the interventional arm.
D-Artepp, is manufactured by Guilin Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, and is prequalified by the WHO and approved for use in Uganda by the National Drug Authority. Standard treatment doses of DP (once a day x 3 days) will be administered using weight-based guidelines targeting a total dose of 6.4 mg/kg dihydroartemisinin and 51.2 mg/kg of piperaquine as per manufacturer's instructions.
Other Names:
  • D-Artepp
No Intervention: No IPTsc
No IPTsc (standard of care)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of cases of laboratory-confirmed malaria diagnosed among patients residing in the target area during the period the intervention is implemented
Time Frame: 24 months after intervention implemented
malaria incidence: the number of cases of laboratory-confirmed malaria diagnosed at the MRC among patients residing in the target area, per unit time, divided by the total population of the target area in patients of all ages over the 24-month intervention period
24 months after intervention implemented

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of cases of laboratory-confirmed malaria diagnosed among patients residing in the target area after the intervention is competed
Time Frame: 12 months after intervention is completed
malaria incidence: the number of cases of laboratory-confirmed malaria diagnosed at the MRC among patients residing in the target area, per unit time, divided by the total population of the target area in patients of all ages 12 months after intervention is completed
12 months after intervention is completed
Parasite prevalence among community residents 12 months after the intervention is implemented
Time Frame: 12 months after the intervention is implemented
Proportion of blood smears positive for parasites by microscopy at the time of community cross-sectional surveys
12 months after the intervention is implemented
Parasite prevalence among community residents 24 months after the intervention is implemented
Time Frame: 24 months after the intervention is implemented
Proportion of blood smears positive for parasites by microscopy at the time of community cross-sectional surveys
24 months after the intervention is implemented
Parasite prevalence among community residents 12 months after the intervention is completed
Time Frame: 12 months after the intervention is completed
Proportion of blood smears positive for parasites by microscopy at the time of community cross-sectional surveys
12 months after the intervention is completed
Prevalence of molecular markers of DP resistance from parasite positive samples from community surveys 12 months after the intervention is implemented
Time Frame: 12 months after the intervention is implemented
Proportion of parasite positive samples with molecular markers of DP resistance detected
12 months after the intervention is implemented
Prevalence of molecular markers of DP resistance from parasite positive samples from community surveys 24 months after the intervention is implemented
Time Frame: 24 months after the intervention is implemented
Proportion of parasite positive samples with molecular markers of DP resistance detected
24 months after the intervention is implemented
Prevalence of molecular markers of DP resistance from parasite positive samples from community surveys 12 months after the intervention is completed
Time Frame: 12 months after the intervention is completed
Proportion of parasite positive samples with molecular markers of DP resistance detected
12 months after the intervention is completed
Parasite prevalence among schoolchildren 12 months after the intervention is implemented
Time Frame: 12 months after the intervention is implemented
Proportion of blood smears positive for parasites by microscopy at the time of school surveys
12 months after the intervention is implemented
Parasite prevalence among schoolchildren 24 months after the intervention is implemented
Time Frame: 24 months after the intervention is implemented
Proportion of blood smears positive for parasites by microscopy at the time of school surveys
24 months after the intervention is implemented
Parasite prevalence among schoolchildren 12 months after the intervention is completed
Time Frame: 12 months after the intervention is completed
Proportion of blood smears positive for parasites by microscopy at the time of school surveys
12 months after the intervention is completed
Anemia prevalence among schoolchildren 12 months after the intervention is implemented
Time Frame: 12 months after the intervention is implemented

Proportion of children with anemia at the time of school surveys

Anemia defined based on WHO criteria as:

  1. hemoglobin less than 11.5g/dl in children 5 - 11 years of age;
  2. hemoglobin less than 12.0g/dl in children 12 - 14 years of age and non-pregnant girls 15 years and above; and
  3. hemoglobin less than 13.0g/dl in boys 15 years and above) 12 and 24 months after the intervention is implemented and school attendance (defined as the number of days attending school / number of days school in session) over the 24-month intervention period
12 months after the intervention is implemented
Anemia prevalence among schoolchildren 24 months after the intervention is implemented
Time Frame: 24 months after the intervention is implemented

Proportion of children with anemia at the time of school surveys

Anemia defined based on WHO criteria as:

  1. hemoglobin less than 11.5g/dl in children 5 - 11 years of age;
  2. hemoglobin less than 12.0g/dl in children 12 - 14 years of age and non-pregnant girls 15 years and above; and
  3. hemoglobin less than 13.0g/dl in boys 15 years and above) 12 and 24 months after the intervention is implemented and school attendance (defined as the number of days attending school / number of days school in session) over the 24-month intervention period
24 months after the intervention is implemented
Anemia prevalence among schoolchildren 12 months after the intervention is completed
Time Frame: 12 months after the intervention is completed

Proportion of children with anemia at the time of school surveys

Anemia defined based on WHO criteria as:

  1. hemoglobin less than 11.5g/dl in children 5 - 11 years of age;
  2. hemoglobin less than 12.0g/dl in children 12 - 14 years of age and non-pregnant girls 15 years and above; and
  3. hemoglobin less than 13.0g/dl in boys 15 years and above) 12 and 24 months after the intervention is implemented and school attendance (defined as the number of days attending school / number of days school in session) over the 24-month intervention period
12 months after the intervention is completed

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Grant Dorsey, MD, PhD, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CRITICAL
  • U01AI186861 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malaria

Clinical Trials on dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine

Subscribe