Does a Highly Filled Injectable Resin Composite Work Better Alone or in Combination With a Nanohybride Resin Composite? (nanoinjectcomb)

December 4, 2025 updated by: Tolunay Aytas

Does a Highly Filled Injectable Resin Composite Work Better Alone or in Combination With a Nanohybride Resin Composite? A Randomised Clinical Trial

This is a double blinded, randomized clinical study that evaluated the performance of a high filled injectable resin composite in polydiastema . The polydiastema disorders will be restored with high filled injectable resin composite (G'aenial Injectable Universal ) or anterior composite resin (G-aenial A'chord ). Restorations will be evaluated after 12 months according to FDI criteria and the data will be analyzed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

: The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the clinical performance of a high filled injectable resin composite with an anterior composite resin (G-aenial A'chord) in polidaiastemas.

Participants who are 18 years of age or older and healthy, and who have applied to the Restorative Dentistry Department of Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry to receive treatment for polidiastema disorders on their front teeth will be included in the study. After explaining the purpose and conditions of the study, they will be asked to sign an informed consent form. The gender, age, and tooth numbers of the participants to be treated will be recorded. 240 upper incisors of 60 patients will be treated, with attention paid to the balanced distribution of teeth in the right and left arches...Data were will be analyzed with Chi- Square, Fisher's Exact Test, Mann U tests

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye), 06230
        • Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Polydiastema should be such that the mesial, distal and buccal surfaces of the tooth are included in the restoration.

    • 2. The patient has polydiastema in at least teeth 12, 11, 21 and 22
    • 3. The patient does not have a systemic disease that would prevent restorative treatment.
    • 4. The patient voluntarily signs the informed consent form
    • 5. The patient does not have a physical disability that may prevent him/her from coming for a check-up.
    • 6. The patient does not have a history of spontaneous pain in the teeth to be included.
    • 7. The patient's teeth are alive
    • 8. The patient does not have any periapical pathology in the relevant tooth.
    • 9. The patient's tooth to be included in the study must be in a position to be restored by direct method.
    • 10. The patient is between the ages of 18-35
    • 11. The patient has class 1 and class 2 bite

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • 1.Participant must be under 18 years of age or over 35 years of age

    • 2. The participant has poor oral hygiene
    • 3. The participant has systemic disorders that may prevent regular attendance at treatment and control appointments.
    • 4. The participant has parafunctional habits such as clenching/grinding and biting foreign objects.
    • 5. Previous diastema closure or reshaping has been performed on the relevant teeth.
    • 6. Teeth whitening has been performed on the relevant teeth within the last week.
    • 6. Having severe periodontal problems in the relevant tooth
    • 7. The relevant tooth has previously been restored due to caries,
    • 8. The relevant tooth functions as a removable prosthesis support
    • 9. Teeth undergoing orthodontic treatment
    • 10. Finding the participant's breakeven and class 3 closure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Injectable
G-aenial Injectable (high filled injectable resin composite) group This study planned to investigate the clinical performance of G-aenial Injectable Universal (high filled ınjectable resin composite) in the treatment of anterior polydiastema disorders. This arm of the study is the group whose effectiveness was investigated. The results will be evaluated by comparing with a traditional anterior resin composite in terms of functional, biological and aesthetic properties.
Highly filled flowable injectable composite resin (G-ænial Universal Injectable, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used either as a sole restorative material or in combination with a nanohybrid composite for direct anterior veneers. For the injection process, a transparent PVS index (Exaclear, GC Corp.) was fabricated from a wax-up model and used to guide the placement of the material. In the combined technique, a 1-mm palatal layer of nanohybrid composite was placed first, followed by the injection of the flowable composite. The procedure aimed to improve adaptation, minimize voids, and optimize esthetic results compared to the conventional layering method.
Experimental: Combine
Restorations performed with a combined approach using a 1-mm palatal layer of nanohybrid composite resin (G-ænial A'Chord) followed by the injection of highly filled flowable composite resin (G-ænial Universal Injectable) guided by the PVS index.
Highly filled flowable injectable composite resin (G-ænial Universal Injectable, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used either as a sole restorative material or in combination with a nanohybrid composite for direct anterior veneers. For the injection process, a transparent PVS index (Exaclear, GC Corp.) was fabricated from a wax-up model and used to guide the placement of the material. In the combined technique, a 1-mm palatal layer of nanohybrid composite was placed first, followed by the injection of the flowable composite. The procedure aimed to improve adaptation, minimize voids, and optimize esthetic results compared to the conventional layering method.
Conventional nanohybrid resin composite (G-ænial A'Chord, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used for direct anterior veneer restorations. The material was applied using a free-hand layering technique following digital smile design and wax-up. A transparent silicone index (Exaclear, GC Corp.) was used for shape guidance when necessary. The enamel surfaces were etched with 37% phosphoric acid and bonded with a universal adhesive (G2 Bond, GC Corp.) before composite application. This intervention represents the standard clinical technique for direct composite veneers and serves as the active comparator group.
Active Comparator: Conventional
This group will serve as a "control". G-aenial Universal Injectable (high filled ınjectable resin composite) restorations will compare with the "G- Aenial A'chord" anterior resin composite restorations.
Conventional nanohybrid resin composite (G-ænial A'Chord, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used for direct anterior veneer restorations. The material was applied using a free-hand layering technique following digital smile design and wax-up. A transparent silicone index (Exaclear, GC Corp.) was used for shape guidance when necessary. The enamel surfaces were etched with 37% phosphoric acid and bonded with a universal adhesive (G2 Bond, GC Corp.) before composite application. This intervention represents the standard clinical technique for direct composite veneers and serves as the active comparator group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional properties score
Time Frame: 1 year

The primary factor for determining the clinical performance of a restorative material is the Functional properties. Visual tactile examination tools will be used for evaluating restorations according to FDI criteria by two experienced researchers at 1- week 6-, 12- months. The functional properties are scored as 1- clinically excellent, 2- clinically good, 3-clinically sufficient/satisfactory, 4-clinically unsatisfactory 5-clinically poor (replacement necesessry). Clinically 1, 2 and 3 scores are clinical acceptable but 4 and 5 scores are designated as failure.

[Time Frame: 1 year]

1 year
Esthetic properties score
Time Frame: 1 year
The secondary factor for determining the clinical performance of a restorative material is the Esthetic properties. Visual examination will be used for evaluating restorations according to FDI criteria by two experienced researchers at 1- week 6-, 12-months. The Esthetic properties are scored as 1- clinically excellent, 2-clinically good, 3-clinically sufficient/satisfactory, 4-clinically unsatisfactory 5-clinically poor (replacement necesessry). Clinically 1, 2 and 3 scores are clinical acceptable but 4 and 5 scores are designated as failure.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023/15-03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Polydiastema Disorder

Clinical Trials on Highly Filled Injectable Composite (G-ænial Universal Injectable, GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan)

Subscribe