Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Lesions (EURAGIL)

November 26, 2025 updated by: Bojan Kovacevic, Herlev Hospital

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Lesions - a Prospective Study

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the long-term clinical effectiveness of EUS-RFA and quality of life in patients with pancreatic or adrenal tumors recieving EUS-RFA.

Primary Objectives:

  • Clinical effectiveness: To evaluate the proportion of included patients who show doc-umented improvement in their clinical symptoms and biochemical parameters (blood test results) over time.
  • Patient satisfaction: To assess patient satisfaction with the procedure and subsequent disease-related quality of life, measured using validated questionnaires.

Secondary Objectives:

  • Safety: To determine the proportion of treated patients who experience complications, as defined by the AGREE classification, within 30 days after the procedure.
  • Technical success: To assess the proportion of included patients in whom the EUS-RFA procedure can be successfully completed.

Exploratory Objectives:

• To identify factors associated with adverse events and factors related to clinical success or lack there of.

The study is observational. All participant will receive EUS-RFA as part of their standard clinical care.

Participants will:

  • Undergo EUS-RFA, in which a fine needle is guided into the tumor using an endo-scope and ultrasound imaging. Radiofrequency energy is applied through the needle to heat and destroy tumor cells while protecting the surrounding tissue.
  • Have follow-up visits including blood tests, imaging scans, and clinical evaluations at regular intervals for up to 5 years after treatment.
  • Complete validated questionnaires about satisfaction and quality of life.

The study will include approximately 138 patients recruited between 2025 and 2035 from two Danish hospital departments (Herlev and Gentofte Hospital and Rigshospitalet). Data collection will continue until 2040 to assess long-term outcomes.

This study may help determine whether EUS-RFA can serve as a safe and effective alternative to traditional surgery for selected patients with small hormone-producing or benign tumors in the pancreas or adrenal glands, potentially reducing surgical risks and improving recovery and quality of life.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

138

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Capital Region
      • Herlev, Capital Region, Denmark, 2730
        • Recruiting
        • Herlev og Gentofte Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients who meet the above inclusion criteria will be offered participation. Herlev Hospital has a national function, and therefore patients from all regions of Denmark are included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with one or more lesions amendable to undergo EUS-RFA

    • Insulinomas ≤ 25 mm confirmed by a 72-h fasting test, cross-sectional scanning, and a biopsy with low Ki67 index (<10%)
    • Non-functional pNEN lesions between 10-20 mm and growing, confirmed by a biopsy with low Ki67 index (<10%), or larger pNEN lesions in patients who are not candidates for surgical treatment
    • Unilateral APA with benign characteristics on non-contrast enhanced CT located in the left adrenal and confirmed lateralization on AVS

      • Adult habile patients
      • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe multimorbidity (ASA score ≥ IV or ECOG performance score ≥ 4)

    • Uncorrected coagulopathy (INR >1.8 or thrombocyte count < 50 mia/L)
    • Pregnancy
    • Metastatic malignancy with expected remaining life expectancy < 3 years
    • Stenosis in upper GI tract or altered anatomy (e.g. previous gastrectomy) preventing the passage of an echoendoscope

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients undergoing EUS-RFA
The cohort consists of patients with benign pancreatic or adrenal tumors (patients with pNENs, MEN1 and Conns syndrome)
Observational study. Patients recieve standard clinical care with routine follow up

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: From enrollment and 5 years forward
Patient satisfaction measured through validated questionarie SF-36. Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable state
From enrollment and 5 years forward
Clinical efficacy
Time Frame: From enrollment and 5 years forward
Proportion of included patients with documented biochemical response and symptom improvement, or lesion size decrement/cessation of growth in case of MEN1 patients
From enrollment and 5 years forward

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events
Time Frame: From enrollment and 5 years forward
Proportion of treated patients experiencing AEs as defined by AGREE classification during a 30-day period following the procedure
From enrollment and 5 years forward
Technical success
Time Frame: From enrollment and 5 years forward
Proportion of included patients where EUS-RFA was technically feasible
From enrollment and 5 years forward

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Factors associated with adverse events
Time Frame: From enrollment and 5 years forward
Factors associated with adverse events
From enrollment and 5 years forward
Factors associated with clinical success or failure
Time Frame: From enrollment and 5 years forward
Factors associated with clinical success or failure
From enrollment and 5 years forward

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bojan Kovacevic, MD, ph.d., Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2040

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2041

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Radiofrequency Ablation

Clinical Trials on observational study

Subscribe