Usability Study of Gestational and Postpartum Weight Management Program (Hope-D_Use)

December 16, 2025 updated by: Turku University Hospital

Usability Study of Gestational and 6 Months Postpartum Weight Management Program - Hope D

The principal aim of this study is to evaluate the usability of the Hope-D gestational and 6 months postpartum weight management program. We will evaluate the usability, functionality, and acceptability of the developed Hope-D weight management program that includes digital pathway for weight management, general or individual weight management plan and individual or group coaching for weight management from pregnancy to 6 months postpartum.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The usability of the digital pathway will be evaluated through a one-week user test among up to 30 pregnant women, who have prepregnancy BMI at least 30 kg/m2.

Participants will use the Health Village digital pathway for gestational and 6 months postpartum weight management, after which they will take part in semi-structured interviews conducted via Microsoft Teams and complete the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire assessing perceived acceptability and usability.

All interviews will be audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed qualitatively.

Participants will report whether they accessed the pathway via mobile phone or computer and evaluate the technical usability, including ease of login, fluency of navigation, functionality of links, and the overall visual design.

The content of the digital pathway will be assessed in terms of relevance, usefulness, completeness, and clarity. Participants will be asked whether all key topics were covered, which elements were most beneficial or motivating, and whether the content was appropriate for both the gestational and postpartum periods.

All participants will provide feedback on the weight management plan. Participants will review the general plan and the individual plan. Feedback will address the perceived suitability of the plan to support gestational and postpartum weight management, appropriateness of the six-month postpartum evaluation point, and the feasibility of presenting the plan in the digital maternity card.

All participants will evaluate the group coaching component. After reviewing the session themes, they will assess the added value of group coaching, appropriateness of session content and timing, complementarity to standard care, and preferences for individual coaching.

Similarly, participants will evaluate the individual coaching component, assessing its added value, appropriateness of content and timing, complementarity to standard care, and potential preference for group-based coaching.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Finland
      • Turku, Finland, Finland
        • Recruiting
        • The wellbeing services county of Southwest Finland
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Pregnant women in the wellbeing services county of Southwest Finland, Turku area

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • General pregnant women with prepregnancy BMI at least 30 kg/m2
  • Competence in using the digital care pathway and electronic maternity card

Exclusion Criteria:

- Significant difficulty in cooperating (e.g. inadequate Finnish language skills)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Usability of digital pathway, general/individual weight management plan and group/individual coachin
The participants will evaluate the digital pathway with a general and an individual gestational and 6 months postpartum weight management plan and group as well as individual coaching provided by a trained study nurse.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The basic version of Hope-D program has been developed
Time Frame: 1 week

The aim of the Hope-D program is to develop a standardized model for gestational and postpartum weight management. The basic version of the Hope-D program will be considered ready for implementation in the subsequent intervention study once all sections of the System Usability Scale (SUS) reach a score above 68 within the same development period (sprint).

The SUS is a widely used, reliable, and valid instrument for evaluating the usability of various technologies, including digital products, systems, and services. It comprises ten statements rated on a five-point Likert scale, where 1 indicates strong disagreement and 5 indicates strong agreement. The total SUS score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better perceived usability. The SUS questionnaire has been translated into Finnish and is available for use free of charge.

1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Usability of gestational and postpartum digital pathway for weight management
Time Frame: 1 week
General technical questions will address the usability aspects and general thematic questions, e.g., motivation to manage weight during and after pregnancy with a digital pathway for weight management. Participants' responses will provide qualitative insights to guide the further development of the Hope-D program. The responses will not be quantitatively scored, as there are no right or wrong answers. Instead, the data will be analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Themes and issues that emerge most frequently across interviews will be considered the most relevant usability concerns and will be given higher priority in the development guidelines than those mentioned only occasionally.
1 week
Usability of gestational and postpartum general and individual weight management plan
Time Frame: one week

The general interview questions focus on the visibility and relevance of the weight management plan, the types of support perceived as motivational, clarity of goal-setting, and the appropriate timing for initiating and continuing weight management during pregnancy and in the postpartum period.

Participants' responses will inform the development of the Hope-D application. The data will be analyzed qualitatively; responses will not be scaled or scored, and there are no right or wrong answers. Recurring themes identified across multiple interviews will be considered indicative of common needs and prioritized accordingly in the development of the application guidelines. Themes mentioned in single interviews will also be noted but will receive lower priority in the guideline development process.

one week
Usability of group and individual coaching sessions
Time Frame: one week
The general interview questions explore whether group or individual coaching sessions add value to the digital pathway for weight management and general weight management plan. Themes include the perceived usefulness of coaching, optimal number and spacing of sessions, and the suitability of specific topics for either individual or group coaching formats. The answers of participants give investigators the guidelines for the development of Hope-D application. The answers themselves won't be scored; there aren't wrong or correct answers. Answers which repeat most commonly in the interviews are the most common issues and they will have higher priority in the guideline than answers which arise only in one interview.
one week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kaarin Mäkikallio, The wellbeing services county of Southwest Finland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 9, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

EU GDPR restricts data sharing

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Subscribe