- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07290738
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders
TMS for Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Xiaoming Du, PhD
- Phone Number: 443-882-9717
- Email: Xiaoming.Du@uth.tmc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Keiko Kunitoki
- Phone Number: (713) 486-2700
- Email: Keiko.Kunitoki@uth.tmc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- Recruiting
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-
Contact:
- Xiaoming Du, PhD
- Phone Number: 443-882-9717
- Email: Xiaoming.Du@uth.tmc.edu
-
Contact:
- Keiko Kunitoki
- Phone Number: (713) 486-2700
- Email: Keiko.Kunitoki@uth.tmc.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ability to give written informed consent
- Diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorder and Evaluation to Sign Consent (ESC) above 10.
- Is currently under the care of a licensed primary care provider or mental healthcare provider (e.g., psychiatrist, psychologist, nurse practitioner, licensed clinical social worker).
- Have negative symptoms as determined by BNSS score of 20 or more.
- Agrees to provide written permission, as requested, to allow any and all forms of communication between the investigators and study staff and any health care provider who currently provides and/or has provided service to the subject within two years of study enrollment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Persons with a first-degree relative with inherited epilepsy, seizure disorder, or seizures or persons who answer "yes" to any of the parts (A. - G.) of Question 3 of an epilepsy screening questionnaire.
- Taking > 400 mg clozapine/day and not on anti-seizure medication(s) with sufficient dose.
- Failed TMS screening questionnaire.
- Significant alcohol or other drug use (substance dependence within the recent months) or positive urine toxicology screen for substance not prescribed other than nicotine or marijuana dependence.
- Any major medical illnesses that may affect normal brain functioning. Examples of these conditions include, but not limited to, stroke, Central nervous System (CNS)infection or tumor, other significant brain neurological conditions.
- Cardiac pacemakers, implanted medication pumps, intracardiac lines, or acute, unstable cardiac disease, with intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head, excluding the mouth, that cannot be safely removed.
- History of head injury with loss of consciousness over 10 minutes; history of brain surgery
- 0 Cannot refrain from using alcohol and/or marijuana 24 hours or more prior to experiments.
- Woman who is pregnant (child-bearing potential but not on contraceptive and missing menstrual period; or by self-report; or by positive pregnancy test) or has had unprotected sexual intercourse without birth control in the last 4 weeks.
- Moderate-High Risk of suicide according to the Columbia - Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Screen Version - Recent (i.e. answers YES to Question 2 and NO to Question 6 (Moderate risk); or answers YES to Questions 3 (Moderate risk), 4, 5, or 6 (High risk) or in the clinical judgement of the investigator or the study psychiatrist.
- History (or family history) of deep vein thrombosis.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: AG TMS
|
A wire coil is held on the scalp.
Brief electrical currents are passed through the coil and create one or more magnetic pulses that stimulate the brain.
For each TMS session, bursts of 3 pulses at 50 Hz are repeated at 5 Hz as a train for 2seconds.
The inter-train interval is 8 seconds.
There are 20 trains lasting 192 seconds (600pulses) per session.
The intensity of TMS stimulations is set to 80-120% of resting motor threshold(RMT).
|
|
Sham Comparator: PFC sham
|
Participants will receive total of 2 s of theta burst sham stimulation (TBS) trains repeated every 10 s for a total of 20 cycles (600 pulses).
No actual magnetic stimulation will occur, still participant hears the TMS sound and a skin sensation
|
|
Sham Comparator: AG Sham
|
Participants will receive total of 2 s of theta burst sham stimulation (TBS) trains repeated every 10 s for a total of 20 cycles (600 pulses).
No actual magnetic stimulation will occur, still participant hears the TMS sound and a skin sensation
|
|
Active Comparator: PFC TMS
|
A wire coil is held on the scalp.
Brief electrical currents are passed through the coil and create one or more magnetic pulses that stimulate the brain.
For each TMS session, bursts of 3 pulses at 50 Hz are repeated at 5 Hz as a train for 2seconds.
The inter-train interval is 8 seconds.
There are 20 trains lasting 192 seconds (600pulses) per session.
The intensity of TMS stimulations is set to 80-120% of resting motor threshold(RMT).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Change in blood-brain barrier (BBB) water exchange rate at AG obtained from MRI scan
Time Frame: baseline (before treatment visit 1), midpoint (after treatment visit 10; about 2 weeks from baseline), and end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
baseline (before treatment visit 1), midpoint (after treatment visit 10; about 2 weeks from baseline), and end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Negative symptoms as assessed by the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS)
Time Frame: at baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
It includes 13 items across 6 domains: blunted affect, alogia, asociality, anhedonia, avolition, and lack of normal distress. Each item is scored from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severe negative symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 78. |
at baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
Change in Positive symptoms as assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Time Frame: at baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
It includes 30 items rated from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) across three subscales: Positive Symptoms (7 items; score range 7-49) Negative Symptoms (7 items; score range 7-49) General Psychopathology (16 items; score range 16-112) The PANSS Total Score ranges from 30 to 210, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Change |
at baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
Change in Cognitive function as assessed by Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS): Symbol Coding
Time Frame: t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
Participants are asked to match symbols to numbers according to a key as quickly and accurately as possible within 90 seconds.
Scores reflect the total number of correct responses, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance.
|
t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
Change in Working memory as assessed by the Number Span test
Time Frame: t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
The Number Span test evaluates working memory capacity by requiring participants to recall sequences of numbers in the same order (forward span) and/or reverse order (backward span).
Scores represent the total number of correctly recalled sequences, with higher scores indicating better working memory performance.
|
t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
Change in Working memory as assessed by the Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition (WMS-III): Spatial Span
Time Frame: t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
Participants observe a series of blocks tapped by the examiner and are asked to reproduce the sequence in the same order (Spatial Span Forward) and reverse order (Spatial Span Backward). Scores are based on the number of correctly reproduced sequences, with higher scores indicating better spatial working memory performance. |
t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
Change in Cognitive function as assessed by the Category Fluency Test: Animal naming (Fluency)
Time Frame: t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
participants are asked to name as many animals as possible within 60 seconds. The score is the total number of correct, non-repeated animal names, with higher scores indicating better semantic fluency. |
t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
Change in Cognitive function as assessed by the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test
Time Frame: t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
Participants are asked to copy a complex geometric figure and later reproduce it from memory after a delay. Scores are based on the accuracy and placement of figure components, with higher scores indicating better visuospatial and memory performance. |
t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
Change in Cognitive function as assessed by the Bell Lysaker Emotion Recognition Task
Time Frame: t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
Participants view brief video clips of an actor expressing various emotions (e.g., happiness, sadness, anger, fear, surprise, disgust, and neutrality) through facial expressions, vocal tone, and body language. Participants identify the emotion portrayed in each clip. Scores reflect the total number of correctly identified emotions, with higher scores indicating better emotion recognition ability. |
t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
Change in Cognitive function as assessed by the Hinting Task
Time Frame: t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
Participants read or listen to brief scenarios in which a character implies a desire or intention, and they must identify the underlying meaning. Scores reflect the total number of accurately interpreted hints, with higher scores indicating better theory of mind functioning. |
t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
Change in Depression as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
The PHQ-9 is a 9-item self-report questionnaire that measures depressive symptom severity over the past two weeks.
Each item is scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), yielding a total score range of 0-27, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.
|
t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
Change in Depression as assessed by the Calgary Depression Scale
Time Frame: t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
Total score of the Calgary Depression Scale will be reported and ranges from 0 to 27, with a higher score indicating greater depression.
|
t baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and at the end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
Change in Resting state functional connectivity between AG and PFC assessed by functional MRI (fMRI)
Time Frame: at baseline (before treatment visit 1), midpoint (after treatment visit 10; about 2 weeks from baseline), and end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
at baseline (before treatment visit 1), midpoint (after treatment visit 10; about 2 weeks from baseline), and end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
|
Change in Activity level (number of steps per day) as assessed by smart wristwatch
Time Frame: from baseline (before treatment visit 1) through end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
from baseline (before treatment visit 1) through end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
|
Change in Location (number of unique places visited)as assessed by smart wristwatch
Time Frame: from baseline (before treatment visit 1) through end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
from baseline (before treatment visit 1) through end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
|
Change in Sleep (number of hours slept per day) as assessed by smart wristwatch
Time Frame: from baseline (before treatment visit 1) through end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
from baseline (before treatment visit 1) through end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
|
Change in Speech (pitch, intonation, pause) as assessed by video recording of speech
Time Frame: baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
|
Change in facial expression (neutral, positive, and negative facial features) as assessed by video recording of speech
Time Frame: baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
baseline, after treatment visit 10 (about 2 weeks from baseline), and end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
|
Change in Electrophysiological responses as indicated by mismatch negativity as measured by electroencephalography (EEG)
Time Frame: baseline (before treatment visit 1) and end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
Mismatch negativity values will be reported in microvolts (uV).
Mismatch negativity is measured by subtracting the averaged response to a set of standard stimuli from the average response to deviant stimuli, and taking the amplitude of this difference in a given timepoint.
|
baseline (before treatment visit 1) and end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
|
Change in Electrophysiological response as indicated by steadystate auditory evoked responses from electroencephalography recording (EEG)
Time Frame: baseline (before treatment visit 1) and end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
Steady-state auditory evoked responses will be reported.
The responses are measured by calculating the ratio of the power at target frequency over power at the surrounding background frequencies.
The ration will be obtained in a given timepoint.
|
baseline (before treatment visit 1) and end of acute treatment (after treatment visit 20; about 4 weeks from baseline)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Xiaoming Du, PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-MS-25-0694
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceNot yet recruitingSchizophrenia Spectrum Disorder
-
University Hospital, RouenGroupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere; Centre Hospitalier du RouvrayNot yet recruitingAutism Spectrum Disorder | Schizophrenia Disorder
-
University of California, San DiegoNot yet recruitingSchizoaffecitve Disorder | SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
-
Ole Köhler-ForsbergAarhus University HospitalRecruiting
-
University of California, Los AngelesNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Recruiting
-
Elazığ Mental Health and Diseases HospitalCompleted
-
Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research HospitalCompletedSchizophrenia DisorderTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Värmland County Council, SwedenNot yet recruitingAutism Disorder | Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders
-
London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineAddis Ababa UniversityCompletedSchizophrenia | Schizoaffective Disorder | Schizophreniform Disorder | Schizophrenia Spectrum DisorderEthiopia
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...Not yet recruitingSchizophrenia Disorder
Clinical Trials on TMS
-
Hartford HospitalRecruiting
-
Carilion ClinicUnknown
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNot yet recruitingBinge-Eating Disorder
-
Emory UniversityCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedExecutive FunctionUnited States
-
Auburn UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Society of Addiction PsychologyRecruiting
-
Bayside HealthNational Health and Medical Research Council, AustraliaCompletedMajor Depressive DisorderAustralia
-
Bayside HealthCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier St AnneRecruitingTreatment Resistant SchizophreniaFrance
-
University of PennsylvaniaNot yet recruiting