Brazilian System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation CABG (BRASCORE CABG)

December 6, 2025 updated by: Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejia, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Estratificação de Risco em Cirurgia de revascularização miocárdica no Brasil: CABG - BraSCORE (Brazilian System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation)

Grouping relevant demographic and clinical information at specific stratified levels, and in correlation with the required resource sets, represents the possibility to adapt, improve, and innovate in cardiac surgery programs. In this path, the pursuit of implementing large databases for continuous improvement cycles becomes the foundation of the entire process. In Brazil, where structural and socioeconomic differences are significant, the standardization and sustainability of a large database become a major challenge. Projects like REPLICCAR (São Paulo Cardiovascular Surgery Registry) and BYPASS Registry, which were created to identify improvement opportunities, were temporary. The absence of a continuous multicenter registry makes it difficult to understand risk-adjusted patient outcomes and to implement cost-effective quality initiatives. For example, in 2022, the Ministry of Health launched the QualiSUS Cardio program, which began to consider hospital reimbursement not only in terms of surgical volume but also in relation to mortality, length of stay, and readmission rates after cardiac surgery. Changes like this already occur in various scenarios where payers, whether public or private, seek reimbursement through value-based models. However, for this to happen, the results need to be adjusted to patient risk. Otherwise, hospitals treating more severe patients would be at a disadvantage. This study aims to develop CABG-BraSCORE, a risk score to stratify patients referred for CABG surgery, adjusting outcomes to patient risk, and seeking continuous improvement for cardiac surgery programs in Brazil.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Detailed Description

Study Procedure: Data collection will be conducted from patient records, including demographic characteristics, preoperative status, surgical and postoperative data of CABG surgery, and follow-up up to 30 days post-discharge.

Centers with prospective data collection: Participants will be contacted 30 days after surgery and invited to participate in the study. The Free and Informed Consent Form (FICF) will be applied via telephone (Appendix 1). All FICF sessions will be recorded, downloaded, and stored according to the established study protocols.

Centers with retrospective data collection: Thirty days after surgery, it should be recorded whether there was a return visit to the outpatient clinic, readmission to the institution, the reason for readmission, such as surgical complications, stroke, surgical wound infection, myocardial infarction, and mortality at 30 days. All records should be consulted in the patient's medical record. If there is no information recorded about the patient's return visit, loss to follow-up should be considered. A loss of 20% was considered for the sample composition.

After the telephone FICF, a questionnaire (Appendix 2, within the Cardux platform's "Post-discharge Events" section) will be applied to gather information regarding readmissions, death, adverse events, among others, within 30 days after hospital discharge.

Patient data will be entered into the Cardux platform according to study protocol variables.

All inclusion steps will be guided by the coordinating center, providing clarification about the study protocol and ensuring its compliance, respecting the ethical and legal principles of the study.

  • Risks to Participants Participants will be exposed to minimal risk as this study will not involve interventions, only a single telephone interview. Therefore, no risks to participants are anticipated, as the data collection will be entirely retrospective and the consent forms will be stored confidentially.
  • Benefits to Participants: Participants will not receive any direct benefit from participating in this study. However, in the future, they might benefit from improved risk stratification for CABG surgeries, contributing to enhanced patient care and resource allocation.
  • Cardux Platform Cardux platform will be used for data management and analysis. This platform facilitates real-time monitoring and auditing of data, ensuring consistency and accuracy. The platform also supports predictive modeling and quality assessment.
  • Quality Audit of Records: To ensure data quality, a series of audits will be conducted. These audits will involve checking data completeness, consistency, and accuracy. Discrepancies will be resolved through communication with the participating centers.
  • Data analysis will include statistical methods to evaluate risk factors and develop the BraSCORE. The model's performance will be validated and compared with existing international risk scores (EuroSCORE III and STS)
  • Development of Machine Learning Algorithms Machine learning algorithms will be employed to develop predictive models for hospital mortality, readmission risk, and prolonged hospitalization.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 22240-002
        • Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia de Laranjeiras
      • São Paulo, Brazil, 01323-001
        • Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo
    • Ceará
      • Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
        • Hospital de Messejana
    • Paraíba
      • João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil, 58040-300
        • Hospital Alberto Urquiza Wanderley
    • São Paulo
      • São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 05403-900
        • USP Heart Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will consist of all consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG at the participating centers during the study period.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients submitted to isolated coronary artery bypass grafting at participating centers

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency or salvage CABG procedures.
  • Associated procedures (e.g., valve surgery, aortic surgery).
  • Missing mandatory data in the registry.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: up to 3 months during hospital admission for CABG
death occurring at any point during the hospitalization for surgery, even if after 30 days
up to 3 months during hospital admission for CABG
30-day mortality
Time Frame: 30-days of the procedure
death occurring after discharge from the hospital, but within 30-days of the procedure
30-days of the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prolonged Hospital Stay
Time Frame: postoperative hospital stay longer than 14 days
Postoperative hospital stay longer than 14 days, excluding in-hospital deaths
postoperative hospital stay longer than 14 days
30-day readmission
Time Frame: 30-days after surgery
any unplanned admission for any reason within 30-days of CABG surgery discharge
30-days after surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Data quality score
Time Frame: Assessment will be performed on registries that have completed a 30-day active data collection period.
Data quality will be assessed using a composite Aggregate Data Quality Score (ADQ), calculated as the average of three metrics: 1) Completeness (>70% threshold): the percentage of mandatory fields populated, calculated as (Total non-missing values / Total possible values); 2) Consistency (>90% threshold): the percentage of fields free from logical contradictions (ex.: discharge before admission) and format errors; and 3) Accuracy (>90% threshold): the percentage of fields correctly reflecting the source electronic health record, as verified by periodic in-loco audit. The ADQ provides a single summary measure of overall registry data reliability.
Assessment will be performed on registries that have completed a 30-day active data collection period.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 76508623.2.1001.0068
  • 7.933.450 (Registry Identifier: Ethical approval)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The Individual Participant Data (IPD) that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions imposed by the participating centers and the overseeing ethics committee (Comissão de Ética para Análise de Projetos de Pesquisa - CAPPesq). However, de-identified data may be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request, subject to approval by CAPPesq and the execution of a data sharing agreement.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on CABG-patients

Subscribe