Impact of Microneedling on the Gingival Tissue Surrounding Implant Supported Fixed Restoration.

December 7, 2025 updated by: Mona Al-Ahmady El-Meligy, Tanta University

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of microneedling with and without accelerated growth factor (AGF) injection on gingival tissue surrounding implant-supported fixed restorations. The peri-implant soft tissue phenotype is an important determinant of long-term implant stability and esthetic success. Patients with thin gingival biotype are more susceptible to mucosal recession, soft tissue transparency, and peri-implant complications. Enhancing gingival thickness and keratinized tissue width using minimally invasive methods can improve esthetic and biological outcomes.

Microneedling has recently been proposed as a simple and minimally invasive approach that stimulates local healing by inducing controlled micro-injury. It triggers angiogenesis and the release of intrinsic growth factors that promote soft tissue regeneration. Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) is an autologous platelet concentrate obtained through a single-step centrifugation technique. It contains a high concentration of platelet-derived and vascular growth factors that enhance tissue repair and collagen synthesis. Combining microneedling with AGF may therefore produce synergistic effects, improving the soft tissue phenotype and peri-implant mucosal stability.

The study will include 20 participants aged 18-34 years with thin gingival biotype (0.8-1 mm) around maxillary anterior implants. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:

  1. AGF group: AGF injection alone.
  2. Microneedling + AGF group: Microneedling using sterile disposable lancets until pinpoint bleeding occurs, followed by AGF injection (0.2-0.3 mL per site).

Clinical parameters including gingival thickness (GT), keratinized tissue width (KTW), probing depth (PD), and bleeding index (BI) will be recorded at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. All participants will receive standardized zirconia restorations following osseointegration. Statistical analysis will include intra- and inter-group comparisons, with significance set at p < 0.05.

The study is expected to clarify whether combining microneedling with AGF enhances peri-implant soft tissue thickness more effectively than AGF alone. If successful, this combined minimally invasive approach may offer a practical and biologically based technique to improve soft tissue health and esthetics around dental implants.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The peri-implant mucosa plays a crucial role in the biological and esthetic stability of dental implants. A thin gingival biotype is often associated with soft tissue recession, marginal bone loss, and esthetic compromise. Conventional augmentation techniques such as connective tissue grafting are effective but involve additional morbidity, donor site discomfort, and variable esthetic results. This study investigates a minimally invasive approach combining microneedling and accelerated growth factor (AGF) injection to enhance the gingival tissue phenotype around implant-supported restorations.

Microneedling is based on creating controlled micro-perforations in the soft tissue surface using fine needles. These micro-injuries induce a natural wound healing cascade that includes platelet activation, release of endogenous growth factors, angiogenesis, and fibroblast stimulation. The process enhances collagen deposition and epithelial thickening, which may increase the overall gingival thickness and keratinized tissue width.

AGF is an autologous blood-derived product obtained by a standardized single-step centrifugation technique that separates platelet-rich fractions containing high levels of biologically active molecules such as PDGF, VEGF, and TGF-β. These factors promote tissue regeneration and accelerate wound healing. Injecting AGF into peri-implant mucosa provides a reservoir of growth factors that stimulate fibroblast activity, improve tissue vascularity, and enhance collagen formation.

The hypothesis of this trial is that combining microneedling with AGF will yield superior soft tissue enhancement compared to AGF alone.

Study Design

This is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, parallel-arm interventional clinical trial. 20 sites for patients aged 18-34 years with thin gingival biotype (0.8-1mm) in the maxillary anterior region will be included. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups using a computer-generated random sequence:

  1. AGF Group: AGF injection only.
  2. Microneedling + AGF Group: Microneedling using sterile disposable lancets until pinpoint bleeding occurs, immediately followed by AGF injection (0.2-0.3 mL per site).

Methodology

The study follows five sequential phases:

  1. Pre-surgical Phase: Clinical and radiographic evaluation, oral hygiene instructions, baseline measurement of GT, KTW, PD, and BI.
  2. Surgical Phase: Implant placement in the maxillary anterior region followed by 3-4 months of osseointegration.
  3. Intervention Phase: Randomized treatment application after healing.
  4. Restorative Phase: Fabrication and cementation of standardized zirconia crowns.
  5. Follow-up Phase: Assessment of all parameters at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Outcome Measures

    • Primary Outcome: Gingival thickness (GT) at baseline, 3, and 6 months.
    • Secondary Outcomes: Keratinized tissue width (KTW), probing depth (PD), and bleeding index (BI).

Statistical Analysis Data will be analyzed using SPSS software (IBM). Paired and unpaired t-tests will compare intra- and inter-group differences. The significance level will be set at p < 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gharbia Governorate
      • Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt, 31527
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18-34 years
  • Thin gingival biotype ( 0.8- 1mm GT at maxillary anterior teeth)
  • Non-smokers
  • Plaque index (PI) score 0-1
  • No bleeding on probing
  • No malocclusion or crowding affecting implant site

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active orthodontic treatment
  • Previous periodontal surgery at study sites
  • Systemic diseases affecting healing
  • Use of anticoagulants or drugs causing gingival enlargement
  • Mucogingival stress or bruxism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) Injection Only
Participants in this arm received autologous Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) injection alone into the peri-implant mucosa (0.2-0.3 mL per site) in the maxillary anterior region, without prior microneedling. The AGF was prepared from 10 mL of venous blood via a standardized single-step centrifugation procedure to obtain a growth factor-rich fraction. Gingival thickness and soft tissue parameters were evaluated using the same intraoral scanner and transgingival file method at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Participants in this arm received autologous Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) injection alone into the peri-implant mucosa (0.2-0.3 mL per site) in the maxillary anterior region, without prior microneedling. The AGF was prepared from 10 mL of venous blood via a standardized single-step centrifugation procedure to obtain a growth factor-rich fraction. Gingival thickness and soft tissue parameters were evaluated using the same intraoral scanner and transgingival file method at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Experimental: Microneedling Combined with Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF)
Participants in this arm received microneedling around the peri-implant mucosa in the maxillary anterior region using sterile disposable glucometer lancets under aseptic conditions. Repeated micro-perforations were created circumferentially until pinpoint bleeding appeared. Immediately afterward, autologous Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) was injected (0.2-0.3 mL per site) into the treated mucosa. AGF was prepared from 10 mL of venous blood using a single-step centrifugation protocol to isolate the growth factor-rich fraction. Gingival thickness and soft tissue parameters were assessed using an intraoral scanner combined with a transgingival file measurement technique at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.
Participants in this arm received microneedling around the peri-implant mucosa in the maxillary anterior region using sterile disposable glucometer lancets under aseptic conditions. Repeated micro-perforations were created circumferentially until pinpoint bleeding appeared. Immediately afterward, autologous Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) was injected (0.2-0.3 mL per site) into the treated mucosa. AGF was prepared from 10 mL of venous blood using a single-step centrifugation protocol to isolate the growth factor-rich fraction. Gingival thickness and soft tissue parameters were assessed using an intraoral scanner combined with a transgingival file measurement technique at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gingival thickness (GT)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after intervention

Gingival thickness will be measured to assess the effect of accelerated growth factor injection with and without microneedling on peri-implant soft tissue phenotype.

Measurements will be taken at the mid-facial point of the implant site using a transgingival file technique combined with digital evaluation via intraoral scanning to ensure accuracy and reproducibility.

Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Doaa M Elgendy, lecturer, Lecturer of prosthodontics, faculty of dentistry, Tanta university, Egypt.
  • Principal Investigator: Shimaa M Eltantawy, lecturer, Lecturer of fixed prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Egypt
  • Study Director: Ahmed A Mosleh, lecturer, Lecturer of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Egypt

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 10, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 5, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Implants

Clinical Trials on Accelerated Growth Factor (AGF) Injection Only

Subscribe