Prehabilitation of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Physical Prehabilitation of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

This prospective prehabilitation study aims to evaluate the effects of an individualized exercise program initiated before breast cancer surgery and continued for 12 months postoperatively. The intervention focuses on incidence of breast cancer-related lymphedema, improving functional outcomes, range of motion, pain, and patient-reported measures throughout the surgical and recovery phases. Participants receive structured, personalized exercise instructions and are monitored regularly during follow-up.

The study assesses the trajectory of extremity volume difference, early postoperative pain, the recovery pattern of shoulder range of motion and changes in functional status across the first postoperative year. Additionally, it examines the incidence of lymphedema and explores demographic and clinical determinants affecting patient outcomes. The findings are expected to provide evidence for the integration of prehabilitation into standard breast cancer care pathways.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This prospective prehabilitation study investigates the effectiveness of an individualized exercise program initiated before breast cancer surgery and radiation therapy maintained for 12 months postoperatively. The intervention was designed to optimize physical readiness for surgery, support early postoperative recovery, and promote long-term functional improvement. Participants received structured exercise instructions delivered through visual and written materials, and adherence was reinforced through regular follow-up contacts.

The primary focus of the study is to characterize postoperative functional trajectories, including pain intensity, shoulder range of motion (ROM), upper-extremity function, and patient-reported outcomes. Particular emphasis is placed on the early postoperative period, during which pain typically increases and functional limitations become more pronounced. Longitudinal assessments allow observation of recovery patterns across all ROM planes, with anticipated improvements in flexion and abduction by the third postoperative month and further recovery in internal and external rotation by the sixth month.

A secondary objective is to monitor the development of lymphedema, defined by limb volume differences and physical signs of edema. The study also explores demographic and clinical determinants that may influence treatment outcomes, aiming to identify subgroups that benefit most from prehabilitation. By evaluating functional, symptomatic, and quality-of-life outcomes across a 12-month period, this study provides evidence to support the incorporation of preoperative exercise interventions into standard breast cancer care pathways.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Balıkesir, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • UHS Balikesir Ataturk Health and Application Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women aged 18 years or older
  • Diagnosed with breast cancer and scheduled for surgical treatment
  • Able to perform prescribed upper-extremity exercises
  • Able to provide informed consent and complete follow-up assessments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of metastatic disease at baseline
  • Neurological, orthopedic, or systemic conditions limiting upper-extremity mobility
  • Prior breast or axillary surgery on the same side
  • Planned neoadjuvant chemotherapy that would delay the initiation of the exercise program
  • Inability to comply with the exercise instruction or follow-up schedule

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Prehabilitation Exercise Group
Behavioral Intervention
A personalized upper-extremity exercise program initiated before surgery and continued for 12 months postoperatively. The program includes mobility, stretching, strengthening, and functional exercises tailored to individual needs. Instruction is provided through written and visual materials, with follow-up contacts to reinforce adherence.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Lymphedema Development
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively

Lymphedema is determined by volume differences between extremities and physical signs of edema.

Physical examination consists of inspection of the patient for swelling, rash, dermal ulcerations, hyperkeratosis, vascular signs continuing with palpation for pitting and Stemmer's sign. Limb circumferences were measured using a constant-tension tape beginning from the ulnar styloid process in the upper extremity with 4 cm intervals up to 32 cm. Afterwards limb volume was estimated via calculator model.

Calculation results are compared by opposite limb and volume difference of 200 ml or 5-10% is considered as Lymphedema. Clinical severity was graded according to the International Society of Lymphology (ISL) staging system (Stages 0-III), based on presence of swelling, reversibility, pitting, and tissue fibrosis.

Baseline; 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures pain intensity. The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be'). It is performed by asking the patient to rate their current level of pain by placing a mark on the line.
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Quality of Life Impairment
Time Frame: Baseline; 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively

Quality of life is assessed with standardized patient-reported questionnaires. The EORTC Core Quality of Life(QoL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is designed to measure cancer patients' physical, psychological and social functions. The questionnaire is composed of multi-item scales and single items.

EORTC-QLQ-C30 gives information about how affected the patients are about physical, emotional, social and financial aspects because of the disease and treatments. Form includes twenty-eight questions answered as from one to four Likert scale, reflecting grades of agree to disagree respectively. Final two questions necessitate giving value on a seven point scale, to the quality of life and global health of the last week. Global health score and physical functioning score reflects better QoL in higher values while symptom scale results worser in high values.

Baseline; 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Upper Extremity Function
Time Frame: Baseline; 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Upper extremity functional index-15 (UEFI-15) iss used to assess the functional status of the upper extremity by 15-items based on activities of daily living. Sum of the item scores are converted to final score between 0-100 points means the higher score is better functional capacity.
Baseline; 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively
Exercise Adherence
Time Frame: Throughout the 12-month follow-up
Compliance with the prescribed home-based exercise program is questioned if they are performing the exercises properly according to the template they are given at every visit with physician and overlooked if patient requires. Percentage of patients performing regular exercise will be interpreted after 12-months follow-up.
Throughout the 12-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 5, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

October 5, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic

Clinical Trials on Prehabilitation Exercise Group

Subscribe