Feasibility of Group-Based Metacognitive Therapy for PTSD

December 10, 2025 updated by: Maria Bragesjo, Karolinska Institutet

A Feasibility Study of Group-Based Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in a Routine Healthcare Setting

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of group-based Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) when delivered within routine psychiatric care in Sweden.

The secondary objective is to evaluate preliminary treatment effects of group-based MCT on symptoms of post-traumatic stress, complex PTSD, depression, and quality of life, and to compare treatment dropout rates to those reported in the existing literature on exposure-based treatments for PTSD.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The investigators will investigate a 14 weekly group-based Metacognitive Therapy (MCT) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Feasibility and acceptability outcomes include recruitment and retention rates, data completeness, treatment adherence, and qualitative evaluations of patient experiences. Recruitment is designed to be broadly inclusive with minimal exclusion criteria. Patients will be recruited from a psychiatric clinic specialised in PTSD in Stockholm, Sweden. The investigators hypothesize that group-based MCT will result in significant within-group reductions in PTSD and depressive symptoms and improvements in functioning and quality of life from pre- to post-treatment, with effects maintained up to the 6-month follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden, 14157
        • Recruiting
        • Affektiva, ångest och traumaprogrammet, Psykiatri Sydväst
        • Contact:
          • Maria Bragesjö, PhD and licensed psychologist
          • Phone Number: 0046 8585 804 45
          • Email: maria.bragesjo@ki.se

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fulfills the diagnostic criteria for PTSD based on clinical records
  • Self-rated total sum score over 30 on the PCL-5
  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Stable psychotropic medication regimen for ≥4 weeks.
  • Fluent in Swedish.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe psychiatric comorbidities (e.g., suicidal ideation, active psychosis, bipolar disorder) warranting immediate attention.
  • Current trauma-related threat (e.g., ongoing domestic violence).
  • Ongoing evidence-based trauma-focused psychological treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group-based metacognitive therapy
14 weeks of group-based meta-cognitive therapy
Group-based metacognitive therapy will be offered for 14 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of participants that conducts the weekly measures and further assessment points
Time Frame: Through study completion up to the 6 months follow up
The proportion of participants that conducts the weekly measures and further assessment points
Through study completion up to the 6 months follow up
The proportion of participants that go through the entire treatment period
Time Frame: Completion of treatment period, up to the last session delivered 14 weeks after treatment start
The proportion of participants that go through the entire treatment period
Completion of treatment period, up to the last session delivered 14 weeks after treatment start
Adverse events related to the treatment
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to the 6 months follow up
Adverse events related to the treatment
Through study completion, up to the 6 months follow up
Acceptability
Time Frame: Completion of treatment period, up to the last session delivered 14 weeks after treatment start
Number of drop-outs from treatment
Completion of treatment period, up to the last session delivered 14 weeks after treatment start
Treatment acceptability
Time Frame: Baseline
Number of individuals offered the intervention but declined part of treatment
Baseline
Treatment acceptability
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after treatment completion
Participants experience/satisfaction with treatment and assessment procedures through qualitative interviews
Up to 6 months after treatment completion
Participants satisfaction with treatment, assessed by The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8).
Time Frame: Up till treatment completion, 14 weeks after treatment start
The CSQ-8 yields a single score measuring a single dimension of overall satisfaction. An "overall score" is calculated by summing the score on each of the eight scale item. Scores range from 8 to 32, with higher values indicating higher satisfaction.
Up till treatment completion, 14 weeks after treatment start
Treatment adherence
Time Frame: Up to treatment completion, 14 weeks after treatment start.
The proportion of completed group-sessions
Up to treatment completion, 14 weeks after treatment start.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in PTSD symptoms as assessed by the PTSD Check List - DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: At baseline, after seven weeks of treatment, immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.
The PCL-5 is a 20-item self-report measure based upon the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) criteria for PTSD. Total Score (Range 0-80 with higher scores representing more PTSD symptoms.
At baseline, after seven weeks of treatment, immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.
Change in ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD symptoms as assessed by the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ).
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.
The ITQ includes six items measuring each PTSD symptom cluster and these items measure how bothersome each symptom has been in the past month. The ITQ also includes six items measuring each 'Disturbance in Self-Organization' (DSO) symptom in complex PTSD. These items measure how a respondent typically feels, thinks about oneself, and relates to others. The PTSD and DSO symptoms are accompanied by three items measuring associated functional impairments in the domains of social, occupation, and other important areas of life. All items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Extremely). Thus, PTSD and DSO symptom scores range from 0 to 24 and CPTSD symptom scores range from 0 to 48. Higher scores represents more PTSD and complex PTSD symptoms.
At baseline, immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.
Change in depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.
The PHQ-9 is a widely used and well-validated instrument for measuring the severity of depressive symptoms. Scores are calculated based on how frequently a person experiences 9 symptoms of depression ranging from "not at all" response is scored as 0; "several days" response is 1; "more than half the days" response is 2; and "nearly every day" response is 3. Higher scores represents more depressive symptoms.
At baseline, immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.
Change in quality of life measured by Euroqol, EQ-5D
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.
Change in overall health from baseline to post treatment and follow up . EQ-5D is a standardized self-report measure of overall health status measured in terms of five dimensions; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Mobility dimension asks about the person's walking ability. Self-care dimension asks about the ability to wash or dress by oneself, and usual activities dimension measures performance in "work, study, housework, family or leisure activities". In pain/discomfort dimension, it asks how much pain or discomfort they have, and in anxiety/depression dimension, it asks how anxious or depressed they are. The respondents self-rate their level of severity for each dimension using a three-level scale: 1 having no problems, 2 having some problems and 3 having extreme problems. A higher score indicate worse severity.
At baseline, immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.
Change in tendency to engage in excessive, uncontrollable, and generalized worry measured by PSWQ
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.

Change in tendency to engage in excessive and uncontrollable worry from baseline to post-treatment and follow-up.

The Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) is a standardized self-report measure assessing the general tendency to experience persistent, excessive, and uncontrollable worry. It measures the extent to which worry is perceived as pervasive, distressing, and difficult to control across situations. The scale consists of 16 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("not at all typical of me") to 5 ("very typical of me"). Items reflect frequency, intensity, and uncontrollability of worry. Higher scores indicate a greater tendency toward pathological worry.

At baseline, immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.
Change in general anxiety level measured by GAD-7
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.
Change in The Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), a standardized self-report measure of general anxiety symptoms. It consists of 7 items assessing the frequency of core anxiety symptoms such as excessive worry, tension, restlessness, irritability, and difficulties relaxing or concentrating. Respondents rate how often they have been bothered by each symptom over the past two weeks on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.
At baseline, immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.
Adverse events related to treatment measured by the Negative effects questionnaire-20.
Time Frame: Immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.
Self-rated questionnaire on negative effects. It contains 20 items that are scored on a five point Likert-scale (0-4) and differentiates between negative effects that are attributed to treatment and those possibly caused by other circumstances. The total score of the NEQ ranges from 0 to 80 points, a higher score reflects more negative effects.
Immediately after treatment completion, at 3-month and 6-months follow up after treatment completion.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dropout Rates
Time Frame: Immediately after treatment completion
Drop out rates will be compared with published data on trauma-focused CBT and EMDR for PTSD.
Immediately after treatment completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 28, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 28, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025-03111-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on PTSD

Clinical Trials on Group-based metacognitive therapy

Subscribe