Effect of Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA) on Postoperative Pain and Perioperative Nausea and Vomiting in Elective Laparoscopic . (OFA)

December 13, 2025 updated by: Galal Eldeen Hasan Hasan Hussein, Assiut University

Effect of Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA) on Postoperative Pain and Perioperative Nausea and Vomiting in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

  1. To evaluate the efficacy of a standardized multimodal Opioid Sparing (OS) protocol versus conventional opioid-based analgesia in reducing acute postoperative
  2. To quantify opioid consumption reduction achievable through OS strategies
  3. To assess the impact of OS on hemodynamic parameters during critical surgical phases
  4. To compare recovery metrics (PONV, bowel function, ambulation)
  5. To evaluate the safety profile of OS anesthesia

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The ongoing opioid crisis represents a significant public health challenge, with surgical prescriptions being a major contributor to chronic opioid use and misuse. Recent epidemiological data indicate that 4-6% of opioid- naïve patients develop persistent opioid use postoperatively, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients being particularly vulnerable due to moderate postoperative pain . Despite being a minimally invasive procedure, laparoscopic cholecystectomy consistently ranks among the most common general surgical procedures worldwide, with over 1 million performed annually in the United States alone. This frequency amplifies the population-level impact of postoperative prescribing patterns . Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of individual components-dexmedetomidine for hemodynamic stabilization, lidocaine infusions for visceral analgesia, and regional techniques like erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks-but their synergistic effects remain underexplored . A recent scoping review highlighted that while opioid-sparing (OS) effects are frequently reported, evidence for clinically meaningful outcomes (e.g., reduced ventilation time, accelerated functional recovery) remains limited . The pathophysiology of post-cholecystectomy pain involves both somatic (abdominal wall) and visceral (diaphragmatic irritation, biliary spasm) components, necessitating a multimodal approach. Opioids inadequately address inflammatory mediators while introducing risks of respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), ileus, and hemodynamic instability. Emerging evidence suggests that α-2 agonists (e.g., dexmedetomidine) and NMDA ant

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Mohamed Bakr Eid, prof
  • Phone Number: +2 01223213370
  • Email: bakr@aun.edu.eg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 to 60 years scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Elective must be included in title.
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I or II.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) < 35 kg/m².

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic opioid use (>30 MME/day for >3 months).
  • Contraindications to study medications (e.g., severe hepatic impairment; allergy/contraindication to lidocaine, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, fentanyl, or NSAIDs).
  • Renal dysfunction (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m²).
  • Significant cardiac conduction abnormalities.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Emergency surgery or conversion to open cholecystectomy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: OpioidSparingGroup OS)
Maintenance Dexmedetomidine 0.2-0.5 µg/kg/h + Lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg/h + Magnesium 10 mg/kg/h; Sevoflurane as required; Atracurium 0.1 mg/kg IV PRN
Other Names:
  • Lidocaine
  • Magnesium
  • Dexmedetomidine
Active Comparator: ControlGroup (CG)
Maintenance Dexmedetomidine 0.2-0.5 µg/kg/h + Lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg/h + Magnesium 10 mg/kg/h; Sevoflurane as required; Atracurium 0.1 mg/kg IV PRN
Other Names:
  • Lidocaine
  • Magnesium
  • Dexmedetomidine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity at rest postoperatively (Visual Analog Scale, VAS, 0-10)
Time Frame: 48 hours post operative
Pain intensity at rest will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate worse pain.
48 hours post operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cumulative opioid use (MME)
Time Frame: 48 hours post operative
Cumulative opioid consumption will be measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) administered to each patient.
48 hours post operative
Time to extubating
Time Frame: 24 hours post operative
Time to extubating; time to Aldrete ≥9
24 hours post operative
Time to first rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours post operative
time to first demand for rescue analgesia
24 hours post operative
Bowel recovery (first flatus)
Time Frame: 48 hours post operative
Time in hours from completion of surgery until the patient passes first flatus, representing bowel recovery.
48 hours post operative
Ambulation tolerance
Time Frame: 48 hours post operative
Assessment of the patient's ability to ambulate, measured as distance walked in feet or meters within specified postoperative periods.
48 hours post operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Clinical Trials on opoid free anesthesia

Subscribe