Lung EIT Image Guide Ventilation in ARDS

December 16, 2025 updated by: Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Personalised EIT-guided Ventilation Strategy Versus Conventional Protective Ventilation Strategy in ARDS Patients: a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled triaL

The goal of this multi-center randomized controlled clinical trial is to learn if an individualized, bedside electrical impedance tomography (EIT)-guided ventilation strategy (including EIT-guided prone positioning and PEEP titration) can improve outcomes compared with a conventional lung-protective ventilation strategy in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the individualized EIT-guided ventilation strategy reduce 28-day mortality in ARDS patients? Researchers will compare the EIT-guided intervention arm to a control arm receiving routine lung-protective ventilation (without bedside EIT guidance) to see if the EIT-guided approach lowers 28-day mortality and improves other clinical outcomes.

Adult ARDS patients who meet inclusion criteria will be assigned to EIT-guided group and control group through stratified randomization:

EIT-guided group: Undergo bedside EIT assessments using a China-manufactured EIT device to guide decisions about prone positioning and individualized PEEP titration (including a recruitment maneuver).

Control group: Receive PEEP setting per conventional PEEP-FiO₂ tables and prone positioning per standard clinical indications without EIT guidance.

Both groups: Receive standard supportive ICU care and routine outcome assessments at multiple time points.

Primary outcome: 28-day mortality. Other outcomes include ventilator-free days to day 28 and so on.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

574

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100730
        • Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with ARDS receiving mechanical ventilation who meet the following diagnostic criteria:

    1. Triggered by acute risk factors such as pneumonia, non-pulmonary infection, trauma, transfusion, aspiration, or shock. Pulmonary edema is not entirely or predominantly attributable to cardiogenic causes or fluid overload, and hypoxemia/gas exchange impairment is not mainly due to atelectasis. However, ARDS can be diagnosed in the presence of these conditions if predisposing risk factors exist.
    2. Acute onset or worsening of hypoxemic respiratory failure within 1 week of the identified risk factor or onset of new or worsening respiratory symptoms.
    3. Bilateral opacities on chest radiograph or CT, or bilateral B-lines and/or consolidation on ultrasound, not fully explained by effusion, atelectasis, or nodules/masses.
    4. PaO₂/FiO₂ ≤ 300 mm Hg or SpO₂/FiO₂ ≤ 315 (if SpO₂ ≤ 97%).
  • ARDS onset within 1 week.
  • Mechanical ventilation ≤ 72 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Contraindications to EIT application (e.g., local skin lesions, cardiac pacemaker).
  • Contraindications to prone positioning (e.g., increased intracranial pressure, intra-abdominal hypertension, spinal fractures).
  • Evidence of barotrauma such as pneumothorax, mediastinal emphysema, or subcutaneous emphysema.
  • End-stage disease.
  • Informed consent not signed by legal guardians or family.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EIT-guided group
Prone positioning and PEEP titration guided by China-manufactured EIT.
The EIT-guided group, will receive recruitment maneuver and PEEP titration guided by EIT to determine the optimal PEEP level.
The EIT-guided group, will determine prone positioning therapy based on EIT.
Active Comparator: Control group
PEEP set guided by conventional PEEP-FiO₂ table and prone positioning guided by routine clinical indications without EIT guidance.
The control group will receive routine ventilation strategy. Routine recruitment maneuver is not recommended but may be used as rescue therapy. PEEP is set using the conventional PEEP-FiO₂ table.
The control group will determine prone positioning therapy based on routine practice.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
28-day mortality
Time Frame: Day 28 after randomization
The survival status on the 28th day after randomization
Day 28 after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ventilator-free days within 28 days after randomization
Time Frame: within 28 days after randomization
Ventilator-free days within 28 days after randomization
within 28 days after randomization
Ventilator-free days within 14 days after randomization
Time Frame: Within 14 days after randomization
Ventilator-free days within 14 days after randomization
Within 14 days after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Huaiwu He, MD, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 20, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)

Clinical Trials on Recruitment maneuver and PEEP setting guided by EIT

Subscribe