- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07340073
Coordinated Reset Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease (CR DBS PD)
May 18, 2026 updated by: University of Minnesota
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a surgical implant procedure for the treatment of Parkinson's Disease (PD) utilizing medical devices approved by the FDA.
A novel approach to current DBS approaches is called "Coordinated Reset" DBS (CR-DBS) which uses different patterns of stimulation at lower currents and can address the limitations of traditional DBS (T-DBS) that uses continuous high amplitude and high frequency stimulation.
This study will evaluate the safety and short-term efficacy of CR-DBS in PD.
The results from this study will significantly advance the development of CR-DBS for the treatment of PD.
Findings in this study will also provide the rationale for further development of this novel DBS approach for other neurological and psychiatric disorders.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
24
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Marina Bryants, CCRP, BS
- Phone Number: 612-624-3035
- Email: bryan371@umn.edu
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease
- Minimum age of 21 years old
- Will be or has been implanted with the Boston Scientific Vercise Genus Rechargeable DBS system
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of musculoskeletal disorders that affect movement of the limbs/gait
- Other significant neurological disorder
- Significant psychiatric disorder
- History of dementia or cognitive impairment that precludes them from getting DBS surgery or per study staff judgment, MacCAT-CR assessment does not deduce that the participant has capacity to consent
- Other significant medical disorder that could impede study participation
- Pregnant women
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: CR-DBS
Randomized to either T-DBS occurring first or CR-DBS occurring first (50/50 chance of being assigned to either, but will be assessing both)
|
Deep Brain Stimulation
|
|
Active Comparator: T-DBS
Randomized to either T-DBS occurring first or CR-DBS occurring first (50/50 chance of being assigned to either, but will be assessing both)
|
Deep Brain Stimulation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
The MDS-UPDRS is a standard rating scale for PD that has been widely used in clinical settings and PD research.
It utilizes a 4-subscale structure and 5-point (Normal = 0 to Severe = 4) severity scale.
Part III of the Scale assesses the motor signs of PD through 18 items, with a maximum possible score of 72.
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency and Severity of Bradykinesia, Dyskinesia, Tremor, Sleep Quality and Fragmentation Scores Measured via KinetiGraph.
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
The KinetiGraph PKG system consists of a small watch-device worn on the wrist for collecting data over a period of several days and provides a report that shows how motor symptoms and complications of PD such as bradykinesia, tremor and dyskinesias vary throughout the day.
The watch will be worn on the patient's most affected side (indicated by each patient's MDS-UPDRS III scores for two body sides).
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Amplitude Decrement via Rapid Alternating Movements (RAMs)
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
This task assesses hypokinesia and the sequence effect (deterioration of movement amplitude over time).
Pronation-supination movements will be performed using a forearm manipulandum.
Movement will be visually guided and acoustically paced.
Four 60-second trials will be completed each side (right and left arms), with each trial including 4 transitions in movement rate (1.0 or 1.75 Hz).
Delsys inertial measurement units (IMUs) will also be used during this task to measure EMG and kinematic data.
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Forearm Rigidity
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
Forearm rigidity will be assessed using a custom-built robotic manipulandum which provides reliable and objective measures of resistance to imposed motion.
The device passively imposes sinusoidal movements of the forearm about the pronation-supination axis through a ± 40° range of motion at 1.5 Hz while measuring the angular displacement and resistive torque required to move the limb.
Trials will be collected separately for the right and left arms, with or without an activation maneuver (tapping the contralateral hand on the leg), a technique that is used clinically to elicit or enhance rigidity.
Delsys inertial measurement units (IMUs) will be used to measure the EMG activities of biceps brachii and pronator teres muscles, as secondary measurements during the task.
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Cognitive Measurements (TMT-B)
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
Trail Making Task-B will evaluate visual scanning, sequencing, cognitive flexibility and processing speed will be completed.
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Verbal Fluency Measurement (DKEFS)
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
DKEFS Verbal Fluency Task will evaluate verbal fluency.
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Working Memory Assessment via N-Back Task
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
Quantitative assessment of accuracy and reaction time as a function of working memory load.
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Dyskinesia Assessment via Rush Dyskinesia Rating Scale (RDRS)
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
RDRS will assess the severity of overall dyskinesias during activities of daily living.
A severity rating score of 4 indicates violent dyskinesia and 0 indicates an absence of dyskinesia.
This scale can also distinguish chorea from dystonia (the two major types of dyskinesias in PD) and identify the single most disabling form of dyskinesia.
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Frequency of participants with adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v6.0
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
Frequency [between and within] participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v6.0.
This is a qualitative collection of information via participant report or clinical observation, but will be input as quantitative (e.g., a headache can be classified as "1-Mild, 2-Moderate, and 3-Severe).
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Step Length ("Steady-State Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
In this gait task, spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest (repeated 5x)
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Gait Speed ("Steady-State Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
In this gait task, spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest (repeated 5x)
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Cadence ("Steady-State Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
In this gait task, spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest (repeated 5x)
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Step Variability ("Steady-State Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
In this gait task, spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest (repeated 5x)
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Step Asymmetry ("Steady-State Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
In this gait task, spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest (repeated 5x)
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Swing Time Variability ("Steady-State Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
In this gait task, spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest (repeated 5x)
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Frequency of Freezing of Gait ("Steady-State Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
In this gait task, spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest (repeated 5x)
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Duration of Freezing of Gait ("Steady-State Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
In this gait task, spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest (repeated 5x)
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Difference in Step Length (w/ and w/o 1-Back; "Dual-Task Effect on Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
The dual-task effect on gait will be assessed by repeating the gait task; spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest while the patient performs a 1-back cognitive task.
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Difference in Gait Speed (w/ and w/o 1-Back; "Dual-Task Effect on Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
The dual-task effect on gait will be assessed by repeating the gait task; spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest while the patient performs a 1-back cognitive task.
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Difference in Cadence (w/ and w/o 1-Back; "Dual-Task Effect on Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
The dual-task effect on gait will be assessed by repeating the gait task; spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest while the patient performs a 1-back cognitive task.
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Difference in Step Variability (w/ and w/o 1-Back; "Dual-Task Effect on Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
The dual-task effect on gait will be assessed by repeating the gait task; spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest while the patient performs a 1-back cognitive task.
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Difference in Step Asymmetry (w/ and w/o 1-Back; "Dual-Task Effect on Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
The dual-task effect on gait will be assessed by repeating the gait task; spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest while the patient performs a 1-back cognitive task.
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
|
Difference in Swing Time Variability (w/ and w/o 1-Back; "Dual-Task Effect on Gait")
Time Frame: Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
The dual-task effect on gait will be assessed by repeating the gait task; spatial and temporal gait metrics will be obtained using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the feet, wrists, lumbar, and sternum.
Patients will walk for ~1 minute, back and forth along a ~12m walkway, followed by ~1 minute of rest while the patient performs a 1-back cognitive task.
|
Through participant study completion, an average of two months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jing Wang, PhD, University of Minnesota
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2031
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2031
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 13, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 5, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
January 14, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 20, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 18, 2026
Last Verified
May 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NEUR-2025-34279
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Deep Brain Stimulation
-
Rabin Medical CenterCompleted
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier St AnneRecruitingPathology Requiring Deep Brain Stimulation TherapyFrance
-
Surgical Information Sciences Inc.Terminated
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity of TwenteRecruitingParkinson's Disease | Deep Brain StimulationGermany
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical...RecruitingDeep Brain Stimulation | Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeChina
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity of Oxford; University of TwenteRecruitingDeep Brain Stimulation | Parkinson's Disease (PD)Germany
-
Ankara UniversityRecruitingParkinson Disease | Deep Brain Stimulation | Deep Brain Stimulation SurgeryTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of VirginiaUnknownDeep Brain Stimulation | High Intensity Focused UltrasoundUnited States
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingRecruitingDrug Resistant Epilepsy | Deep Brain StimulationChina
Clinical Trials on DBS
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalNot yet recruitingCervical DystoniaChina
-
Deep Brain Innovations LLCTerminatedParkinson DiseaseUnited States
-
HagaZiekenhuisMaastricht University Medical Center; Amsterdam University Medical Centers...Not yet recruitingParkinson's Disease (PD)Netherlands
-
Jaimie M. HendersonHarvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM); The Cleveland Clinic; Weill Medical College... and other collaboratorsCompletedTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)United States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaCompletedParkinson DiseaseUnited States
-
University Medical Center GroningenUnknown
-
University of British ColumbiaRecruitingParkinson Disease | Cognitive ImpairmentCanada
-
Ruijin HospitalNational Natural Science Foundation of China; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount... and other collaboratorsWithdrawnObsessive Compulsive DisorderChina
-
University of NebraskaNational Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)RecruitingEssential Tremor | Parkinson's Disease (PD) | DystoniasUnited States
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...Radboud University Medical Center; University Medical Center Groningen; Maastricht... and other collaboratorsRecruitingCentral Nervous System Diseases | Essential Tremor | Deep Brain Stimulation | Magnetic Resonance | Diffusion Tensor ImagingNetherlands