Robot/Laparoscopic-Assisted Transanal Transection Duhamel Versus Modified Soave Pull-Through for TCA

January 14, 2026 updated by: Zebing Zheng, Zunyi Medical College

Robot/Laparoscopic-Assisted Transanal Transection Duhamel Versus Modified Soave Pull-Through for Total Colonic Hirschsprung Disease: A Multicenter Controlled Trial

Total colonic Hirschsprung disease (TCA) is the most severe form of Hirschsprung disease and is commonly managed with neonatal enterostomy followed by delayed definitive pull-through. Despite widespread use, the optimal reconstructive procedure for TCA remains uncertain. The Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through procedures are the two most frequently adopted techniques, each with distinct theoretical advantages and limitations regarding bowel function, enterocolitis risk, and anorectal physiology. With the increasing application of minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery, both procedures have been further refined; however, robust comparative evidence, particularly for total colonic disease, is lacking. To date, no multicenter study has provided a detailed comparison of postoperative functional outcomes and Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis between transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave procedures. This multicenter study compares robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through in patients with pathologically confirmed TCA after neonatal enterostomy, focusing on postoperative bowel function and enterocolitis incidence.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Total colonic Hirschsprung disease (TCA), also referred to as total colonic aganglionosis, represents the most severe phenotype of Hirschsprung disease and remains a major surgical challenge. Owing to extensive aganglionosis, poor nutritional status, and high risk of enterocolitis in the neonatal period, the current standard of care in most centers consists of neonatal enterostomy followed by a delayed definitive pull-through as a second-stage procedure. Despite advances in minimally invasive techniques, the optimal reconstructive strategy for TCA has not been established.

Among available options, the Duhamel procedure and the modified Soave pull-through are the two most commonly adopted techniques. The Duhamel approach, particularly when combined with a transanal external transection, preserves a retrorectal colonic reservoir, which may reduce anastomotic tension and theoretically improve postoperative bowel function. However, concerns remain regarding fecal stasis, residual spur formation, and the potential risk of postoperative enterocolitis. In contrast, the modified Soave procedure achieves complete endorectal pull-through and eliminates the aganglionic rectal segment, but it may be associated with a higher incidence of anastomotic stricture, cuff-related obstruction, and impaired anorectal motility, especially in patients with extensive disease such as TCA.

With the increasing adoption of robot-assisted and laparoscopic techniques, both procedures have been refined; nevertheless, direct comparative data evaluating functional outcomes, Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis, and perioperative parameters between transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave procedures-particularly in total colonic disease-remain scarce. To date, no multicenter study has provided a detailed, standardized comparison of these two surgical strategies in patients with pathologically confirmed TCA.

Therefore, this multicenter study aims to compare robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel and modified Soave pull-through in patients with total colonic Hirschsprung disease who underwent neonatal enterostomy, with a primary focus on postoperative bowel function and the incidence of Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Guizhou
      • Zunyi, Guizhou, China, 563000
        • Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Definitive diagnosis of total colonic Hirschsprung disease confirmed by pathology from biopsy at neonatal enterostomy, consistent with total colonic aganglionosis.
  2. Two-stage surgical strategy: neonatal enterostomy performed first, followed by definitive pull-through as a second-stage procedure.
  3. Planned definitive reconstruction by one of the following techniques:
  4. Robot-assisted transanal transection Duhamel, orModified Soave pull-through (minimally invasive abdominal phase allowed).
  5. Availability for follow-up assessments and outcomes collection per protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome).
  2. Definitive surgery performed by open laparotomy approach or Swenson procedure.
  3. One-stage primary pull-through without neonatal enterostomy (single-stage definitive management).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Transanal Transection Duhamel Pull-Through for total colonic aganglionosis

Arm A: Robot-Assisted Transanal Transection Duhamel (Modified Duhamel)

Procedure: Robot-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted abdominal mobilization (as per center standard) plus transanal external transection Duhamel pull-through with retrorectal channel creation and side-to-side colorectal/coloanal anastomosis according to a standardized operative protocol.

Perioperative care: Standardized bowel preparation (if used), antibiotic prophylaxis, postoperative feeding pathway, and anal dilatation schedule per protocol.

The modified Duhamel procedure was performed using a transanal external rectal transection technique. Following mobilization of the ganglionated colon, the distal rectum was transected externally through the anal canal, expanding pelvic operative space and improving exposure compared with conventional pelvic transection. A retrorectal channel was created, and the colon was pulled through posterior to the native rectum. Residual rectal septum (spur) was eliminated using a transanal external compression technique, enabling a wide side-to-side colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. The anterior rectal wall was preserved, maintaining rectal sensory structures and avoiding circumferential endorectal dissection as used in Soave procedures. This approach was intended to optimize anastomotic configuration and postoperative bowel function.
Active Comparator: Modified Soave Pull-Through for total colonic aganglionosis

Arm B: Modified Soave Pull-Through

Procedure: Minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robot-assisted per center capability) mobilization plus modified Soave endorectal pull-through with mucosectomy/cuff management according to a standardized operative protocol.

Perioperative care: Same enhanced recovery and dilatation protocol framework.

The modified Soave procedure was performed as a definitive pull-through following neonatal enterostomy. At approximately 1 year of age or older, patients underwent minimally invasive colectomy using a robotic-assisted or laparoscopic approach. The entire aganglionic colon was resected, and an endorectal pull-through was performed. The terminal ileum was delivered through the rectal cuff and anastomosed to the anal canal to restore intestinal continuity. This technique eliminates the aganglionic colorectal segment and avoids creation of a retrorectal pouch. Perioperative management and postoperative care were standardized across participating centers according to the study protocol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative bowel function
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Defecation function will be evaluated using the Rintala scoring, which comprises seven domains: bowel control, awareness of the urge to defecate, defecation frequency, stool consistency, fecal soiling, constipation, and social functioning. A total score of 17-20 points is classified as excellent, 12-16 points as good, 9-11 points as fair, and ≤8 points as poor.24 months after definitive pull-through .
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis (HAEC) incidence
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months

HAEC diagnosed using a standardized criterion ( prespecified clinical criteria) and recorded as:

cumulative incidence, number of episodes, episodes requiring hospitalization/IV antibiotics.

From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative time
Time Frame: During surgery
During definitive pull-through operation
During surgery
Intraoperative blood loss (ml)
Time Frame: During surgery
During surgery
Postoperative length of stay (days)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
postoperative complications
Time Frame: within 30 days and within 12 months

Overall postoperative complications within 30 days and within 12 months:

anastomotic stricture, postoperative bleeding, perianal dermatitis, other prespecified surgical complications (ileus, pelvic abscess, reoperation)

within 30 days and within 12 months
Number of anal dilatations
Time Frame: within 6 and 12 months
Number of anal dilatations required (count) within 6 and 12 months
within 6 and 12 months
Anal resting pressure
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Anal resting pressure measured by anorectal manometry (mmHg) at a standardized postoperative time point (6 months, 12 months and 24 months).
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Dehydration episodes
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Dehydration episodes (count) requiring medical intervention within 24 months.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Hospital readmissions
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months
Hospital readmissions (count) within 24 months.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hirschsprung Disease

Clinical Trials on Transanal Transection Duhamel operation

Subscribe