Applicability of Robotic Devices, Virtual and Augmented Reality in the Rehabilitation of People With Stroke During Treadmill Training

January 9, 2026 updated by: Tollár József, Somogy Megyei Kaposi Mór Teaching Hospital
  • Objective assessment of clinical symptoms, mobility and quality of life changes resulting from stroke and determination of changes resulting from therapies.
  • Assessment of the rehabilitation effectiveness of traditional treadmill training.
  • Assessment of the rehabilitation effectiveness of gait training performed on a treadmill with a robot-assisted soft-exoskeleton.
  • Assessment of the rehabilitation effectiveness of treadmill training supplemented with virtual and augmented reality.
  • Determination of the joint application possibilities of robot-assisted and virtual and augmented reality treadmill training in order to further increase the effectiveness.
  • Comparison of the effectiveness of different treadmill trainings.
  • Mapping of changes in gait patterns due to therapies using 3D motion analysis.
  • Mapping of changes in postural stability due to therapies using posturography.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Somogy County
      • Kaposvár, Somogy County, Hungary, 7400

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • has had a first ischemic stroke diagnosed by a neurologist based on CT or MRI;
  • neurological examination shows mobility and postural limitations;
  • mRS score of 2 or higher;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • multiple strokes in the medical history;
  • systolic blood pressure less than 120 or greater than 160 mmHg;
  • orthostatic hypotension;
  • carotid artery stenosis;
  • severe heart disease;
  • hemophilia;
  • traumatic brain injury;
  • seizure disorder; untreated diabetes;
  • abnormal electroencephalography;
  • Mini Mental Test score < 22;
  • abnormal blood panel;
  • use of sedatives; irregular medication;
  • severe aphasia (Western Aphasia Battery ≤ 25);
  • severe vision or hearing impairment;
  • severe sensory dysfunction;
  • severe orthopedic problem;
  • other neurological condition affecting motor function;
  • alcoholism;
  • drug use;
  • smoking after stroke diagnosis;
  • inability to walk at least 100 m with or without assistive devices in 6 minutes;
  • BBS score ≤ 32;
  • BI score ≤ 70;
  • inability to understand verbal instructions or signals on a television screen;
  • current participation in an individual or group exercise program outside of standard physiotherapy;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TT
Receiving high intensity treadmill training
The TT group performs high-intensity treadmill training on a conventional treadmill. 5 times/week for 3 weeks, 30 minutes each.
Experimental: R-TT
Receiving high intensity treadmill training with ReStore robotic device.
The TT group performs high-intensity treadmill training on a conventional treadmill. Before the training begins, the ReStore Soft exoskeleton, which is a special gait assist device, is fitted. The device uses motion sensors to process the movements of the lower limb on the healthy side and uses a motor attached to the waist to map them using bowden cables while walking on the affected paretic side in real time. During therapy, the amount of assistance provided by the exoskeleton can be continuously adjusted to the patient's needs from an external controller, so that therapy can be performed in a specialized manner for the individual. 5 times/week for 3 weeks, 30 minutes each.
Experimental: VR&AR-TT
Receiving treadmill training with C-Mill, a special treadmill that provides virtual and augmented reality.
The VR&AR-TT group performs treadmill training on a special treadmill, the C-Mill VR+ device, for which the virtual and augmented reality movement programs are provided by the CueFors 2.5 software, which is the original control software for the C-Mill. The C-Mill VR+ system is a 3 m long and 1 m wide treadmill with a force platform underneath. A 65" fixed-position monitor in front of the treadmill provides the virtual reality environment, and a projector placed next to the treadmill allows various tasks to be projected onto the treadmill belt, providing immediate real-time feedback to the patient and therapist via the force platform. 5 times/week for 3 weeks, 30 minutes each.
Experimental: C-TT
Receiving treadmill training with the combination of the ReStore and C-Mill system.
Patients in the C-TT group use the ReStore Soft exoskeleton and the C-Mill VR+ system together. 5 times/week for 3 weeks, 30 minutes each.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) indicates the degree of independence in daily activities and the severity of disability. The method for assessing mRs is a guided interview. . The scoring is divided as follows: 0-No symptoms; 1-No significant disability. Able to carry out activities of daily living despite some symptoms; 2-Mild disability. Able to look after himself without assistance but not able to carry out all previous activities; 3-Moderate disability. Needs some assistance with activities of daily living but can walk without assistance; 4-Moderately severe disability. Unassisted, unable to meet his/her own physical needs, unable to walk without assistance; 5-Severe disability. Bedridden, incontinent, requires constant nursing care; 6-Dead
3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
The SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey) is a widely used, patient-reported questionnaire that assesses health-related quality of life across 8 domains: physical functioning, bodily pain, role limitations (physical & emotional), vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health perceptions. All questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the highest level of functioning possible. Aggregate scores are compiled as a percentage of the total points possible, using the RAND scoring table.The scores from those questions that address each specific area of functional health status are then averaged together, for a final score within each of the 8 dimensions measured. (eg pain, physical functioning etc.)
3 weeks
Stroke Impact Scale-16 (SIS-16)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
The Stroke Impact Scale-16 (SIS-16) consists of 16 items from the 4 physical domains (strength, hand function, mobility, and ADL/IADL). Scoring involves rating 16 physical function items on a 1-to-5 Likert scale (1=could not do at all, 5=not difficult at all), with higher scores indicating better function.
3 weeks
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was used to measure static and dynamic balance. The BBS can objectively measure the subject's ability to balance safely during a series of pre-determined tasks. It is a 14-item task, with each item scored on a five-point scale from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates the lowest level of function and 4 the highest. The maximum score is 56, indicating perfect functional balance. A score below 45 indicates an increased risk of falling, and, the lower the score, the higher the risk of falling.
3 weeks
Tinetti test
Time Frame: 3 weeks
The Tinetti test is a common clinical tool for assessing mobility, balance (static and dynamic) and gait in the elderly, especially for assessing fall risk. Scoring: 0, 1, 2 points for each subscale. Total score 28. A score below 25 points significantly increases the likelihood of falling
3 weeks
6 minute walking test (6MWT)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
To measure endurance, we used a 6-minute walk test (6mWT). During the test, the subject walks back and forth along a pre-designated flat and straight 50 m long trail. The walk starts when the timer is started at the tester's command; the pace of the walk is set by the subject, with no interference from the tester. If the subject needs to stop for a rest during the walk, the timing is not stopped. The subject will continue walking for 6 min and will stop only at the direction of the examiner after the 6 min have elapsed. The result is the distance covered in 6 min, expressed in meters. If the subject is required to stop and sit down within the 6 min, the test result is the distance covered. The greater the distance traveled, the better the endurance required.
3 weeks
10 meter walking test
Time Frame: 3 weeks
A 10-meter walk test (10mWT) was used to measure walking speed. To perform the test, a 10 m long flat, level area was designated. The 10 m section was marked at 0, 2, 8 and 10 m with thick adhesive tape. The subject started walking at the 0 m mark on the instructions of the examiner. As soon as he reached the 2 m mark, the examiner started the timer and stopped it the moment he reached the 8 m mark, thus testing his walking speed over a 6 m stretch. The speed is given by the distance (6 m) divided by the time measured (in seconds to two decimal places) in m/s
3 weeks
Posturographic examination
Time Frame: 3 weeks
During the postural examination, the presence and extent of postural instability were monitored using a posturograph (ProKin 252N, TecnoBody, Dalmine, Italy). During the test, the subjects were asked to stand on the test apparatus for 20 s in 4 different in-creasingly difficult postures: 1-wide stance-eye open (WEO); 2-wide stance-eye closed (WEC); 3-narrow stance-eye open (NEO); 4-narrow stance-eye closed (NEC). During the test, the subjects stood barefoot on the test apparatus and were not exposed to any external stimuli during the test. The results are provided by the 3-dimensional path of the body's center of pressure (COP-Sway). The smaller the COP-Sway , the lower the postural instability.
3 weeks
3D gait analysis - Spatiotemporal parameters
Time Frame: 3 weeks

For 3D gait analysis we use the MVN Awinda motion capture system developed by Xsens (Movella, El Segundo, Califonia, US) and the MVN Analyze (version 2025.0.1.) motion analysis software. The MVN Awinda motion capture system consists of a total of 17 inertial measurement units (IMUs), which include accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers. The sensors are placed at different predefined anatomical points on the body.

The 3D gait analysis includes multiple distinct gait parameters, each representing an independent outcome with its own unit of measure. These parameters are not aggregated into a single composite score, but are analyzed and reported separately as standard spatiotemporal gait outcomes.

Spatiotemporal parameters: Gait speed (m/s); Number of steps (count); Cadence (steps/min).

3 weeks
3D gait analysis - Spatial parameters
Time Frame: 3 weeks

For 3D gait analysis we use the MVN Awinda motion capture system developed by Xsens (Movella, El Segundo, Califonia, US) and the MVN Analyze (version 2025.0.1.) motion analysis software. The MVN Awinda motion capture system consists of a total of 17 inertial measurement units (IMUs), which include accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers. The sensors are placed at different predefined anatomical points on the body.

The 3D gait analysis includes multiple distinct gait parameters, each representing an independent outcome with its own unit of measure. These parameters are not aggregated into a single composite score, but are analyzed and reported separately as standard spatiotemporal gait outcomes. Spatial parameters: Step length - Left (cm); Step length - Right (cm); Step length difference (cm); Step width - Left (cm); Step width - Right (cm); Step width difference (cm).

3 weeks
10. 3D gait analysis - Temporal parameters
Time Frame: 3 weeks
For 3D gait analysis we use the MVN Awinda motion capture system developed by Xsens (Movella, El Segundo, Califonia, US) and the MVN Analyze (version 2025.0.1.) motion analysis software. The MVN Awinda motion capture system consists of a total of 17 inertial measurement units (IMUs), which include accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers. The sensors are placed at different predefined anatomical points on the body. The 3D gait analysis includes multiple distinct gait parameters, each representing an independent outcome with its own unit of measure. These parameters are not aggregated into a single composite score, but are analyzed and reported separately as standard spatiotemporal gait outcomes. Temporal parameters (percentage of gait cycle): Total gait cycle - Left (%); Total gait cycle - Right (%); Swing phase - Left (%); Swing phase - Right (%); Stance phase - Left (%); Stance phase - Right (%); Double support phase - Left (%); Double support phase - Right (%).
3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: József Dr. habil. Tollár, Somogy County Kaposi Mor Teaching Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Treadmill Training

Subscribe