Integrating Hepatological, Nutritional, and Psychological Support as a Multidisciplinary Management to Improve Long-term Clinical Outcomes in MASLD (CoCoNut)

February 10, 2026 updated by: Alessandro Federico, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

Integrating Hepatological, Nutritional, and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-based Psychological Support is an Effective Multidisciplinary Approach to Improve Long-term Clinical Outcomes in the Management of MASLD Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial [The "CoCoNut" Study]

Metabolic dysfunction associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) is frequently complicated by cardiometabolic (CMR) comorbidities, and prognosis is substantially influenced by acute cardiovascular events (ACE). Although several pharmacological approaches target CMR risk factors, lifestyle modification remains the cornerstone of management. However, adherence to dietary behavioral prescriptions is often poor, and the influence of sociodemographic determinants on compliance remains unclear. Moreover, the long-term real-life impact of behavioral and motivational support in MASLD is insufficiently characterized.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary management (including Hepatological counseling, Nutrition intervention, and Psychological support) in improving clinical MASLD outcomes, by increasing adherence to specialist-tailored recommendations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Metabolic dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver disease (MASLD) represents a predominant hepatopathy worldwide, as well as a complex systemic condition complicated by various extra-hepatic dysmetabolic manifestations.

Among these, acute cardiovascular events represent a serious burden, drastically increasing mortality rates, emphasizing the absolute need for holistic and multidisciplinary treatment strategies.

Even though several pharmacological approaches have been proposed, targeting the different dysmetabolic manifestations, lifestyle changes remain the paramount intervention for patients with simple steatosis. However, adherence to dietary and behavioral recommendations is often poor. Growing evidence highlights the importance of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in supporting these recommendations. However, the real benefits of providing motivational support to individuals with MASLD remain largely unexplored in real-world applications.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary approach (integrating Hepatological counseling, Nutrition intervention, and Psychological support) in improving long-term clinical MASLD outcomes, by increasing adherence to specialist-tailored recommendations, as well as to investigate the social determinants impacting on the loss of compliance with this strategy.

MASLD patients will be consecutively enrolled and randomized into three Groups:

  • Group A - following generic hepatologist-provided advice ("H"),
  • Group B- also receiving a nutritionist-prescribed individualized intervention ("HN")
  • Group C- receiving an approach which additionally involves cognitive/behavioral-based psychological support ("HNP")

Groups A and B represent the "standard of care" cohort, while Group B represents the "experimental" cohort.

Baseline anthropometric, biochemical, clinical, liver stiffness (LSM), controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), lifestyle habits (including dietary and physical exercise), and body composition values will be recorded.

Along 18 months:

  • Semestral hepatological (for all), nutritional (H and HN), and psychological (HNP) follow-ups reassess variables and evaluated compliance.
  • Acute Cardiovascular events will be recorded

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

286

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Campania
      • Naples, Campania, Italy, 80138
        • University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 40 and 79 years,
  • a diagnosis of MASLD, configured by the presence of hepatic steatosis (proven by instrumental and/or histological methods), with at least one of the five cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs) as established by the updated multi-society Delphi consensus proposed criteria,
  • willingness to sign a valid informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unavailability or inability to express written consent,
  • chronic liver diseases other than MASLD/overlap ongoing causes (including chronic hepatitis B virus infection, chronic hepatitis C virus infection, autoimmune hepatitis, chronic cholestasis, genetic diseases determining steatosis, and alcohol-related liver disorder assumed in the evidence of a history of alcohol intake greater than 20 g/day or 140 g/week),
  • administration of liver-damaging (Drug-induced liver Injury) (DILI) / hepatic steatosis inducing drugs (Drug-Induced Fatty Liver Disease) (DIFLD),
  • hepatoprotective drugs administration,
  • consumption of hypoglycemic, hypolipidemic, and weight loss agents, as well as any drug known to influence liver function,
  • neoplasms,
  • chronic systemic inflammatory diseases,
  • eating disorders (ED)
  • other psychiatric disorders potentially invalidating the consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A - "Hep"
Hepatologist counseling providing generic lifestyle recommendations

Hepatologic counseling will be offered every six months to individuals belonging to all study groups. These specialists-provided check-ups consisted of recording, at baseline, demographics and, at baseline and every six months, collecting anthropometrical, biochemical, clinical (including the assessment of previous cardiovascular events and the determination of individual cardiovascular risk), and body composition data, as well as evaluating the liver disease progression by using Noninvasive tools (NITs) (Fibroscan CAP).

Moreover, at baseline, the hepatologist, after assessing the initial compliance of each individual with the Mediterranean diet and active physical exercise, by respectively adopting the MDS questionnaire and the IPAQ-SF score questionnaire, also recommended, for the entire duration of the study, generic lifestyle changes, including a Mediterranean diet style, and proper physical activity (> 150 min/week of moderate - or 75 min/week of vigorous physical activity).

Active Comparator: Group B - "Hep + Nut"
Hepatologist counseling with the integration of tailored lifestyle recommendations, including personalized physical exercise and dietary plan, provided by a nutritionist

Hepatologic counseling will be offered every six months to individuals belonging to all study groups. These specialists-provided check-ups consisted of recording, at baseline, demographics and, at baseline and every six months, collecting anthropometrical, biochemical, clinical (including the assessment of previous cardiovascular events and the determination of individual cardiovascular risk), and body composition data, as well as evaluating the liver disease progression by using Noninvasive tools (NITs) (Fibroscan CAP).

Moreover, at baseline, the hepatologist, after assessing the initial compliance of each individual with the Mediterranean diet and active physical exercise, by respectively adopting the MDS questionnaire and the IPAQ-SF score questionnaire, also recommended, for the entire duration of the study, generic lifestyle changes, including a Mediterranean diet style, and proper physical activity (> 150 min/week of moderate - or 75 min/week of vigorous physical activity).

Nutritional counseling by a specialist will be provided on a semestral basis, scheduled on the same day as the hepatology follow-up visits, although conducted separately and after the hepatology consultation, and was offered exclusively to patients in Groups B and C. In these occasions, specialised anamnesis will be performed (including the investigation of general dietary habits, food allergies, and taste preferences), as well as the multicompartmental BIA-assessed body composition results will be properly interpreted to design, and eventually dynamically change along the duration of the study, a personalised dietary plan with a tailored physical activity strategy (integrating the generic recommendations received by the hepatologists), as well as to establish, and periodically revaluate, individual body composition outcomes.
Experimental: Group C - "Hep + Nut + Psy"
Hepatologist counseling with the integration of tailored lifestyle recommendations, including personalized physical exercise and dietary plan, provided by a nutritionist, combined with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program-based psychological support, offered by a psychologist specialist

Hepatologic counseling will be offered every six months to individuals belonging to all study groups. These specialists-provided check-ups consisted of recording, at baseline, demographics and, at baseline and every six months, collecting anthropometrical, biochemical, clinical (including the assessment of previous cardiovascular events and the determination of individual cardiovascular risk), and body composition data, as well as evaluating the liver disease progression by using Noninvasive tools (NITs) (Fibroscan CAP).

Moreover, at baseline, the hepatologist, after assessing the initial compliance of each individual with the Mediterranean diet and active physical exercise, by respectively adopting the MDS questionnaire and the IPAQ-SF score questionnaire, also recommended, for the entire duration of the study, generic lifestyle changes, including a Mediterranean diet style, and proper physical activity (> 150 min/week of moderate - or 75 min/week of vigorous physical activity).

Nutritional counseling by a specialist will be provided on a semestral basis, scheduled on the same day as the hepatology follow-up visits, although conducted separately and after the hepatology consultation, and was offered exclusively to patients in Groups B and C. In these occasions, specialised anamnesis will be performed (including the investigation of general dietary habits, food allergies, and taste preferences), as well as the multicompartmental BIA-assessed body composition results will be properly interpreted to design, and eventually dynamically change along the duration of the study, a personalised dietary plan with a tailored physical activity strategy (integrating the generic recommendations received by the hepatologists), as well as to establish, and periodically revaluate, individual body composition outcomes.
The psychological intervention will be structured in sequential phases to enhance disease awareness, coping skills, and adherence to lifestyle changes. The first 90-minute session will include a comprehensive personal, familial, and physiological assessment, with systematic evaluation of social determinants of health using a dedicated CRF. The psychologist will assess disease awareness, quality of life, motivation for change, and treatment expectations. Emotional and cognitive components will be explored through interviews and standardized tools (BAI, BDI-II). Individualized therapeutic goals will be jointly defined. Weekly 60-minute sessions over six months will address previous behavioural change attempts, barriers, facilitators, and strategy refinement. Motivation will be continuously monitored according to the Transtheoretical Model. Semiannual follow-up sessions will reassess progress and address emotional or situational challenges.
Other Names:
  • Cognitive behavioral therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body Weight reduction
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
The primary endpoint of this study was to highlight a significantly higher proportion (at least > 15%) of patients obtaining (intermediate time-point, i.e., after 12 months), and maintaining (end of the study, i.e., after 18 months), a reduction of at least 10% in body weight in the experimental cohort compared with the standard of care
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Variations in anthropometric parameters
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
After 18 months, at the end of the study, in the experimental cohort compared with the standard of care, to report a statistically significant improvement of Body Mass Index (BMI) and Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)].
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
Different risk of acute cardiovascular events
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
In the experimental cohort compared with the standard of care, to highlight significant changes in cardiovascular risk by using the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk score, adopting the calculator available online on the American College of Cardiology website (https://tools.acc.org/ascvd-risk-estimator-plus) (accessed on 4th June 2024), considering > 7.5% the threshold defining a significant risk.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
Variations in metabolic variables (glycometabolic)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
After the 18 months, at the end of the study, in the experimental cohort compared with the standard of care, to report a statistically significant improvement of Homeostatic Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR),
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
Variations in metabolic parameters (lipidic variables)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
After the 18 months, at the end of the study, in the experimental cohort compared with the standard of care, to report a statistically significant improvement of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL)],
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
Variations in body composition
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
After 18 months, at the end of the study, in the experimental cohort compared with the standard of care, to report a statistically significant improvement of body composition parameters [free-fat mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM)].
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
Variations in Liver Stiffness
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
After the 18 months, at the end of the study, in the experimental cohort compared with the standard of care, to report a statistically significant improvement of Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM).
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
Variations in Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months
After the 18 months, at the end of the study, in the experimental cohort compared with the standard of care, to report a statistically significant improvement of Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP).
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relationship between anxiety severity and levels of compliance with the intervention
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months

To reveal a significant correlation between anxiety levels [Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) questionnaire] and levels of compliance with the assigned intervention.

Note: Adherence to the assigned behavioral intervention is assessed using a 4-item questionnaire specifically developed for this study. The tool is conceptually informed by general adherence principles but is independently created, with original items and scoring, and does not reproduce or rely on the proprietary MMAS-4.

From enrollment to the end of intervention at 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Events

Clinical Trials on Hepatologic-provided recommendations

Subscribe