- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07366814
Pipelle Versus Karman Endometrial Biopsy Under Standardized Paracervical Block (PB-EMB)
Comparison of Pipelle and Karman Endometrial Biopsy Methods Under Standardized Paracervical Block: A Prospective Randomized Study
Endometrial biopsy is a commonly used outpatient procedure to evaluate abnormal uterine bleeding and postmenopausal bleeding. Different sampling methods are available, but their diagnostic adequacy and patient experience may vary.
This prospective randomized study compares two commonly used endometrial biopsy methods, Pipelle and Karman cannula, under standardized paracervical block anesthesia. All participants receive the same local anesthetic technique to minimize pain-related differences between methods.
The primary objective is to compare the rate of clinically adequate endometrial samples obtained with each method. Secondary outcomes include patient-reported pain, patient satisfaction, procedure duration, need for additional diagnostic procedures, and hospital-related costs.
Study findings are expected to support clinical decision-making regarding the most effective and practical endometrial biopsy method when adequate pain control is provided.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Endometrial biopsy is an essential diagnostic procedure in the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding and postmenopausal bleeding. Office-based endometrial sampling techniques are widely used because these techniques are minimally invasive and cost-effective; however, diagnostic adequacy, patient tolerance, and resource utilization may differ between methods.
Pain during the procedure is a major factor affecting patient experience and may confound comparisons between sampling techniques. To address this limitation, participants receive a standardized paracervical block using the same anesthetic agent, dose, and technique, allowing the comparison to focus on the intrinsic performance of the biopsy methods rather than differences in analgesia.
This is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group study. Eligible participants undergoing endometrial biopsy are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either Pipelle endometrial biopsy or Karman cannula endometrial sampling. Randomization is stratified by menopausal status. Procedures are performed in an outpatient setting according to routine clinical practice.
Histopathological evaluation of endometrial samples is performed by pathologists blinded to the sampling method. Sample adequacy is assessed based on predefined criteria, with a focus on whether the specimen provides sufficient information for clinical decision-making.
In addition to diagnostic adequacy, patient-reported outcomes, including pain and satisfaction with the procedure, are assessed. Procedure duration, need for additional diagnostic interventions due to inadequate sampling, and hospital-related costs associated with each method are also evaluated.
Standardized analgesia and inclusion of clinical, patient-centered, and economic outcomes are intended to provide practical evidence to guide the selection of endometrial biopsy methods in routine gynecologic practice.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
- University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female participants aged 18 years or older
- Abnormal uterine bleeding or postmenopausal bleeding requiring endometrial sampling
- Ability to provide written informed consent
- Eligible for office-based endometrial biopsy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Active pelvic infection
- Known cervical or endometrial cancer
- Severe cervical stenosis preventing endometrial sampling
- Known bleeding disorders or use of anticoagulant therapy that contraindicates biopsy
- Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Pipelle Endometrial Biopsy
Participants assigned to this arm undergo office-based endometrial biopsy using a Pipelle device.
All procedures are performed under standardized paracervical block anesthesia with the same anesthetic agent, dose, and technique as the other study arm.
|
Endometrial sampling performed using a Pipelle device in an outpatient setting.
The procedure is conducted under standardized paracervical block anesthesia using the same anesthetic agent, dose, and technique for all participants.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Karman Endometrial Biopsy
Participants assigned to this arm undergo office-based endometrial sampling using a Karman cannula.
All procedures are performed under standardized paracervical block anesthesia with the same anesthetic agent, dose, and technique as the other study arm.
|
Endometrial sampling performed using a Karman cannula in an outpatient setting.
The procedure is conducted under standardized paracervical block anesthesia using the same anesthetic agent, dose, and technique for all participants.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinically Adequate Endometrial Sample Rate
Time Frame: At the index procedure (same day)
|
Proportion of endometrial biopsy samples considered clinically adequate for diagnosis based on blinded histopathological assessment.
|
At the index procedure (same day)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Procedure-Related Pain Score
Time Frame: Periprocedural
|
Eligible participants undergo outpatient endometrial sampling under a standardized analgesia protocol: 3 mL of 2% prilocaine is injected for a paracervical block at the 1 and 11 o'clock positions before tenaculum application, followed by a 2-minute waiting period; a tenaculum is then applied and endometrial sampling is performed using either a Pipelle device or a 5-mm Karman cannula according to random assignment.
Sampling is recorded as the number of predefined sampling cycles (maximum 3), and cervical stenosis, need for dilation, procedure duration, additional analgesia (e.g., NSAIDs), and complications are documented.
Specimens are placed immediately in formalin in identical containers labeled with study ID only, sent daily in mixed order, and evaluated by pathologists blinded to sampling method for adequacy and diagnosis (including reason for inadequacy).
Pain is assessed using the Visual Analog Scale for Pain (0-10; higher scores indicate worse pain) during the procedure and at 3
|
Periprocedural
|
|
Patient Satisfaction With the Procedure
Time Frame: Same day after the procedure
|
Patient-reported satisfaction with the endometrial biopsy procedure assessed using a Likert-type questionnaire, including willingness to undergo the same procedure again if needed.
|
Same day after the procedure
|
|
Procedure Duration
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
Time required to complete the endometrial biopsy procedure, measured from speculum insertion to completion of tissue sampling.
|
During the procedure
|
|
Need for Additional Diagnostic Procedures
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks after the procedure
|
Proportion of participants requiring additional diagnostic procedures due to an inadequate endometrial biopsy sample.
|
Within 2 weeks after the procedure
|
|
Hospital-Related Cost per Participant
Time Frame: Within 2 weeks after the procedure
|
Total hospital-related cost per participant, including procedural costs and costs related to additional diagnostic interventions when required.
|
Within 2 weeks after the procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Fatma Ketenci Gencer, Assoc. Prof., University of Health Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Uterine Diseases
- Genital Diseases, Female
- Hemorrhage
- Uterine Hemorrhage
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Behavior
- Treatment Adherence and Compliance
- Health Behavior
- Metrorrhagia
- Patient Satisfaction
Other Study ID Numbers
- EK-193-2025-EMB
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
-
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode IslandActive, not recruitingAbnormal Uterine Bleeding | Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Ovulatory Dysfunction | Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Endometrial Hemostatic DysfunctionUnited States
-
University of California, DavisWashington University School of MedicineTerminatedUterine Bleeding Heavy | Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, UnspecifiedUnited States
-
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research HospitalCompletedAbnormal Uterine Bleeding
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityUnknown
-
Indiana UniversityCompleted
-
Mahidol UniversityCompletedAbnormal Uterine Bleeding | Endometrial BiopsyThailand
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedCesarean Section; Dehiscence | Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
-
Maxima Medical CenterUtrecht UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
The Cleveland ClinicCompletedAbnormal Uterine BleedingUnited States
-
Mahmoud Ramadan HafezRecruitingCesarean Section Niche and Abnormal Uterine BleedingEgypt
Clinical Trials on Pipelle Endometrial Biopsy
-
Jon HavelockTerminatedInfertility | PregnancyCanada
-
Royal Free Hampstead NHS TrustCompletedAbnormal Uterine BleedingUnited Kingdom
-
The University of Hong KongTerminated
-
University of AarhusCompleted
-
Yazd Research & Clinical Center for InfertilityYazd Medical UniversityCompleted
-
Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustRecruitingEndometrial Hyperplasia | Endometrial Cancer | Post-Menopausal BleedingUnited Kingdom
-
Oslo University HospitalUniversity of Oslo; Helse Sor-OstActive, not recruiting
-
University of BirminghamCompleted
-
Bangalore Assisted Conception CentreCompleted