Validation of a Prognostic Method for Assessing the Risk of Distant Metastasis in Early-stage Breast Cancer (PORTENT)

January 29, 2026 updated by: Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza IRCCS

Dissecting the Role of miR-3916 and miR3613-5p in Breast Cancer and Developing a Metastases Predictor PORTENT Algorithm

This is a multicenter, observational validation study designed to evaluate the prognostic performance of the PORTENT algorithm in patients with early-stage breast cancer. The model integrates clinicopathological variables and the expression levels of two small non-coding RNAs (miR-3916 and miR-3613-5p) to estimate individual risk of developing distant metastases.

The primary objective is to assess the discriminatory ability of the PORTENT algorithm for predicting distant metastasis at predefined time points after diagnosis.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

This multicenter retrospective observational study aims to clinically validate the PORTENT prognostic algorithm for predicting the risk of distant metastases in women with early-stage breast cancer. Female patients with Stage I-III disease from three independent cohorts with available residual tumor tissue and follow-up data will be included.

The primary endpoint of the study is the discriminatory performance of the PORTENT algorithm, assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the prediction of distant metastases at 5 and 10 years from diagnosis.

The algorithm integrates established clinicopathological prognostic factors (tumor stage, histological grade, and Ki67-MIB1) with the expression levels of miR-3916 and miR-3613-5p. MicroRNA expression and target protein expression will be evaluated using RT-qPCR and immunohistochemistry.

Secondary and exploratory analyses will include model calibration assessed using calibration curves and the Integrated Calibration Index (ICI), as well as survival analyses (overall survival, progression-free survival, and metastasis-free survival) performed using Cox proportional hazards models.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • FG
      • San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy, 71013
        • Fondazione Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza IRCCS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study includes three cohorts: CSS-cohort_2: 350 cases with ≥5 years follow-up, prospectively enrolled 2014-2019 within the TRANSCAN-BREMIR Study (Refs: Prot 116/CE 30/09/2014; Prot 140/CE 28/10/2014; Prot 150/CE 24/10/2018). External cohort: ≥450 patients with available residual tumor tissue, retrospectively selected; each center enrolls ≥75 patients (60 disease-free ≥5 years, 15 with metastatic progression ≥3 years). INT_Milan cohort: 300 Luminal A breast cancer cases treated with neoadjuvant therapy, with pre-treatment and/or surgical residual tumor tissue available.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stage I-III breast cancer
  • Residual tumor tissue available
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18
  • Stage IV at diagnosis
  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
CSS Cohort
350 stage 1 to 3A patients will be selected from the BREMIR study (ID NCT06555354) prospective cohort.

Collection of Clinical History: Clinical data, including medical history, clinicopathological features (e.g., age, histology, receptor and nodal status), and follow-up information (presence or absence of metastasis, patient vital status), will be collected and entered into a dedicated platform by. Follow-up updates are scheduled by Month 48 of the project (December 31, 2025) to ensure timely and accurate patient outcome data.

Laboratory Analysis: Residual tumor sections prepared by the Pathology Unit of each participating center will be sent to the Oncology Laboratory at CSS-IRCCS, where RNA will be extracted using standardized experimental procedures. Expression levels of miR-3916, miR-3613-5p, and their target genes will be analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). Protein expression of target genes will be assessed via immunohistochemistry. Additionally, the extracted RNA will be analyzed at the Gerobiomics and Exposomics Laboratory of IRST IRCCS.

External Cohort
The External_cohort will include patients enrolled retrospectively from the centers participating in the study. A total of at least 450 patients will be selected, with residual tumor tissue available at the respective Pathology Departments. Each center will enroll a minimum of 75 patients, comprising 60 who remain disease-free after at least 5 years of follow-up and 15 who experience metastatic progression after at least 3 years of follow-up.

Collection of Clinical History: Clinical data, including medical history, clinicopathological features (e.g., age, histology, receptor and nodal status), and follow-up information (presence or absence of metastasis, patient vital status), will be collected and entered into a dedicated platform by. Follow-up updates are scheduled by Month 48 of the project (December 31, 2025) to ensure timely and accurate patient outcome data.

Laboratory Analysis: Residual tumor sections prepared by the Pathology Unit of each participating center will be sent to the Oncology Laboratory at CSS-IRCCS, where RNA will be extracted using standardized experimental procedures. Expression levels of miR-3916, miR-3613-5p, and their target genes will be analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). Protein expression of target genes will be assessed via immunohistochemistry. Additionally, the extracted RNA will be analyzed at the Gerobiomics and Exposomics Laboratory of IRST IRCCS.

INT-Milan
The INT_Milan cohort includes 300 Luminal A breast cancer cases treated with neoadjuvant therapy, with available pre-treatment and/or surgical residual tumor tissue.

Collection of Clinical History: Clinical data, including medical history, clinicopathological features (e.g., age, histology, receptor and nodal status), and follow-up information (presence or absence of metastasis, patient vital status), will be collected and entered into a dedicated platform by. Follow-up updates are scheduled by Month 48 of the project (December 31, 2025) to ensure timely and accurate patient outcome data.

Laboratory Analysis: Residual tumor sections prepared by the Pathology Unit of each participating center will be sent to the Oncology Laboratory at CSS-IRCCS, where RNA will be extracted using standardized experimental procedures. Expression levels of miR-3916, miR-3613-5p, and their target genes will be analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). Protein expression of target genes will be assessed via immunohistochemistry. Additionally, the extracted RNA will be analyzed at the Gerobiomics and Exposomics Laboratory of IRST IRCCS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discriminatory Performance of the Prognostic Algorithm (AUC) for Prediction of Distant Metastasis Within 5 Years From Diagnosis
Time Frame: 5 years from diagnosis; interim analysis at March 2027.
Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals for patient-level risk probabilities generated by the prognostic algorithm to predict the occurrence of distant metastases within 5 years after breast cancer diagnosis. Discrimination will be assessed using ROC curve analysis and DeLong's test.
5 years from diagnosis; interim analysis at March 2027.
Discriminatory Performance of the Prognostic Algorithm (AUC) for Prediction of Distant Metastasis Within 10 Years From Diagnosis
Time Frame: 10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of 10-year follow-up for all participants (expected by 2029).
Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals for patient-level risk probabilities generated by the prognostic algorithm to predict the occurrence of distant metastases within 10 years after breast cancer diagnosis. Discrimination will be assessed using ROC curve analysis and DeLong's test.
10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of 10-year follow-up for all participants (expected by 2029).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Calibration of the Prognostic Model at 5 Years (Integrated Calibration Index)
Time Frame: 5 years from diagnosis; interim analysis at March 2027.
Calibration of the prognostic algorithm will be evaluated at 5 years using the Integrated Calibration Index (ICI) and calibration plots to assess agreement between predicted and observed distant metastasis risk.
5 years from diagnosis; interim analysis at March 2027.
Calibration of the Prognostic Model at 10 Years (Integrated Calibration Index)
Time Frame: 10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of 10-year follow-up (expected by 2029).
Calibration of the prognostic algorithm will be evaluated at 10 years using the Integrated Calibration Index (ICI) and calibration plots to assess agreement between predicted and observed distant metastasis risk.
10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of 10-year follow-up (expected by 2029).
Difference in Discriminatory Performance Between Prognostic Models (ΔAUC) at 5 Years
Time Frame: 5 years from diagnosis; interim analysis at March 2027.
Difference in AUC between the standard clinical prognostic model (clinicopathological variables only) and the extended model including miR-3916 and miR-3613-5p expression for prediction of distant metastases at 5 years. Statistical comparison will be performed using DeLong's test.
5 years from diagnosis; interim analysis at March 2027.
Difference in Discriminatory Performance Between Prognostic Models (ΔAUC) at 10 Years
Time Frame: 10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of 10-year follow-up (expected by 2029).
Difference in AUC between the standard clinical prognostic model (clinicopathological variables only) and the extended model including miR-3916 and miR-3613-5p expression for prediction of distant metastases at 10 years. Statistical comparison will be performed using DeLong's test.
10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of 10-year follow-up (expected by 2029).
Classification Performance of the Prognostic Algorithm at 10 Years (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV)
Time Frame: 10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of 10-year follow-up (expected by 2029).
Estimation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), with 95% confidence intervals, for predefined probability thresholds corresponding to low (<10%), intermediate (10-30%), and high (>30%) 10-year distant metastasis risk categories.
10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of 10-year follow-up (expected by 2029).
Association Between miR-3916 and miR-3613-5p Expression and Overall Survival
Time Frame: Up to 10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of follow-up (expected by 2029).
Association between miR-3916 and miR-3613-5p expression levels and overall survival, assessed using hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals from Cox proportional hazards models.
Up to 10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of follow-up (expected by 2029).
Prognostic Algorithm Performance Within PAM50 Molecular Subgroups
Time Frame: 5 and 10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of follow-up (expected by 2029).
Discriminatory performance and calibration of the prognostic algorithm within PAM50 molecular subgroups (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched, Basal-like), evaluated using AUC and calibration metrics.
5 and 10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of follow-up (expected by 2029).
Analytical Validity of miRNA Expression Assessment
Time Frame: Data collection and analysis completed by March 2027.
Assessment of analytical validity of miR-3916 and miR-3613-5p expression measurement, including RNA yield, RT-qPCR amplification success rate, and assay reproducibility. This outcome assesses technical performance only.
Data collection and analysis completed by March 2027.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification and Analytical Validation of miRNA Target Genes
Time Frame: Data collection and analyses completed by March 2027.
Identification and analytical validation of molecular target genes regulated by miR-3916 and/or miR-3613-5p using in silico prediction, experimental confirmation, assay development, and RT-qPCR analytical validation.
Data collection and analyses completed by March 2027.
Correlation of miRNA Target Gene Expression With Clinical Outcomes and Clinicopathological Features
Time Frame: Up to 10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of follow-up (expected by 2029).
Correlation of mRNA and protein expression levels of validated miRNA target genes with clinical outcomes (overall survival, progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival) and clinicopathological characteristics.
Up to 10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of follow-up (expected by 2029).
Improvement in Prognostic Risk Classification (NRI and IDI)
Time Frame: 5 and 10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of follow-up (expected by 2029).
Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) assessing improvement in patient risk stratification achieved by extending the prognostic algorithm with miRNA target gene expression data.
5 and 10 years from diagnosis; final analysis after completion of follow-up (expected by 2029).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD), including raw tumor expression data, clinicopathological features, and follow-up information collected during this study, may be shared with participating centers and other qualified researchers upon formal request. Data sharing will be conducted under strict data use agreements to ensure confidentiality, data security, and compliance with all applicable ethical and legal standards. Access to IPD will be granted solely for scientifically valid, collaborative research purposes following approval by the study steering committee or data access committee. Requests must include a detailed research proposal, data management plan, and evidence of ethical approval. This policy promotes transparency, facilitates scientific collaboration, and aims to maximize the utility of collected data while protecting participant privacy and rights.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available starting six months after primary study publication and will remain accessible for up to five years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documents-including the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and analytic code-will be granted to qualified researchers affiliated with participating centers or external institutions. Researchers must submit a formal request including a detailed research proposal and data management plan. Upon approval by the study steering committee or data access committee, data will be shared under data use agreements ensuring confidentiality and compliance with ethical standards. Access will be provided via secure data transfer platforms. Shared data will include de-identified raw tumor expression data, clinicopathological variables, and follow-up information, enabling collaborative research while protecting participant privacy.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer Early Stage Breast Cancer (Stage 1-3)

Clinical Trials on Validation of Prognostic tool

Subscribe