Cellular-Level Fluorescence Imaging for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast Cancer (FLASH)

December 20, 2025 updated by: Du Zhenggui, West China Hospital

Assessment of the Accuracy of a Novel Cellular-Level Fluorescence-Guided Imaging Technique in Scanning Tumor Margins During Breast Tumor Resection: A Prospective, Self-Controlled Study

Accurate intraoperative margin assessment in breast cancer surgery remains challenging. Current reliance on frozen section pathology is limited by prolonged processing time, sampling constraints, and resource intensity, contributing to variable outcomes.

The EndoSCell Scanner is a novel cellular-resolution fluorescence-guided imaging technology designed to address these limitations. It enables real-time, pathology-level visualization of malignant cellular features at the surgical bed. With a 3mm probe allowing comprehensive 360° margin assessment, it reduces procedural time to under five minutes and may significantly lower secondary surgery rates.

This prospective, self-controlled study aims to evaluate the accuracy of the EndoSCell Scanner for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing mastectomy. Its performance will be systematically compared against both frozen section and final paraffin pathology to validate sensitivity and operational efficiency. If proven effective, this technology could become a standard adjunct tool, standardizing precision in breast cancer surgery and improving patient outcomes by enhancing surgical consistency.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

This study is a multicenter, prospective, self-controlled study. Basis for Sample Size Calculation: According to the results of the first phase, the accuracy of frozen pathology is 98.2%. Assuming that the detection interpretation results of ES are not inferior to intraoperative frozen pathology, a one-sided test will be conducted, with α=0.02, 1-β=0.8, and the non-inferiority margin is 0.02. The estimated required sample size is 593. Considering a 10% exclusion rate, the total sample size will be 659. Each patient is expected to have at least 4 samples taken, totaling 165 patients.

Data Collection:1)Basic patient information: age, gender; 2)Tumor diagnosis (including imaging diagnosis): location, size, and staging; 3)Intraoperative collected information: surgery start time, surgery end time; 4)Training and testing records of the physicians in the ES interpretation group; 5)Interpretation records: a.ES start time, ES interpretation end time, ES interpretation results, ES image satisfaction; b.Frozen pathology submission time, report receipt time, report results; c.Paraffin pathology submission time, report time, and report results.

The statistical analysis will be performed using SAS statistical software, version 9.4 or higher. All statistical tests will be two-sided. A P value less than or equal to 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The description of quantitative indicators will include the mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, maximum, and interquartile range. The description of categorical indicators will use the number and percentage of each category. The comparison of general conditions between the two groups will be analyzed using appropriate methods based on the type of indicators. The consistency evaluation of quantitative data will use the Bland-Altman method and ICC.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

165

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Chengdu, China
      • Chengdu, China
        • The Fourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province
        • Contact:
          • donglin zhang
          • Phone Number: +86 13684050025
      • Chengdu, China
        • West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University
        • Contact:
          • bin ma
          • Phone Number: +86 13999878091

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study will enroll 165 adult female patients scheduled to undergo breast surgery for histologically confirmed breast cancer. Eligible participants must provide written informed consent.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 - 70 years
  • Patients scheduled for breast tumor resection
  • Clinically or radiologically showing a solitary lesion and

    1. (Before neoadjuvant chemotherapy) Maximum tumor diameter ≤ 5cm;
    2. cN0-1;
    3. No clinical or imaging evidence of nipple, skin, chest wall invasion, or distant metastasis before surgery.
  • Subjects voluntarily sign informed consent or are exempted from signing upon approval by the ethics committee.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inflammatory breast cancer;
  • Patients allergic to methylene blue and sodium fluorescein;
  • Unable to understand the trial requirements or unable to complete the study follow-up plan;
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women;
  • Patients unable to complete follow-up due to mental illness, cognitive or emotional disorders;
  • Those with severe comorbidities (such as organ dysfunction, immune deficiency) or poor general condition;
  • Those participating in other clinical studies that may affect this trial;
  • Those for whom satisfactory specimens for both frozen pathology and paraffin pathology cannot be obtained during surgery;
  • Those who cannot obtain a paraffin pathology report.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the EndoSCell Scanner (ES) detection, using paraffin pathology as the gold standard, in comparison to rapid frozen section (FS) pathology.
Time Frame: 3 month
3 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer Early Stage Breast Cancer (Stage 1-3)

Subscribe