- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07372482
Evaluating the Impact of Fat and Sugar Replacer Blends on Gastrointestinal Tolerance in Biscuits
March 26, 2026 updated by: Mondelēz International, Inc.
This study is a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial aiming at evaluating the gastrointestinal tolerance and bowel habits of sugar- and fat- replacer ingredients and blends (maltitol, polydextrose, allulose and EPG)
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study will have a randomized, double-blind, crossover design with 8 visits consisting of one screening visit and 7 study visits (3 to 14-day interval between the start of each visit) across 4-12 weeks.
Participants will be randomized to a test sequence and, during the course of the study, will complete 7 trial arms.
At each visit eligible participants will come to INQUIS between 8-11am, and ~1-2h after consuming their usual breakfast at home.
After rating the severity of GI symptoms, participants will consume one of the investigational products with a drink of water (250ml) and then be free to leave.
The severity of 11 symptoms will be rated at 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24h: Abdominal bloating, Abdominal pain, Gas/flatulence, Gas with discharge, Burping, Reflux (heartburn), Stomach rumbling (borborygmus), Urgency of bowel movement, Oily spotting (leakage), Nausea and Vomiting.
The severity of each symptom will be rated by the subject as None, Mild, Moderate or Severe (these ratings will be assigned scores of 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively).
For each bowel movement (BM) passed during the 24h period, participants will be asked to record: the time, if they had to strain (yes or no), if they experienced discomfort (yes or no), if they felt there was incomplete evacuation (yes or no), if they had oily evacuation (oil separated from the stools) (yes or no), if they had oily stool (oily lumps in the stool) (yes or no) and the consistency of the stool rated using the using the Bristol Stool Scale (BSS).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
56
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5C 2N8
- INQUIS Clinical Research
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Non-pregnant, non-lactating, healthy individuals aged 18-55 years, inclusive
- Body Mass Index (BMI) 18.5-32.0kg/m², inclusive
- No major illness, trauma or surgery requiring hospitalization within 3 months of the screening visit
- Ability to understand the study procedures and willing to provide informed consent to participate in the study
- Non-smokers or smokers who smoke <10 cigarettes/day and are willing not to change nicotine habits during the study period
- Willing to limit alcohol consumption to ≤3 standard drinks/day and ≤7 standard drinks/week during the study period
- Willing to refrain from any marijuana or hemp products during the study period
- Normal bowel habits (>2 bowel movements/week and <3 bowel movements per day)
- Consumes ≤4 servings/day of fruits and vegetables combined and ≤3 (women) or ≤4 (men) servings/day of whole grains using the definitions of "serving" .
- Participants must have a cell phone/tablet/computer and be willing and able to use it to collect study data
- Participants must be eligible to receive income in Canada and be covered by a health insurance plan such as OHIP (Ontario Health Insurance Plan)
- Participants are willing to follow current COVID guidelines with respect to attending study visits
Exclusion Criteria:
- Failure to meet any one of the inclusion criteria
- Chronic moderate to severe gastrointestinal symptoms
- Use of systemic antibiotics, antifungals or antiparasitics in the past 3 months and during the experimental period
- Use of medications, supplements, and products which may affect the results (laxative, anti-diarrhea, anti-constipation drugs, high fiber supplements)
- Individuals with any medical conditions or use of supplements or medications that increase risk to the subject or others or may affect the results, as judged by the Principal - Investigator
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with the experimental procedures and to follow INQUIS safety guidelines
- Known intolerance, sensitivity, or allergy to any ingredients in the study test products
- Subject is currently participating or recently (within 30 days of screening) participated in a clinical trial involving long-term exposure (greater than 24 hours) to an investigational drug, nutritional supplement, or lifestyle modification
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Control biscuit
Sandwiched biscuit with usual sugar and fat content (2 servings = 60g)
|
Acute intake
|
|
Active Comparator: Control biscuit reduced in fat with EPG
Sandwiched biscuit with usual sugar content and fat partly replaced by EPG in basecake (2 servings = 60g)
|
Acute intake
|
|
Active Comparator: Sugar reduced biscuit with blend 1
Sandwiched biscuit reduced in sugar and containing sugar-replacer blend 1 (2 servings = 60g)
|
Acute intake
|
|
Active Comparator: Sugar reduced biscuit with blend 1 + EPG in basecake
Sandwiched biscuit reduced in sugar and containing sugar-replacer blend 1 and EPG replacing fat in basecake (2 servings = 60g)
|
Acute intake
|
|
Active Comparator: Sugar reduced biscuit with blend 1 + EPG in basecake & creme
Sandwiched biscuit reduced in sugar and containing sugar-replacer blend 1 and EPG replacing fat in basecake & creme (2 servings = 60g)
|
Acute intake
|
|
Active Comparator: Sugar reduced biscuit with blend 2
Sandwiched biscuit reduced in sugar and containing sugar-replacer blend 2 (2 servings = 60g)
|
Acute intake
|
|
Active Comparator: Sugar reduced biscuit with blend 2 + EPG in basecake
Sandwiched biscuit reduced in sugar and containing sugar-replacer blend 2 and EPG replacing fat in basecake (2 servings = 60g)
|
Acute intake
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Area Under the Curve (tAUC) of composite gastrointestinal Symptom score
Time Frame: tAUC between 0 and 24 hours
|
total area under the curve (tAUC) of the composite GastroIntestinal symptom score (sum of the scores for the 11 GI symptoms).
The score values can range from 0 up to 24 with the higher values showing the higher levels of symptoms (worse conditions).
|
tAUC between 0 and 24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of Diarrhea within 24 hours
Time Frame: Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
Proportion of participants with diarrhea, defined as 3 or more type 6 or 7 stools (based on the BSS) within the 24 hour period after consumption of the study products
|
Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
|
Number of bowel movements
Time Frame: Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
Number of bowel movements over the 24 hours
|
Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
|
straining during bowel movement
Time Frame: Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
Proportion of participants having to strain or not
|
Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
|
discomfort during bowel movement
Time Frame: Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
Proportion of participants having discomfort or not
|
Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
|
incomplete evacuation
Time Frame: Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
Proportion of participants declaring incomplete evacuation or not
|
Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
|
Frequency of composite score > 1 at each time point
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Proportion of participants who have a composite GastoInestinal symptom score >1 (moderate-to-severe) at each time point.
The composite score can range from 0 up to 24 with the higher values showing the higher levels of symptoms (worse conditions)
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for abdominal bloating
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Proportion of participants reporting any (score>0) or moderate/severe (score >1) at each time point
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for abdominal bloating
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Maximum detected score (which can range from 0 up to 3)
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for abdominal pain
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Proportion of participants reporting any (score>0) or moderate/severe (score >1) at each time point
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for abdominal pain
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Maximum detected score (which can range from 0 up to 3)
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Time of maximum score for abdominal pain
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Time of the maximum score
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for flatulence
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Proportion of participants reporting any (score>0) or moderate/severe (score >1) at each time point
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for flatulence
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Maximum detected score (which can range from 0 up to 3)
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Time for maximum score for flatulence
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Time of the maximum score
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for burping
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Proportion of participants reporting any (score>0) or moderate/severe (score >1) at each time point
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for burping
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Maximum detected score (which can range from 0 up to 3)
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Time for maximum score for burping
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Time of the maximum score
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for reflux
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Proportion of participants reporting any (score>0) or moderate/severe (score >1) at each time point
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for reflux
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Maximum detected score (which can range from 0 up to 3)
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Time for maximum score for reflux
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Time of the maximum score
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for stomach rumbling
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Proportion of participants reporting any (score>0) or moderate/severe (score >1) at each time point
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for stomach rumbling
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Maximum detected score (which can range from 0 up to 3)
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Time for maximum score for stomach rumbling
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Time of the maximum score
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for nausea
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Proportion of participants reporting any (score>0) or moderate/severe (score >1) at each time point
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for nausea
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Maximum detected score (which can range from 0 up to 3)
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Time for maximum score for nausea
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Time of the maximum score
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for vomiting
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Proportion of participants reporting any (score>0) or moderate/severe (score >1) at each time point
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for vomiting
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Maximum detected score (which can range from 0 up to 3)
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Time for maximum score for vomiting
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Time of the maximum score
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Stool consistency based on bristol stool scale
Time Frame: Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
mean stool consistency on Bristol Stool Scale (BSS).
The scale provide values from 1 to 7 depending on the type of stool with 1 being the driest stools and 7 the most liquid one.
|
Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
|
Total Area Under the Curve of each individual gastrointestinal symptom
Time Frame: tAUC between 0 and 24 hours
|
Total Area Under the Curve of each of the individual 11 gastrointestinal symptoms (Abdominal bloating, Abdominal pain, Gas/flatulence, Gas with discharge, Burping, Reflux (heartburn), Stomach rumbling (borborygmus), Urgency of bowel movement, Oily spotting (leakage), Nausea and Vomiting).
Each symptom range from 0 up to 3 with 3 showing the highest / worse condiiton of symptoms
|
tAUC between 0 and 24 hours
|
|
Time for maximum score for abdominal bloating
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Time of the maximum score for bloating
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Time for maximum score for gas with discharge
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Time of the maximum score
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for gas with discharge
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Proportion of participants reporting any (score>0) or moderate/severe (score >1) at each time point
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for gas with discharge
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Maximum detected score (which can range from 0 up to 3)
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Time for maximum score for Oily spotting (leakage)
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Time of the maximum score
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for Evaluation oily spotting (leakage)
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Proportion of participants reporting any (score>0) or moderate/severe (score >1) at each time point
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
Maximum score for oily spotting (leakage)
Time Frame: Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
Maximum detected score (which can range from 0 up to 3)
|
Evaluation performed at time 0, 2, 4, 6, 10 and 24 hours
|
|
oily evacuation (oil separated from the stools)
Time Frame: Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
Proportion of participants declaring having oily evacuation (oil separated from the stools)
|
Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
|
oily stool (oily lumps in the stool)
Time Frame: Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
Proportion of participants declaring having oily stool (oily lumps in the stool)
|
Evaluation performed over 24 hour after consumption of study products
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 28, 2025
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 27, 2026
Study Completion (Actual)
February 27, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 19, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
January 28, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 27, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 26, 2026
Last Verified
March 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KBE073 / INQ-2405
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gastrointestinal Tolerance
-
Abbott NutritionCompleted
-
Abbott NutritionCompleted
-
Abbott NutritionCompleted
-
Cambridge GlycoscienceCompletedGastrointestinal ToleranceIreland
-
Tate & LyleBiofortis Innovation ServicesCompletedGastrointestinal ToleranceUnited States
-
Abbott NutritionCompletedGastrointestinal ToleranceTurkey
-
Comet Bio Inc.Biofortis, Merieux NutriSciencesUnknownGastrointestinal Tolerance
-
Abbott NutritionCompleted
-
Abbott NutritionCompleted
-
Abbott NutritionRecruitingGastrointestinal ToleranceUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Control sandwiched biscuit with sugar
-
China Medical University HospitalUnknownImpaired Glucose ToleranceTaiwan
-
University of UlsterThe Regional Centre for Studies in Food and Health (CREAS), Valparaíso, ChileCompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Dyslipidemias | Lipid ProfileUnited Kingdom
-
Mondelēz International, Inc.University of Sydney; Glycemic Index Laboratories, Inc; BioFortisCompletedGlycaemia | InsulinemiaAustralia, Canada, France
-
Clinical Nutrition Research Centre, SingaporeCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | DiabetesSingapore
-
Harokopio UniversityNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompleted
-
Harokopio UniversityAgricultural University of Athens; National Hellenic Research Foundation; PAPADOPOULOS...Completed
-
Universite du Sine Saloum Elhadj Ibrahima NiasseCompletedThis Study Aimed to Evaluate the Impact of Fortified Biscuit Consumption on the Iron Status of School-aged Children in Rural KaolackSenegal
-
University of UdineEnrolling by invitationSarcopenia | Nutritional Intervention | Quality of Life Outcomes | Sarcopenia in Elderly | Microbiome Analysis | Biomarkers / Blood | Muscle Mass and StrengthItaly
-
Arizona State UniversityChristopher Wharton; Eric Bartholomae; April Incollingo; Maricarmen VizcainoCompleted
-
University of BrasiliaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; MRC Human Nutrition...Completed