Post-stroke Nurse-led Rehabilitation to Improve Functional Activity and Community Participation in Bangladesh

April 1, 2026 updated by: Salma Akhter, Hiroshima University

Post-discharge Nurse-led Rehabilitation to Improve Functional Activity and Community Participation Among Stroke-Patients in Bangladesh: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Stroke causes various levels of disability which decreases physical function for a prolonged period. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led rehabilitation program including a multidisciplinary team focused on improving the functional ability among post-stroke patients in Bangladesh. A prospective, open-label (1:1) randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted at the National Institute of Neuroscience & Hospital (NINS&H) in Dhaka, Bangladesh from January 2026 to September 2026. Participants will be the post-stroke patients who got discharged from NINS&H within 2 weeks after the onset of stroke and the family caregivers of the patients and meet the inclusion criteria. The sample size will be calculated based on G-Power analysis with a medium effect size and will be 166. The intervention will be designed to provide the 6-months Nurse-led rehabilitation program including a multidisciplinary team regarding self-care and the use of assistive devices. Assessment for rehabilitation will be performed by the multidisciplinary team with research nurses (RA nurses), physiotherapists (PT) and occupational therapists (OT). The control group will receive the usual care. The primary outcome is improved activity and participation measured by the Functional Independence Measurement (FIM). The secondary outcomes are improved motor function, self-efficacy, emotional status and participation ability. The endpoints will be compared at baseline, 3rd and 6th months. We assume that patients receiving rehabilitation education and assistive device progress to achieve an optimal level of independence, with improved motor function, emotional status and participation ability to re-integrate into society.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Stroke is a significant cause of adult death and disability globally, leading to clinical, social, and economic challenges for individuals, families, and healthcare systems. Over 12 million new strokes are reported each year, with about 50% of survivors facing long-term functional impairments that affect their ability to live independently [. Post-acute disability commonly comprises motor deficits, cognitive and perceptual dysfunction, communication disorders, and restrictions in activities of daily living (ADLs), greatly diminishing quality of life . Consequently, rehabilitation is essential in stroke management to restore function, avert complications, and support community reintegration .

Growing evidence indicates that stroke rehabilitation is most effective with a multidisciplinary team (MDT) model, incorporating physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, rehabilitation physicians, psychologists, and nurses . MDT-based rehabilitation facilitates coordinated goal setting, individualized therapy plans, and early identification of barriers to progress . When compared to non-coordinated care, systematic studies and clinical guidelines consistently show that planned and interdisciplinary stroke care improves functional outcomes, lowers mortality, and increases the chance of returning home after stroke.

Post-acute rehabilitation, following medical stabilization, is vital for enhancing neuroplasticity as targeted interventions during this phase can improve motor function, cognitive function, and functional independence . Patients receiving intensive post-acute therapy exhibited significantly better gains in mobility, self-care, and participation outcomes over 12 weeks compared to lower-intensity groups . Studies found that combining cognitive-motor therapy with traditional MDT practice improved executive function and ADL performance across a 6-week period. These findings underscore the value of holistic MDT programs in addressing the multidimensional impairments common in stroke survivors.

Adherence to rehabilitation is a behavior that indicates the patient's commitment to and willingness to engage in the planned therapy regimen and treatment to improve daily living activities, quality of life, and outcomes as well as prevent complications and recurrence of stroke. Treating chronic illnesses like stroke, adherence to long-term therapies, particularly rehabilitation, is a significant healthcare challenge. Digital health approaches like tele-services with personalized advice, emotional support, and time influences for enhancing rehabilitation adherence in stroke patients as relevant quality feedback significantly improves adherence. Medical experts emphasize that key determinants of adherence in out-of-hospital rehabilitation include access to tele-rehabilitation, tele-medical resources, and active participation from outpatient clinics highlighting the need for attention to both in- and out-of-hospital rehabilitation. For effective rehabilitation, a reliable scale to measure patient adherence to the regimen is essential.

Nurse-led rehabilitation and care for stroke patients combined with a multidisciplinary team significantly improves motor recovery, functional independence (ADL), and quality of life and self-management when compared to standard care. Acute care, rehabilitation, discharge, and community/home-based follow-up can all be bridged by nurse-led programs, which are typically feasible, effective, and acceptable .

In LMICs including Bangladesh, there is a lack of institutional acute, post-acute and long-term rehabilitation services available after receiving acute care management from the hospital . Patients with disabilities who need rehabilitation suffer due to inadequate healthcare infrastructure and financial resources . As there are insufficient post-stroke institutional services available in Bangladesh, home-based stroke rehabilitation could be an alternative way to play a vital role in ensuring continuity of care and supporting functional recovery within patients' home environments.

Therefore, this study will explore the effectiveness of a structured nurse-led multidisciplinary post-acute rehabilitation program. This study would provide more rigorous evidence on whether coordinated, team-based rehabilitative interventions significantly enhance functional independence compared to conventional rehabilitation approaches in Bangladesh. The findings could guide clinical practice standards, support the development of optimized rehabilitation pathways for stroke survivors and reform health-care policy for the disabled.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

166

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Co-Principal Investigator, K A T M Ehsanul Huq, PhD, MD/MBBS
  • Phone Number: Co-Principal Investigator
  • Email: ehsan@hiroshima-u.ac.jp

Study Locations

    • Dhaka Division
      • Dhaka, Dhaka Division, Bangladesh, 1207
        • Recruiting
        • National Institute of Neuroscience and Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Md. Mahmudul Islam, MBBS, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18 years old and above, both males & females,
  2. Irrespective of the type of stroke and time of stroke,
  3. mRS 2-4 with disability on upper and/or lower limb(s)
  4. Physician advice on rehabilitation, and who needs assistive devices for ADL,
  5. Having a phone, and
  6. Willing to provide consent & participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participation in other clinical trials,
  2. Planning to receive institutional rehabilitation services, and
  3. Cannot communicate (having speech difficulties).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Health Education and assistive devices

Participants will be trained in self-care with stroke disabilities (e.g. eating, grooming, bathing, dressing, toileting), physical exercise, lifestyle modification, prevention of complications after stroke through researcher developed "Health booklet". Based on their disabilities, some assistive and exercise devices will be provided to them for improving functional independence.

After discharge they will be educated and followed by RA nurses through tele services for 6 months. The nurses will contact the participants periodically over the telephone, and follow up on their regular self-care activities, adjustment to devices, exercise and participatory behavior.

Participants will be provided with education booklet and assistive devices for implement in their daily life to improve their functional activity.
Other Names:
  • Education Booklet
No Intervention: No education or Devices
The participants in CG will not receive "Education booklet" or assistive device . They will receive the usual rehabilitation education from the hospital.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Functional Activity
Time Frame: 6 months
It will be measured by Functional Independence Measurement (FIM). The FIM was developed in 1983 by a task force from the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM) and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (AAPM&R) [23]. The Bengali version of the scale was implemented among the functionally disabled patients in Bangladesh and found to be valid and reliable (α = 0.97) [24]. This scale has 18 items from level 1-total assistance to level 7-complete independence. This scale consists of 2 sub-scales including physical (13 items) and cognitive (5 items) domains. The physical domain score ranges from 13-91 and the cognitive domain score ranges from 5-35. The total score range is from 18-126. The higher the score, the better the level of independence.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in rehabilitation adherence
Time Frame: 6 months
Rehabilitation adherence will be measured by the rehabilitation adherence questionnaire which is developed by the research team, and it was validated by stroke and chronic care expert. This scale has 3 items with a 5-point Likert scale, and the score ranges from 3- 15. The higher mean score indicates greater adherence to rehabilitation.
6 months
Changes in motor function
Time Frame: 6 months
The motor function will be measured by the Motricity Index (MI) developed by Demeurisse et al. in 1980 which is valid & reliable (α= 0.93) [25]to assess the motor impairment of participants. Three movements for upper (pinch grip, PG; elbow flexion, EF; shoulder abduction, SA) and lower (ankle dorsiflexion, AD; knee extension, KE; hip flexion, HF) limbs are assessed for evaluating motor function. It is a 6-point scale for the arm and leg test; 3 points for trunk control test. A total score ranging from 0 (complete paresis) to 100 (normal strength) and is computed for each limb on both sides, and a side score can be computed by averaging upper and lower limb scores. The higher score indicates better limb function.
6 months
Changes in self-efficacy
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-efficacy will be assessed by the generalized self-efficacy scale (GSE) (Jerusalem et al., 1981) [26]. This scale assessed patients' self-efficacy after experiencing post-stroke stress and the strength of an individual's belief in situations. It was translated into the Bengali version and was found valid and reliable (α = 0.7 to 0.91) [27]. It has a total of 10 items with a 4-point Likert scale that ranges from 1= not at all true to 4=exactly true. The lowest score is 10 and the highest score is 40. The higher score indicates better self-efficacy.
6 months
Changes in emotional status
Time Frame: 6 months
he emotional status will be assessed using a subdomain of stroke impact scale (SIS) which is valid and reliable for assessing patient-perceived mood, emotional control, and psychological well-being following stroke [28]. This subdomain scale has 9 items with a 5-point Likert scale and score ranges from 9-45. Domain scores will be calculated using standard SIS scoring procedures and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating less perceived impact of stroke.
6 months
Changes in participation abilities
Time Frame: 6 months
Participation ability will be measured by participation/role function subdomain of the stroke impact scale (SIS) to evaluate restrictions in social participation, meaningful activities, and societal roles. This subdomain scale has 8 items with a 5-point Likert scale and score ranges from 8-40. Domain scores will be calculated using standard SIS scoring procedures and transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating less perceived impact of stroke.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Salma Akhter, RN, MSN, Hiroshima University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on in daily routine practice

Subscribe