Palpatory and Ultrasonographic Assessment of Tissue Compressibility: Validation and Learning Effects in Phantom Models

This validation study compares clinical palpation and ultrasonographic measurements of tissue compressibility using standardized phantom models. Operators with different levels of clinical and ultrasound experience perform repeated, blinded assessments across multiple sessions. The study evaluates accuracy, reliability, agreement between modalities, and learning effects over time, aiming to support standardized and more objective assessment of tissue compressibility in clinical practice.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants with different years of clinical experience and levels of experience in ultrasound diagnostics (medical students, residents, and attendings) will be included. Age >= 18 years.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical professionals and medical students

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy and reliability of palpation and ultrasonographic compression measurements
Time Frame: Over 3 sessions, seperated by at least 1 day and at most 1 week (study duration: 3 days to 2 weeks)
Intraoperator and interoperator accuracy and reliability of palpation and ultrasonographic compression measurements on two phantom models as intraclass correlation coefficient and linear mixed-effects model
Over 3 sessions, seperated by at least 1 day and at most 1 week (study duration: 3 days to 2 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of operator characteristics on the measurement accuracy and reliability.
Time Frame: Over 3 sessions, seperated by at least 1 day and at most 1 week (study duration: 3 days to 2 weeks)
Operator characteristics (age, gender, level of experience) will be introduced as fixed effects in a linear mixed-effects model with a random effect for participants to account for repeated measurements
Over 3 sessions, seperated by at least 1 day and at most 1 week (study duration: 3 days to 2 weeks)
Assess the learning curve in palpation and ultrasound measurements
Time Frame: Over 3 sessions, seperated by at least 1 day and at most 1 week (study duration: 3 days to 2 weeks)
Changes in accuracy of both modalities using linear mixed-effects model with a random effect for participants to account for repeated measurements. To test possible confounding factors, they will be introduced as fixed effects.
Over 3 sessions, seperated by at least 1 day and at most 1 week (study duration: 3 days to 2 weeks)
Correlate the compression measurements with palpatory assessment
Time Frame: Over 3 sessions, seperated by at least 1 day and at most 1 week (study duration: 3 days to 2 weeks)
Correlation of both modalities using linear mixed-effects model with a random effect for participants to account for repeated measurements. To test possible confounding factors, they will be introduced as fixed effects.
Over 3 sessions, seperated by at least 1 day and at most 1 week (study duration: 3 days to 2 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data supporting this study's findings are available upon request from Samuel Tschopp, the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data supporting this study's findings are available upon request from Samuel Tschopp, the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Exanimation

Subscribe