Management of Bone Loss in Orthopaedic Surgery Using the Masquelet Technique or Transport Nails (EPSOCOT)

April 22, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

Evaluation of the Management of Bone Loss in Orthopaedic Surgery Using the Masquelet Technique or Transport Nails

This is a single-center prospective observational study comparing two techniques for reconstructing bone loss in the lower limbs. The aim of the study was to compare the results of reconstructions using the Masquelet technique with reconstructions using electromagnetic transport nails. The primary endpoint was time to bone healing. This study is the first prospective descriptive study of electromagnetic transport nails.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Segmental bone defects pose a major challenge in orthopaedics due to various causes like trauma, oncology resections, or chronic osteomyelitis. Reconstruction techniques are complex, with Masquelet's method being the most widely used in France, despite mixed outcomes and complications. A novel electromagnetic bone transport technique via intramedullary nailing has emerged as a promising alternative. The primary goal of the study is to compare consolidation times between these two approaches for metaphyseal-diaphyseal bone loss in the lower limbs. Secondary objectives include assessing patient demographics, functional outcomes, quality of life, hospital stays, and adverse events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • CHU de Bordeaux
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Anaïs DELGOVE, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient ≥ 18 years
  • Minor patient, able to consent to data collection, with the consent of the owner(s)
  • Patient consulting for a medical reason involving a loss of bone substance in the lower limb in an investigating centre linked to one of these aetiologies for which a reconstruction procedure using a transport nail or Masquelet technique is envisaged:

    • Tumour pathologies requiring
    • Septic or aseptic pseudarthrosis
    • Traumatic pathology
    • Infectious pathologies

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under guardianship or curatorship,
  • Individuals deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision,
  • Individuals receiving involuntary psychiatric care requiring the consent of their legal representative,
  • Individuals unable to express their consent,
  • Individuals under legal protection,
  • Patients with an indication for bone reconstruction using a technique other than the Masquelet technique and nail transport,
  • Patients not covered by a social security scheme,
  • Patients ineligible for bone reconstruction due to their comorbidities

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Masquelet's method
Patient consulting for a medical reason involving a loss of bone substance in the lower limb in an investigating centre linked to one of these aetiologies for which a reconstruction procedure using a Masquelet technic is envisaged
Exhaustive collection of data in a health data warehouse: collection of clinical, radiological examinations (standard of care), functionals scores and self- administered questionnaire (quality of life).
Other: Transport nail
Patient consulting for a medical reason involving a loss of bone substance in the lower limb in an investigating centre linked to one of these aetiologies for which a reconstruction procedure using a transport nail is envisaged
Exhaustive collection of data in a health data warehouse: collection of clinical, radiological examinations (standard of care), functionals scores and self- administered questionnaire (quality of life).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of radiological consolidation
Time Frame: From enrollment to 36 months after
Radiological consolidation is defined by an anteroposterior and lateral radiograph showing at least three out of four cortical plates consolidated. This assessment is performed during follow-up by the physician treating the patient and will be confirmed by an evaluation committee at a later stage.
From enrollment to 36 months after

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcomes : score MSTS
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Functional recovery assessed using MSTS (Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score). It is composed of 6 items , each item on a scale of 0 to 5, with a higher score indicating better function. The total score, ranging from 0 (maximum disability) to 30 (no disability), can be converted to a point scale from 0 to 100.
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Time to full weight-bearing
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Time from initial reconstructive surgery to full weight-bearing without assistive devices, as assessed during routine clinical follow-up.
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
. Functional outcomes : score LEFS
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Functional recovery assessed using Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). It is composed of 20 items , each item on a scale of 0 to 4, with a higher score indicating better function and total score from 0 to 80.
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Functional outcomes : paley Marr score.
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Functional recovery assessed using Paley-Maar score. This score is defined from "excellent" to "poor"in fonction of pain, autonomous, ....
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Health-related quality of life evaluated using the SF-36 questionnaire. This questionnaire is composed of 11 items and total score from 0 to 100.
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Adverse events and complications
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Occurrence and type of adverse events and complications, including infections, mechanical failures, nonunion, and need for revision surgery.
3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Bone consolidation rate
Time Frame: From enrollment to 36 months after
Proportion of patients achieving radiological bone consolidation, defined as healing of at least 3 of 4 cortices on standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs.
From enrollment to 36 months after

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benjamin BOUYER, PROF, University Hospital, Bordeaux

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical-size Bone Defect

Clinical Trials on Data collection and self-administered questionnaire.

Subscribe